Sam wrote on Sep 23, 2007 5:45 AM:
" Meth Sucks! ...try living next door to a 'Meth Head' "
former hanford resident wrote on Sep 23, 2007 8:11 AM:
" this is exactly why i left hanford. i was born and raised there and from then til now...it has lost its sense of "home" for me. i honestly cannot raise my children there with hanford being known as the Meth capital of california. one of my closest friends still lives there...meth has her though. she WILLINGLY gave up her kids to the state. i live on the central coast and even people here know hanford to be the meth capital of california. how sad is that???!!! "
Surprise wrote on Sep 23, 2007 11:59 AM:
" I am so surprise that the Sentinel is doing a story about the evils of meth, instead of about the "providers" of this stuff here in Hanford. It is widely known in this town who the suppliers are and wouldn't alot of "us" be surprised who are making money from all of this misery. As for the Calhouns, a little late to be speaking up against this stuff. Ronald was a police officer and Sherrill was involved on the school board and yet they are quiet until they need to appease their conscience. I have an idea: why not write stories about the good kids from this town. The ones that are going to school and with the support of their family are fullfilling their goals for a better life. Hopefully, that will be a future that we can be proud of. "
Sad for Kings County wrote on Sep 23, 2007 1:05 PM:
" This this confirms how Kings County really doesn't care. You have City Councils and Board of Supervisors who don't care about public safety and because THEY are forcing our experienced public safety officers to leave for better paying jobs. In time there will be public safety officers that are so inexperienced; so new to be able to put a handle on it, that this area will become even worse and our public safety unable to handle or cope with it any longer. Mark my words, it will happen and by this time the persons to blame will have already left office and by then it will just be history and people saying "I told you so". "
A need for services wrote on Sep 23, 2007 3:32 PM:
" I have been dealing with addicts and their families for years. Not on a social worker level, not in counseling, not in law enforcement. I match services to needs. This county has a great plan in place, a few great programs, limited space. We desparately need is more inpatient drug services close by, a reasonable distance from family and friends. The drug statistics show that 98% of those arrested are using meth. Those people are "criminals", but they are moms, dads, daughters, sons, teachers, construction workers, farm laborers, secretaries, white collar, homeless people...etc. The face of addiction is your neighbor, co-worker, boss, beggar, you. Our jails and prisons are full, some are there because of crimes related to making or acquiring drugs. So what can society do to "fix" their problem? My opinion is provide services to help them get clean if they want it, not because it's ordered. If an addict really wants to get clean, they need a lot of help. Meth "melts" their minds to the point where they cannot make a plan to get better and kick their addiction. Meanwhile, children are neglected and abused, grandparents a parenting, it takes a village to help. "
I HATE TWEEKERS! wrote on Sep 24, 2007 7:42 AM:
" When i was 15 years old i was turned on to meth:( I am 31 now and have been clean for 13 years!!!!! The sad thing is Meth is not the problem for kids today! I know for a fact its perscription drugs! They are not just takeing VICODEN they are snorting it! We need to focus on that a little more! the kids will always out smart us and find anything o get high on!!! "
Webmaster wrote on Sep 24, 2007 9:37 AM:
" Test Time Stamp "
Brooke wrote on Sep 24, 2007 10:24 AM:
" Of course, being a resident of Kings County, I have known many people affected by this drug. Who hasn't?! BUT, this article, although written well, seems to be an article educating us on what meth is, the history of it, etc. Which, don't get me wrong, that's great. We need the education of the drug to start prevention. BUT, there needs to be more prevention. Of course education is the start of it. Let's face it, Meth is never going to go away, nor will many drugs. There has to be SOME way to help this kids and adults who have the disease of addiction. "
Alan G. wrote on Sep 24, 2007 11:48 AM:
" You know what's really fun? Watching men in white space suits walking around your rental property and seeing your tenants in handcuffs and their kids being picked up by child services, ON THE NEWS!! My rental property was located in Riverside County, which also shares the title of "Meth Capital" and my tenant had two ice chests filled with meth manufacturing materials. By the time I had visited my property, it had been tossed by the police and coated in some kind of powder. Once the police left, their tweeker friends had broken in and stole or damaged everything else. The clean-up was disgusting to say the least, and costly too!! The county tried to bill me for the cost of their response team, which I fought and did not pay. I tracked the husband in prison and as soon as he was released, I took him to court and sued his pants off. Shortly after that, I sold the property. It's a fun story to tell at parties though. "
Not so fun Alan G. from QLG! wrote on Sep 24, 2007 1:29 PM:
" What La La land did YOU come from?Many years back I had the opportunity to ride along with one our local sheriff's in a department squad car to see firsthand what our law enforcement men and women in uniform came up against when dealing with the local tweekers and dealers of this horrible NAZI-German chemist invented drug.It isn't fun for law-enforcement to have to man-handle an uncontrollable,out-of-their-mind human who has the strength of 10 humans in a 115#body.As for the dealers, look also into our own well groomed upstanding citizen neighborhoods for a majority of them.Local farmers and their people...illegal’s and citizens having access to the chemicals necessary to cook up the stuff. It's just not FUN Alan G.!You get a big kick out of telling the story?It's not fun to find toddlers crawling around piles of pornnography magazines and pornography videos playing endlessly on the T.V.,they have drugs&dangerous paraphernalia at their reach, live on the trash covered floors as far as their eye can see, with passed out users and their own paranoid mothers and fathers tweeking. The sheriff told me a statistic every 3rd house in ANY neighborhood has a user of METH. FUN? "
Alan G. wrote on Sep 24, 2007 4:20 PM:
" Hey QLG, I was being sarcastic. For the record: It's definitely NOT fun to see your rental property on TV and children taken away from their families. It's NOT fun to have to clean up your rental property and feel like you need a tetanus shot afterwards. "
Brooke wrote on Sep 24, 2007 5:02 PM:
" I sensed the sarcasm, Alan G., and understand. I have family in Riverside. "
hmm wrote on Sep 24, 2007 6:43 PM:
" One of the first signs is ,they lose the ability to honestly laugh, then they take and sell anything to get more, then they get speed bumps on thier skin, then their hair and teeth fall out. They collect their own urine because they know that they can get meth out of it with a mr. coffee machine. Then they turn into insects. Hitler injected at least daily, and then gave his own tank drivers a bunch, knowing they probably would never return anyway. "
RESPONSIBILITY wrote on Sep 24, 2007 9:02 PM:
" Dear Alan G, why didn't you try to be a responsible land owner and screen your tenants in Riverside County better? Seems like you didn't have a clue what was going on on your own property. Not all of us can be rich rental property owners, you know. I lived down these also and did not have the problems you complain about. Couldn't you figure out how to deduct the damage and cleanup from your income taxes? I cannot feel sorry for you. "
Focus is on Kings County's problem, not Riverside Brooke wrote on Sep 24, 2007 11:36 PM:
" Your sensibilites are exceptional Brooke, what part of the blog did you read between the lines to find the mordant sarcasm? Where did it really come through thick? Was Alan really lampooning his own enviromental clean-up of the rental property? By the way Alan G., did you get the Riverside Health Departments inspectors of Envirometal Health to clear the apartment for rental and or sale? QLG "
Once A Tweeker wrote on Sep 25, 2007 9:11 AM:
" Well finally a situation that needs to be talked about. This is a real issue. I am in my older 20's and I was addicted to meth for about 10 years give or take. During my experience I delt with all types of social class. Yes not only the people from the bottom deal with meth but many people with good paying jobs use meth. It is probably the hardest habit to kick. I have been sober for 3 years and it is still a struggle each day. Our younger genereation are using meth now. My advice to everyone if someone in your family is on meth DONT GIVE UP ON THEM! Save our children, our future. "
Alan G. wrote on Sep 25, 2007 11:50 AM:
" "Responsibility", you posed and interesting, if not naive question; why wasn't I a responsible landowner and screen my tenants properly? I'm just not aware of a test you can perform to predict people's future actions. Unlike the movie "Minority Report" we are not able to travel back in time and exterminate people based on future actions. And of course I deducted all expenses on my income taxes. Taking the deduction simply means you don't pay taxes on the money you spent. coming up with the out-of-pocket expenses beyond normal maintenance is not easy when you're not a "rich rental property owner." and by the way, if you lived in Ricerside County and weren't aware of it's meth problem, then you seriously live in a PollyAnnic bubble. Much like the San Joaquin Valley, Riverside County is very rural, which meth manufacturers prefer because they need to be far away from neighbors so they don't smell the toxic fumes. I usually find that if you think about your question long enough, you'll usually figure out the answer before you pose it. "
Alan G. wrote on Sep 25, 2007 12:03 PM:
" "QLG", your question is more sensible in regards to the EPA report. The property was free of any contamination and according to police, the tenant never got his operation up and running. His entire collection of chemicals fit into two ice chests and wasn't some full-blown set-up like you see on TV with 55 gallon drums of chemicals, beakers, tubes, etc... I was not responsible for the cost of the HazMat team because I had a property management company acting as my agents. Therefore, a case could not be made that I was ultimately responsible for placing the tenant or collecting rent directly. By the way, I simply related my firsthand experience with the collateral damage of the meth problem and people get all sensitive. What gives? Hey Alejandro, how is that for a logical response without ad hominem attacks? "
EPA guides local Department of Health Issues Alan. wrote on Sep 25, 2007 3:21 PM:
" In California in Article 3 of Chapter 6.9.1. Meth Contaminated Cleanup Act of 2005 it provides detailed codes and places the responsibility on local agencies to investigate all properties of their levels of toxicity before and after so-called responses to meth-labs no matter how small or large scale. Paraphrased, once clean-up has occurred it must be inspected and tested before it can be released for reoccupation. Alan you said the clean-up was disgusting. Did you help clean too? Oh yes, your property management company took care of that right. They contracted a licensed authorized HazMat qualified team. I'm really surprised you didn't have other agencies involved with their local public law requirements in health standards. You property insurance didn't cover any of these expenses? "
Mary wrote on Sep 25, 2007 5:21 PM:
" I would have to agree with surprise. Maybe I can't understand what "meth heads" go through as I have never been addicted to drugs but it's hard to raise kids nowadays with all this in their faces and in the schools. Do a story on kids that are doing good. Graduating high school and working or going to college. Lets glorify that instead of the drugs "
ALEJANDRO wrote on Sep 25, 2007 5:59 PM:
" I congratulate you, sir! "
Alan G. wrote on Sep 25, 2007 6:16 PM:
" The clean up of the home, post police, HazMat and tweeker break-in was disgusting. As in having to go through all of their personal items that were strewn throughout the house. The police tossed the place first in their search for drugs, then the HazMat team tossed it even more while collecting samples and finally the tweekers tossed the place when they were looking for anything of value to steal. And I won't even describe the personal stuff I found because it would be too gross to read this close to dinner time. I don't know how much clearer I can be, all of HazMat's tests of the interior and soil samples from the yard came up negative. UGH! "
confused wrote on Sep 25, 2007 10:22 PM:
" I am confused is this a story about meth in Hanford California or or landlord problems in Riverside. "
WAKE UP wrote on Sep 27, 2007 1:51 AM:
" Everyone wants to go after the drug dealers. Thats great, but if you dont have anyone buying drugs, you wont have anyone selling drugs. Along with dealers we need to drop the hamer on drug users. None of this prop 36 garbage either. that just gives users a free ride (or three). Meth is the biggest problem we face in this area. Why are we willing to shrug our shoulders and look away. The majority of the thefts and burglaries are due to meth addicts trying to get their next fix. If we arent willing to entertain the idea of capital punishment we need to seriously think of a solution. NO MERCY. If you are caught high on drugs, in possession of drugs, or selling drugs, you should be punished severely. If you disagree, have fun living in the problem you helped create. Im not willing to live here much longer if this garbage doesnt stop. Im tired of having things stolen and having my vehicle broke into. "
Iceman wrote on Oct 1, 2007 5:42 AM:
" No doubt meth is a big problem. How does the gov't respond? Limit Sudafed sales. Give me a break! What percent of meth was synthesized via OTC Sudafed sales? I don't know for sure, but I am sure it's much less than 1%. Why make an allergy sufferer sign an affidavit and produce ID and go to the pharmacy multiple times just to relieve seasonal allergies? Give me a break! "
Justice wrote on Oct 9, 2007 2:08 AM:
" To: Wake Up
I agree! Drop the hammer on the dealers AND the users! Prop 36 is BS! But of course that means more jail space is needed and THAT is a whole other issue. They want to kick people out now. People just aren't afraid of judical consequences now days because it seems as though there is none. And if someone is caught and or sentenced prison time, their relatives and friends run to the media and scream it was a setup or how crooked this county is, etc. Build a HUGE jail, make people pay for their crimes and MAYBE people will worry at least a little about going to jail. "
George wrote on Nov 10, 2007 8:07 AM:
" Good site! I'll stay reading! Keep improving! "