Currently
36°
Clear

Advertisement





Opinion

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Our View: There once was a town that wanted to grow...

Once upon a time there was a town that wanted to grow. It had lots to offer the folks who came to live there, and wanted to take advantage of the open spaces all around. At the time, there were people who drove noisy vehicles, but they assured the town's leaders that the noise from these vehicles wouldn't reach the new homes as the town grew. So the leaders set about planning for the homes that one day would be filled with happy residents.

As the years went by, and the leaders continued to plan for these new dwellings, the people who drove the noisy vehicles bought some even noisier vehicles. Uh-oh, they thought, we'd better tell the town's leaders, and see if they can change their plans.

OK, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the "town" is Lemoore, and the people with the "noisy vehicles" are Lemoore Naval Air Station.

The City of Lemoore wants to grow westward; LNAS suggests a different approach, thereby avoiding further residential growth under the flight path.

Last week, debate that so far had consumed four separate meetings -- and nearly 16 hours of public hearings -- came to a close. The outcome is that the Lemoore Planning Commission's recommendation to the city force developers, land-owners, the city, as well as the naval base, to settle for less than they had hoped for.

Here's the dilemma: Landowners and developers want the plan to stay as proposed, saying that their private property rights should be protected.

If Lemoore goes ahead with the general plan, it could risk unwanted urban encroachment in the base buffer zone, potentially costing future expansion of Navy operations in Lemoore that contributes $300 million a year to the local economy.

If the city rejects the plan completely, it could expose itself to liability from developers who have already been given approval to build houses there and landowners who have invested millions of dollars in the area for city-led improvements.

The Navy is offering to help the city secure federal money to take part in a joint land use study for the area, a process that has been used by other military communities like Marysville and Beaufort, S.C.

We hope the City of Lemoore waits for the Navy's new noise study, anticipated in November, and takes it up on its offer, before putting the general plan to rest.

Now's the time for all parties to come to the table and come up with a plan that makes sense for Lemoore.

(April 22, 2008)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

This is all about getting that... wrote on Apr 22, 2008 1:28 PM:

" sports complex started and completed along with the rest of the already in place plans for the development of West Hills College drafted years ago.What an attraction to awe a community!

"Dafted" were the plans for the tax base to insure growth.The school thought the citizen's wouldn't mind a mutual desire to see the expansion of the JC college and that bonds would pass. "NO PROBLEM" to complete this higher learning institution.

Some 100 acres of land was donated to the college.The remaining land surrounding it, are on the auction block from a FEW land owning farmers who no longer want to farm the land. Are they the developer's the city is talking about?

Lemoore's strong arming comes in to push issues that the buffer zone with the Navy is not acceptable.I think the Navy should abandoned Lemoore....move it out and make NAS Fallon, Nevada the Pacific Strike Fighter 's new jewel of the westcoast Navy and master jet air station!

How would Lemoore like that plan?Then Lemoore could expand as westwardly as possible without the Navy as an obstacle.The ineptitude of city council is their superior farsightedness. "

Sid wrote on Apr 22, 2008 1:42 PM:

" Process here is in question: The city apparently "wants new homes" without defining what jobs these new residents will have in hand before deciding to move here in the first place...

And placing at risk the largest employer/payroll producer in the area (NAS Lemoore) does seem counter-productive. Private Property rights are important, but so is the economic well being of Kings, Fresno and Tulare County residents.

Use this land in question next to the Leprino factory for new commercial and industrial job producing businesses using the locations unique location of two highways (41 & 198) and a railroad to move products and people with ease.

THEN, build houses in areas less sensitive to noise.

Process again: The City started it's Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process completed last February in 2006. The Navy stated its objections with alternative suggestions well within the parameters/time line of that process. They were not addressed until this late 11th hour in the process by the city. Whose fault is that?

Read the City of Lemoore's own website (Plan 2030 and agenda/minutes for the planning commission) and read all the evidence for yourselves. "

aufever wrote on Apr 22, 2008 4:58 PM:

" I can understand why the farmers want to get rid of the land, it's just about the worst ground in the area and besides being clay which is unstable when wet and full of Alkali. I lived in Cimarron Park 36 years ago and the house that I lived in had the back corner of the kitchen settle and a large crack in the floor. It was extremely hard to get a lawn to grow and the city wants to develop it, Bah Humbug. "

Concerned wrote on Apr 23, 2008 6:33 AM:

" I just can't hardly believe that the city wants to let homes be built out there. Those homes will all have foundation issues because of the awful ground out there. Doesn't anyone know of all the issues the owner in Cimarron Park have? New home owners will have more complaints over that then the noise, And what about that smell that comes from Leprinos! Oh my!! Its awful. These homes would only turn out to be a thorn in Lemoores side. Another bad area.
I say why not just let it be commerical buildings out there. Put some shopping out there for the residents of Lemoore. No one is buying the new homes in the already being built new sud-divisons of Lemoore. Who in their right minds would buy a home out thre? I am so very sick of Lemoore's city planners. Just plan on building new homes and no new jobs. What kind of town do they want here? They are only going to end up with alot of have developed homes and no one to live in them. I myself is considering moving from Lemoore after living here over 40 years I just can hardly stand it. "

jose Chavez wrote on Apr 23, 2008 6:52 AM:

" In my opinion, the communty needs Lemoore NAS, the problem is that the community needs to realized that we needs this base for economic reason. It is easier to move a community than a whole fleet of aircraft, why doesn't the city of Lemoore try to move eastword toward Armona. For those who don't like the nosie, they should relocate or where ear plugs. "

Fly Navy wrote on Apr 23, 2008 1:42 PM:

" The Planning Commission made the only acceptable decision available to them. If they had voted to accept the General Plan as presented, the incompatible zoning could have triggered the F-35 being stationed some other place. If they had voted to get rid of all residential uses the whole process would have started over. That would have opened the land for far more development.

Their recommendation was to allow for about 3,500 people. The remaining land that they didn't make a recommendation for can and should be stripped of residential development after the AICUZ study is finished. The residential development can then be moved to the north and east of town.

I agree with Sid on at least one of his points. Capt Townsend attended a steering committee meeting very early in the process. His comments should have prompted staff to do far much more than they did, only dropping the anticipated population from 10,000 to 7,000. City staff should have looked at the plan objectively and done the right thing before the plan was ever brought before the planning commission. "

Fly Navy wrote on Apr 23, 2008 2:14 PM:

" Several steering committee members have spoken out, saying that what was in the proposed General Plan was not what they wanted or recommended. The steering committe said one thing, city staff disregarded them and did what they wanted to do. One of the steering committee members even spoke at a public hearing asking the Planning Commission to disregard what was in the proposal and "do the right thing."

When City Council opens their public hearing I sincerely hope that every citizen in Lemoore makes their opinion heard, whether they agree with the proposal or not.

I agree with the author of the above article. There needs to be more discussion before a final vote is taken. There is one subdivision already approved with about 350 homes. None of these homes have any mitigations for noise.

It seems to be very easy for city staff, the landowner, the developers and Dr. Frank Gornick to say that the noise won't bother anyone. I believe that they should purchase the first homes built in Victory Village, or perhaps keep their self-serving opinions to themselves. "

questions wrote on Apr 26, 2008 5:48 PM:

" How is it that developers and builders were already approved to build houses. Now, we the city have to worry about a liability lawsuit. Here is a plan that citizens of Lemoore should pass.GET RID OF OUR CITY PLANNERS AND CITY COUNCIL. We should do it behind close doors as well. We will let them tell us why we should not get rid of them. We would just listen with a dead ear like they do at the council meetings. Then we would get rid of them all. If Lemoore is so short of housing develoments why hasn't the subdivison on east D St. been completed? Will the City send them a weed abatement letter please.......... "

Louis wrote on Apr 29, 2008 2:05 PM:

" Once again I have to say, we need new knowledgable blood in the City Counsel and Planning Commission as I am ashame to admit that I reside in Lemoore. We are the laughing stock of the community. We need NAS Lemoore, they do not need us. We have empty new homes in town that can't sell why create new ones especially in that area...Stupid, Stupid...Who are the Piederson's paying off on the counsel? "

Sid wrote on Apr 30, 2008 2:48 PM:

" Reread the article above which states:

"If Lemoore goes ahead with the general plan, it could risk unwanted urban encroachment in the base buffer zone, potentially costing future expansion of Navy operations in Lemoore that contributes $300 million a year to the local economy."

The "future expansion" isn't the only thing in jeopardy, it is the outright CLOSURE of the base that is a possibility due to deliberate encroachment.

Article continues:

"If the city rejects the plan completely, it could expose itself to liability from developers who have already been given approval to build houses there and landowners who have invested millions of dollars in the area for city-led improvements."

It doesn't have to reject the plan completely. Place more commercial & industrial (jobs) in the area in question, not houses.

As an aside, I would like to see a detailed list of the "millions" invested for a fairer assessment.

Regardless, how much profit is enough? Commercial/industrial development over houses?

"

Yes...included in the plan are also low-income housing areas... wrote on Apr 30, 2008 7:16 PM:

" West Hills College desires a plan to create low-income multi-unit family apartments&student housing units drawing in out-of-towner's whom already lack in skills/common-sense.

Great...confined to the out-skirts of town! Now maintenance patrols for those communities.

Wow....a new attraction for gang activities, street crimes, narcotics and auto thefts.Bet all the Leprino employee's & West Hills students will love those types in that area in the future.

Yes, more low-income concentrated communities.Yeah...how much do Lemoore citizen's want their already small re-active city police to be patroling that large an area.Industrial communities are not attractive or safe!

West Hills College campus must be ready to lose their already fairly safe facility to exposure to unwanted traffic, tagging and theft-vandalism, ect.

Lemoore City Council has approved all that!Big time problem area for the future I say...for an already undermaned, limited City Police Department in town to already strained personnel and resources!The visual appearance of the facility sits like a small ghost like facade with little traffic, very telling.

Where are all these points covered in the plan to expand the college campus in that alkai desert? "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts