Jack wrote on May 6, 2008 1:23 PM:
" Bravo!!
It will never happen, but how great it would be if he did step down. "
gabe cano wrote on May 6, 2008 4:38 PM:
" Mr Beavers , please get off your high horse. Mr Dowd is a honest man. If he saids that his services required him to submit his fee's at a higher rate,. So be it. Mr Dowd is a long time local servant and he deserves better than a out of town writer to belittle him. "
ALEJANDRO wrote on May 6, 2008 6:51 PM:
" I have nothing but respect for Mr. Beaver's opinion. I first encountered him when I worked for Kern County in 1975 and he was writing for the local paper and was also on television as a legal commentator.
His advice has been well-vetted and documented since then. We all should take pause and listen to him! "
Well Done wrote on May 6, 2008 7:58 PM:
" Well done Mr. Beaver, you hit on all the right points, unfortunately, Bob will never step down. He likes the money too much. He has his fingers in all of the pots here in Kings County. Just take a look at the candidates he supports. He has so many of them in his back pocket that he has a hard time sitting down! "
Girl Friday wrote on May 6, 2008 8:17 PM:
" When can we expect Mr. Dowd to print a rebuttle to your story I can't wait and who will he bill the hours to???????? Oh yeah us!!!!!!!! "
To gabe cabo wrote on May 6, 2008 10:50 PM:
" The truth must hurt. Instead of sitting back and thinking about the real motive; money grabbing vs public servant, you attack Beaver. The problem with this town is that there is very few with power because the rest of us have given it to them. Then, instead of serving the community, they take advantage and hold the rest back. You don't think so? Drive to Tulare and look at that growth. Drive to Visalia and look at the services that are provided. The last quaint thing we have is downtown and all the council has done with that is turn it in to a weekly party spot. It is dead on the east end. And now we have a look at the City Attorney that was hired because members of the council "owed" him that. And he took advantage of it. If the Council felt any sense of commuinty they would have reported that they were going to blow the budget. Instead, they got caught not paying attention and Dowd got caught with both hands in the cookie jar. He is only being defended by people who have been convicted of felonies and ended up with probation. wake up! "
Dowd-No integrity wrote on May 7, 2008 12:15 AM:
" Dowd discredits the profession of a military officer; military officers follow the standards of duty, honor, and country and high ethical standards. An officer does not disgrace the uniform by bottom dwelling in the double talk of a politican- who will say and do anything for their own gain. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 7, 2008 1:32 AM:
" Step down my foot lets kick his money grubbing butt to the curb and see how that looks on his resume. I can see the headlines in the Sentinel now "Former City Attorney Fired" by resounding decision of the electorate in the City of Hanford. Afterall isn't that how the City Council does it when they have a falling out with a city employee, fire them then bring a lawsuit against them? If it's good for the goose should be good for the gander, right? Meet you at the first meeting to dethrown his lawyership in front of the civic auditorium come this next Saturday at high noon. Be there or be square, well I guess if you are there you will be in the square, wouldn't you? "
JC wrote on May 7, 2008 11:14 AM:
" Is there anyone out there that expects a lawyer to be honest and keep his word?...If the city managers where doing their jobs correctly, they would have put every little detail in writing on the contract. If he was willing to accept a contract at $250K knowing that was a very low bid, then the city should have done what lawyers do best, take advantage of the opportunity and put it in writing!!!!!!!! If he was willing to accept, then the city would only be binded to pay what was in the contract, wouldn't it????...... "
Conflict wrote on May 7, 2008 11:16 AM:
" Beaver works for the Sentinel (or it's parent company) so do you think he's going to disagree with them? Did Beaver talk to Dowd about his contract or did he just review what the Sentinel had "found"? Most people think every City hall is corrupt. Go ahead and fire him, see what you'll get, an out of town lawyer that won't reinvest in our community. Remember the city didn't prossecute Christenson or Reynolds, the DA did and the Brown act issue was here BEFORE Dowd was. It doesn't surprise me all the hatred here as most people have a GENERAL dislike for laywers. "
ALL FOR HIS STEPPING DOWN wrote on May 7, 2008 1:24 PM:
" CONFLICT - Sounds like you might be an attorney yourself, perhaps for the same law firm as Mr. Dowd? Mr. Dowd's character is within balance with the new City Manager five out of five of the City Council Members, you are correct why should we complain we put them there? But we also have the power to remove them, then what Mr. Attorney? I wouldn't be hanging my hat on a man who has publicly lied to the entire community and then ripped it off of hundreds of thousands of it's tax payers money. This guy probably not only will lose the city job he'll probably never get another client in the city limits of Hanford. The injustice he has done to the city and to his own law firm and their associates is appalling to say the least. To stand before a body representing the city and saying regardless of the manhours you will only be charged $250,000.00 to get the contract and then reverse it, is paramount to fraud in anyone's law book. How does a judge or another lawyer respect a liar who professes to be a professional? "
ALL FOR HIS STEPPING DOWN wrote on May 7, 2008 1:38 PM:
" We would do better to hire somone fresh out of law school with no repurtation as to continue with Mr. Dowd who's sully reputation will be cause for many unfavorable decisions on matters he brings before the court system. There is a certain integrity, professionalism, character, and expertise in one's field that dictates their success. Mr. Dowd by his own admission has less experience working as a City Attorney than any of the other qualified firms who bid on this position. Why put something out for bid if you already have your mind made up through favors you owe one of the bidders? I can see this matter one day going before the California Supreme Court and Mr. Dowd having to admit he quoted a singular never to be raised fee in order to obtain the position then met with the City Manager, City Council to have that commitment replaced with verbage that allowed larger and separate fees. The Magistrate will laugh him out of the courtroom, and chasten the City Council for its remarkable suspect actions. Should that day come I will be appluading the Judges decision. "
Proud Dad wrote on May 7, 2008 3:36 PM:
" Nice accounting...Hanford continued to write the checks after the $250,000 "limit" was reached. "
a concerned citizen wrote on May 7, 2008 3:53 PM:
" Too bad the City made a series of bad decisions, especially concerning its witch hunt against Michael Noland leading to the need to put out to bid the city attorney work. Mr. Noland's honest and dedicated advice, at a fair price, was unfortunately turned aside and now look where Hanford finds itself. I imagine someone will be footing this bill and that's everyone who lives within the sphere of the city! "
WOW wrote on May 7, 2008 4:21 PM:
" WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND DOESNT IT.
"
robert wrote on May 7, 2008 4:48 PM:
" I trust bob dowd. Keep up the good work. "
To robert wrote on May 7, 2008 9:16 PM:
" You can't fool us a second time. We know that its really you Bob! Trying to fake us out again! "
To Robert wrote on May 7, 2008 9:39 PM:
" You go ahead and trust him all you want. The rest of know he has lied and cheated this city and is continuing to so with the help of a lousy city counsel. This city government needs to be overthrown and removed they obviously have no real loyality to the citizens of this city only to a select few who can profit from their sloppy decisions. Blue Falcon if you have the time you have my vote. "
RE-DO my contract wrote on May 7, 2008 10:49 PM:
" Dude, if Dowd can just change his contract, I am going to start just cutting my fees on the water bill, trash and house taxes. If Bobby can do it so can I. "
graphic comparison wrote on May 8, 2008 12:14 AM:
" Asking a lawyer to give up money is like asking a vampire to give up blood. What's the difference between a lawyer and a blood sucking vampire?
Only the lawyer can walk during daylight hours. LOL! "
TM wrote on May 8, 2008 9:09 AM:
" City of Hanford hIred an attorney and got a car salesman. At least with a car - you drive and get a WARRANTY "
Retired Attorney wrote on May 8, 2008 9:29 AM:
" I watch in not-so-surprised amazment this whole episode which should be an embarrassment to our City Council and our cituizens, but apparently is not. Robert Dowd has always been the consummate self-promoter (to put it kindly), but I did not know he is so lacking in basic integrity and dignity. Dan Chin has always viewed himself as a pseudo-power broker, has been deceitful with his own fellow Council persons, and manipulative with the citizenry. Continuing to elect Mr. Chin, and those who unwaveringly follow him, has resulted in Mr. Dowd, and this embarrassment to our community and to the legal bar. The unmitigated gall of Mr. Chin and Mr. Dowd is an insult to not just our community, but I suspect also to our City staff and employees. To me, this is a self-inflicted wound which must be healed. Mr. Dowd will never resign, therefor, he should be replaced. Otherwise, immediate action by our Grand Jury, law enforcment, and the citizenry must ensue. This is clear to me, and should be clear to all. "
Spelled Out wrote on May 8, 2008 4:32 PM:
" Bravo to you Mr. Beaver for being able to say what we "taxpayers" have wanted to stand up and say.
A man is no better than his word, I think that makes my opinion pretty obvious. It just makes me sick to know that the rich get richer in this town on the backs of the taxpayers through the Council.
We'll NEVER get rid of the problem unless this town screams about the injustices. This town is aware but the proper authorities apparently do not exist in Mayberry II aka Hanford as we're all being used to foot the bill for the countless absurdities of the Council.
This isn't really about Dowd's contract is it? If that is the case why are we prosecuting two former City Manager's, one for perjury (or pissing off someone on the Council) and the other for misuse of City Money? We've spent more on the attorney fees than it was worth; if it even occurred to begin with.
Wake up and get mad people. They cannot possibly be related to everyone, are they? "
Who is this guy wrote on May 8, 2008 4:36 PM:
" What is most disturbing to me, as a veteran, is that he was once an officer. He, at least at one time in his life, had made a promise to a very high standard of honor and ethics. What a shame. That old saying "Once a Marine, always a Marine" ... although I served in another branch, I have many friends in the Marines, all who would not consider his conduct becoming of a Marine or an officer. Shame on you Dowd. "
rg wrote on May 8, 2008 5:39 PM:
" Sometimes you have to pay someone a little more money to save a lot of money. I think the city council may have learned that they have made mistakes in the past and needed to hire someone who is respected as one of the best attorneys in the state, OH by the way if you believe all of what you read in the HANFORD SENTINEL you need to go talk to DR. PHIL "
BJMallory wrote on May 8, 2008 5:53 PM:
" "Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
Who steals my purse steals trash; 'tis something, nothing;
'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed."
Othello Act 3, scene 3 "
BJMallory wrote on May 8, 2008 5:57 PM:
" "Reputation, reputation, reputation! O! I have lost my reputation. I have lost the immortal part of myself and what remains is bestial."
Cassio, Othello Act 2, scene 3 "
CC WATCHDOG wrote on May 8, 2008 6:09 PM:
" Mr. Dowd you bragged and went on and on about how proud you were of your service in the United States Marine Corps when you were interviewed for the position of City Attorney. I am going to the archives to retrieve those statements, requesting minutes of the council meeting whereby you stated regardless of manhours you were only going to charge $250,000.00 per year, asking the Hanford Sentinel for copies of their billings they have solicited and received (public record) and I am going to package it all up and send copies to the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy, Chief of Naval Personnel,
Commandant of the Marine Corps, Judge Advocate General Commanding Officer NAS Lemoore. I want them all to know what good citizenship, leadership, honesty, loyalty you are exhibiting in your day to day life as a former Marine Officer and new City Attorney. How's that saying go "Once a Marine Always a Marine"? You don't have to Thank me, the pleasure is all mine. Good luck
The Military Takes Care of It's Own.
"
darrie wrote on May 8, 2008 6:19 PM:
" Once a lawyer, always a lawyer. Mr. Dowd is indeed not aman of his word. "
SJT wrote on May 8, 2008 8:20 PM:
" Hanford's own Culture of Corruption.. Has me thinking maybe I'll have to start attending these city council meetings again - it's been too long. It would be great to see all the butts in those seats watching, listening and taking the podium. Journalist & reporters standing in the back - taking copious notes and the public scanning the daily newspaper the next day on what was said - who was over-paid, who wasn't qualified for the position given him. Challenging the power brokers who would otherwise get pretty much what they want. Sounds fun to me. Then meet for ice cream afterward. Anyone want to join me? "
Ellis wrote on May 8, 2008 8:45 PM:
" Sorry but sales consultants at auto dealerships are rated above Lawyers, Politicians, and Carnies in the most hated job survey's. Good try though "
Cindy wrote on May 8, 2008 11:05 PM:
" I have been around the block a few times and have worked with the general public for approx 25 years the couple of times I worked with Bob Dowd he totally impressed me with his kind nature and the way he treated me with the up most respect. He made a lasting good impression on me and I can't say that about everyone. I was glad I got the opportunity to work with him and his wife. There is probably more to the story that we don't know and we have no right judge him. Newspapers can hurt people!!!! "
Dont forget the contract wrote on May 9, 2008 8:52 AM:
" Hey CC. Don't forget to get a copy of his original contract. It just might explain all the extras. That's the only thing that hasn't been mentioned yet or are people afraid that the contract just might explain all the extras that people here think pertain to the "coruption". Can't hurt to be fully informed. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 10:03 AM:
" To SJT - sounds like a plan to me, but we may want the ice cream first, after we see our City Council at work we may not have the stomach for it afterwards. Perhaps we could set there and ignore them the way they ignore us, I guess they could counsel us on our behavior while spending 3 million on silencing the train whistles. I become so angry with them, Perhaps what we should do is attend a meeting and put each and every one of them on notice that a serious campaign is being iniciated to recall each and every one of them, we don't even need a special election, we can just add all their names to the ballot in November. It is a done deal Marcie Bufford and Dan Chin will be finished after this next election anyway. That's two down three to go and we might get some change for the citizens instead of the City Council. All we need is five ingtelligent, articulate, caring unbiased people to run for their positions. I think a few people who know what it is to struggle to make ends meet, "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 10:15 AM:
" To SJT - perhaps you might consider a run. I'm sure you know how to balance a check book and pay your bills without spending 3 million on something that is a part of the history of Hanford. Silence the Council not the Trains could be your motto. Give away Council seats not city streets could be another. Being in business in the city in Hanford isn't all about cheese. The list goes on and on if you spend a little time thinking about it. If it weren't so detrimental to our friends families and community it might even be comical.
If we could do away with bringing law suits against Hanford City Managers and Department Heads we might be able to fix city streets, clean up graffitii faster, provide more police and fire personnel and give all city employees the tools necessary to perform their duties. When you have a history of reelection like Dan and Marcie you become Godlike, you think you can do no wrong, so maybe it isn't all their fault. Chin, Bufford and Ayers act like they founded this community. Namesake train pay master get it. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 12:38 PM:
" Don't forget the contract - I haven't I addressed that in another blog. Dowd should be prosecuted for his contract just like Jan is, Jan said he presented a contract the city doesn't mention having it, Dowd says he changed his contract but it's never been presented for the voters to see. Same situation should be same result. Only difference is Jan never took the money, Dowd did and bought an entire city block with it. Besides once the information is received a full unbiased investigation will be forthcoming, trust me. Don't forget there are current JAG's serving in Lemoore. Dishonor is dishonor, simply giving your word and going back on it is evidence of betrayal and demonstrates disloyalty to the community as a whole. He stood before an entire body of Hanford citizens who can be witnesses to his sworn statement "should he receive the contract, he would not charge more than $250,000.00". Don't get me wrong I feel the City Council is also culpable. These are not acts of a Marine Corps Officer, especially a former JAG Officer who should know better. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 12:50 PM:
" People of Hanford, how soon we forget. The City Council said it would not let Serpa Auto Sales out of their year long contract, even though they wouldn't be using the porperty. Yet they let Bob Dowd charge us $150,000.00 or more over his sworn testimony he would not charge more money. Dowd and the Council are in the same bed performing the same pea shell game. Their honesty, integrity, loyalty, word all run on the same derailed train track. Have you ever heard the word conspiracy, sullied contract, malfeasance they have failed to act with the trust we bestowed upon them as our elected officials. There was also an enormous loss of city funds and profits were derived from their actions which could show and demontrate criminal intent. This one act alone could and should stand as evidence to recall each and every one who agreed with this costly decision. Mr. Beaver, how say you? I am not an attorney but you are? Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official is the wikepedia deffinition. "
Randy wrote on May 9, 2008 1:35 PM:
" Well isn't everyone just all up in arms over something that is pretty much SOP. You retain an attorney for "standard" consultations and minutae that require legal advice throughout the term of a contract, but that contract will 99 times out of 100 have provisions stating that duties beyond the regular scope of work will be billed. After all, three lawsuits in one year? I doubt any of the other bidders to represent Hanford would have eaten those additional costs either.
Watchdog - have you pulled your papers yet? After all, you've got to have replacements ready if you're going to recall everyone. Please find out if you can serve on the CC and both school boards at the same time since you've positioned yourself as the savior we've all been waiting for. I look forward to seeing how you will do so much better than those we've elected. Something tells me you'll be the subject of many rants if you run and win. "
Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 6:21 PM:
" To Randy - I am not self appointed anything your pals have made this a no brainer. The Key Stone cops would have loved this material, personal vendetta against Jan first prosecution of a City Manager, vendetta against second City Manager hence second lawsuit, City Travel Bureau Department Head steals $15,500.00 and who may we blame for those appointments? Three lawsuits brought about by five peoples decisions who had better have their next jobs lined up. Don't blame me for their inept judgement and malfeasance in office they and they alone are to blame for that. Then they give away a city street without any form of compensation. Eliminate an emergency route to I don't know how many other businesses on that same street at least six that I know of without planning for an alternative route. They add to emergency response time I thought it was through their cooperation a duty to reduce response times not increase them. Who's liable for that one, not the cheese company. Not one time has the Council put this before the people. The people they are suppose to represent. "
Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 6:36 PM:
" To the citizens who may not be familar with SOP that is short for Standard Operating Procedure. Do we want our Council to continue on this law suit happy pursuit of Standard Operating Procedure? First of all, the city brought these suits not those being charged. I have only seen one that is warranted and should continue to trial. Misenhimer learned from Jan so he got his money up front, Dowd learned from Noland and did the same thing. He came across using that good ol' boy I am gonna return something back to Hanford crap and shafted us royaly, if I want a lube job, I know where to go. I think Randy must be a relative or very close friend or Bob Dowd in disquise. When you present the evidence and speak their language they get a little irate, don't they. They probably didn't think anyone from Hanford could know a word like malfeasance. All I can say is the evidence of guilt is there it is up to the citizens of Hanford to pursue it. "
Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 6:42 PM:
" Randy - if I did serve on the City Council the first thing I would do is contact Ron Calhoun and ask him to drop both cases against the City Managers and prosecute the true thief at the Visitors Bureau to the fullest extent of the law. Now think about it how much money would those three actions save not only the community but two men who wanted to do right for this community until they stepped on the wrong toes. The minute Mr. Christensen said audit other city departments he was history, why? What is the City of Hanford and the City Council as a body hiding from us? Most Municipalities welcome audits it bolsters their trust within the community, but not ours, why? They'll spend 3 million dollars to silence the trains but they don't want to spend the money to prove they are spending the money the way we directed them to as our leaders, whats wrong with that picture? If the city is in the black as they claim what harm is there in performing a audit, even spot checks some checks and balances. Businesses do routinely. "
Watchdog wrote on May 9, 2008 6:49 PM:
" Randy - has anyone in this city ever heard a City Councilman or Mayer step forward and give a speech about the state of affairs in the city of Hanford? Why not, why not inform the public of all the good you have done in the community over the last year, what it has cost them and what still needs to be accomplished. It's called a city vision, plan and situational conference notifying taxpayers what Council Members are doing even behind closed doors. Not having any minutes released on closed door sessions is not good practice why should a Council person deserve anonimity on any vote or decision? I say again televise the meetings and Comcast will probably present them free of charge to the community in Hanford that are shut ins and can't attend the meetings, why not what are you hiding from us? So Randy if you like my ideas get behind the candidate I choose to support and you'll get some results. Because I've said it before if it wasn't for health reasons, I would give these bumbs a run for their money. "
Alan G. wrote on May 9, 2008 7:37 PM:
" CC Watchdog, why don't you throw your hat in the ring? I think it's time to run the mob out of Vegas and you seem pretty knowledgeable on the inner workings of the city. "
To Watchdog wrote on May 10, 2008 5:49 PM:
" You "seem" pretty smart, but your not. First of all, you cannot make the DA drop charges as a council person. He is an independant prosecutor and is the person who filed charges not the CC. Secondly, since you know so much, then you know that the city is audited annually by an independent firm. Thirdly, you should already know that when you take shots at city management, you know that they have NO SAY in what benefits they recieve. Only Police, Fire, and the General Unit have bargaining units and contracts. Superintendents, Supervisors, engineers and others in middle management positions get what the City Council and City Manager gives them! Lastly, as smart as you are, then you already know that the City of Hanford is one of the only jurisdictions around that is still "in the black". Clovis is cutting positions, Tulare City is MILLIONS in the red, Kings County is looking at budget cuts due to the Gov.'s revised budget. As for the lawsuits, lets blame Andy Mattos and Harriman D.B.A.HEAT, HTA etc. And this person is running for Supervisor. Go ahead Sentinel...Censor me again!!! "
Retired Attorney wrote on May 10, 2008 6:49 PM:
" Cindy, I'm sure you like Bob Dowd. He is a genial guy. But thats not the issue. An attorney should never become "the issue" for his client, and Mr. Dowd has become the issue. In fact, he has made himself the issue by his conduct. We were all talking about Mr. Dowd a year ago, and we are still talking about him. None of it flattering. This is not good for our community, and if he had an ethical bone in his body, he would reign. But I've known Mr. Dowd for years, and he won't resign. His client should fire him and get this over with. "
Hmmmmmm wrote on May 11, 2008 12:49 AM:
" Wonder if Mr. Misenhimer, Mr. Dowd and the City Council were involved with setting up the job annoucement flyers for Deputy City Manager. What a joke, it seems the position requires much more of an education than what the city manager has. So I would suggest all you high school grads get yourselves on down to the city offices and apply for this job. If you are singled out due to lack of educations I say sue the city for discriminations. Afterall if Misenhimer doesn't have to have the educations requirements why should an assistant??? "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 11:46 AM:
" In response to the response to CC Watchdog - funny how these creeps won't even use a name they choose to continually respond to my comments. Perhaps that says something about their own limited capabilities. First of all I would not order the DA to do anything, if you bother to read my comment I believe I said I would ask him to drop the charges, secondly by who's insistance did the DA pursue this idget could it have possibly been Mr. Dowd and the City Council you know they do talk to one another. Alrighty then the money is already budgeted for the audit and so providing a copy to the citizens of Hanford wouldn't be a problem, conducting a news conference to announce the results, discuss what the wonderful city council did for the community during that period wouldn't be impossible now would it? Didn't the city council just try to adopt a raise in the stiphen, what do you mean they have no say, were you born in the midwest? Finally, I don't live in those other communities so I don't care if they are in the red, but nice try. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 11:52 AM:
" In response to the response to CC Watchdog - funny how these creeps won't even use a name they choose to continually respond to my comments. Perhaps that says something about their own limited capabilities. (CONTINUED) Perhaps I did know all of these things and you just help me make my point clearer than ever. You just responded to my suggestions of keeping the city informed, which if done at a news conference by the City Council could make them look less like the deceitful, inept, behind closed door clowns they have become to this city. When you hire a liar as City Attorney, Give away Streets to businesses, Bring lawsuits against all the city managers over the past fifteen or twenty years, allow a Department Head to obtain a credit card and charge $15,500.00, you might expect some citizens to take some shots at you. But again why aren't they announcing the city plan for growth, justice and the american way, because they don't have one that's why. Mr. Dowd hasn't given it to them yet. But you are right I do know enough to set a trap for you, Spanky! "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 12:04 PM:
" I guess in some of my commentaries I may have fallen short in spelling out my reason for participating in these issues. I grew up in Hanford just like all these clowns who are ripping this city off and it pains me to see them getting away with it. As another person said Dan Chin has thrown his fellow Council Members under th bus on more than one event. The rest of them just kind of set there and look at Chin and Bufford as if they had control of their brain stems, it's discusting to watch. Cursing and name calling do not belong in a city council meeting how unprofessional as is most of their actions. I brought up the term malfeasance the other day and the responses have been getting stronger and stronger to my comments but like the decisions of the City Council they seem to be resonating from one or two who completely refuse to even pretend they aren't who we know they are by creatively selecting a name to use. Kind of like the way they run the City Council. No creativity, common sense or goals. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 12:19 PM:
" I'm curious how will the other three members of the City Council function when Chin and Bufford aren't relected? They still have the controlling votes so I guess they will have to look for guidance through Mr. Misenhimer and especially Mr. Dowd, just the way Bob wants it. Bob's firm represents HWHS and his nephew is Principal, what's wrong with that picture? I am beginning to see a pattern for Mr. Dowd and his law firm here, does anyone else smell a rat? Perhaps a new Principal selection might be in order as well to prevent this nepitism? This would not be allowed in the private sector. CONFLICT OF INTEREST, I'm sure that anyone brining a lawsuit against the school would love to have that tidbit, does that have to be announced in disclosure at trial? It should be, boy the information never stops flowing about Mr. Dowd and his connections. I guess money can by anything afterall. That's what we are up against folks it's the have nots versus the haves a lots, but our votes outweigh their money, keep that in mind. It's why they can't say no. "
ALEJANDRO wrote on May 11, 2008 5:49 PM:
" A simple question:
WHY does our small, quaint town need a Deputy City Manager anyway? Can't we save some money here for legal bills and whatnot?
I mean, the current manager we have has done so great a job all by himself with his education and experience. He just got a big fat raise to reward him for his achievements.
Well, I guess every bureaucracy needs a chief underling to assign all of the work to.
Great to see our government in action! Spare no expense to govern us, folks. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 7:32 PM:
" To Cindy = could the reason he hasn't responded because he knows it is truth and fact something he isn't use to dealing with in any form other than his stretched and revised contractual ways. The City Council is and will continue to pay their price for allowing Mr. Dowd to change up a contract issued through the bidding process. They will suffer the consequences for his lies and sullied contract negotiations, but Mr. Dowd himself is going to answer for his own actions as well. We the community will see to that in many ways and many forms just as he uses his methods to accomplish his end so shall we. If that is what it takes to replace him and to bring creditability back to the City Attorneys office then so it shall happen. I too agree the City Attorney Position should be a full time occupation and I believe there are some attorney's right here in the community who would perform the duties with integrity, honesty, loyalty to the community and for the $250,000.00 salary. Bob Dowd is not the only attorney in Kings County. "
CC Watchdog wrote on May 11, 2008 7:54 PM:
" If we really think that Dowds power reaches to the Grand Jury, there are other steps that can be taken. A complaint to the California State Attorney Generals Office can be made. Which if all the evidence is presented a thorough investigation would be forthcoming. They have the ability to reach out and touch any power, or power to be in this community with supeona powers the city doesn't even have. Which could be the weapon used to break up the good ol boy/gal network with the state doing the investigation/prosecutions and picking up the bill. You want to see rats jump ship just hit them with a supeona and think their butts are on the line and the answers will come spilling from their mouths as to who is and isn't connected to Bob Dowd and the City Council, The billing fees exceeded easily the requirement for grand theft by a city official, hence the collusion could be ascertained to make all Council members culpable in a scheme to defraud the citizens of Hanford. Malfeasance and Grand Theft look them up fellow citizens and tell me they don't fit the situation. "
Thank You wrote on May 12, 2008 10:08 AM:
" To - "To Watchdog", Wow you didn't get censored! I think your 100% correct. The DA is going to keep going after the COH regardless becasue of his past. If any of you, Watchdog, don't know about the DA and Jan please look into it. It deals with union negotiation and the DA losing. I also agree that Harriman, Mattos, HEAT, HTA, NO on Wally world and any of the other memberless groups, have helped the city spend all the extra to, not only Dowd, but I'm sure to other people also. Has anyone ever wondered what ever happened to all those lawsuits? The get filed, then you never hear about them again........... "
No - thank you wrote on May 12, 2008 11:08 PM:
" So "thank you" I believe that as a condition of the City of Hanford approving a building project they make the developer hold the city harmless for any legal claims that come from the project approval. This means that if the city and developer have a lawsuit filed against them, the developer is on the hook for the city's legal fees as well. It light of this fact your rantings blaming the various groups who have filed lawsuits against developers and the city are without merit. The city has the option of recouping any legal fees from the developer and their hired consultants. If the City of Hanford is failing to enforce this provision against the these parties perhaps the relationship between the developers/consultants legal counsel and that of the city should be examined. If you are really curious about what has happened in the lawsuits filed by the various groups you mention, go to the courthouse and ask to see a copy of the case. Any settlement is part of the record and available for public inspection. It would be interesting to see some reporting in this paper on the settlements you mentioned. "
Watchdog wrote on May 12, 2008 11:35 PM:
" To Thank You - I think I know Ron Calhoun well enough to know he isn't going to let negotiations from years past effect his good judgement. The City Council is the vendetta machine in this city not Ron Calhoun and the DA's Office. However, It does make me ponder why the prosecution of David Hawk, probably one of the most notorious cases in Hanford has been put on the back burner and all this political prosecution seems to be pushed forward, there must be a significant reason for that happening. I just haven't heard it explained from either the DA's Office or the City Council or Attorney Dowd. Since Attorney Dowd cited both of the prosecutions of the former City Managers as part of the added expense for his services, how say you City Attorney? Did you have envolvement with the prosecution or not, did you bill the city for it or not? I'm beginning to wonder with all the rhetoric of late if the Brown Act thing wasn't collusion to cover up the friendships involved in this city. DA prosecutes City Council, Dowd rushes to the rescue, kind of convenient. "
Watchdog wrote on May 12, 2008 11:44 PM:
" To Thank You - I just don't want to believe the brothers I went to Hanford High with could either one be involved in this vendetta machine the City Council seems to have working for it. Surely Ron wouldn't waste taxpayer money on a personal revenge over losing in negotiations that happened years ago, that isn't the Ron Calhoun I remember. The Ron I remember knew very well right from wrong and how to determine the best interest of one or five over the best interest of an entire community. So until proven otherwise I still support the District Attorney and his office until he or they convince me my loyalty is misplaced. I've watched him and his entire family become the focus of the political discussion in this community time and again because they show support for their son which any parent would do. We don't hang our parent hats at the door when we report for work ladies and Gentlemen. Stop and think about it, woud you?
But it still amazes me that we are wasting money on senseless, frivolous law suits when the city claims that is what citizens do. "
A little math wrote on May 13, 2008 9:17 AM:
" Christenson ...$1,100,
Criminal charges filed.
Reynolds....$140,000 + (who know how much more?)
Criminal charges filed,
Dowd...$400,000 + and still counting,
Firm keeps working for the city?
Something just doesn't seem right..
City Council has the authority to hire and fire City Attorney. Voters have the power to vote council members. If you care about this city, start doing something. Lipservice and blogging are summarily ignored. Actually doing something by getting off your duffs and organizing gets their attention.
Math rules.
"
Lynne wrote on May 13, 2008 10:37 AM:
" I too have lived in this town all my life and know Bob Dowd. I'm sure you will not see a response from him because he is a classy and intelligent man with an extremely successful practice. I'm sure he will ignore the Hanford Sentinel stories and blogs like the other 50,000 people in town that do not subscribe to it. Get a life CC - quit living through Bob Dowd's. "
the DA wrote on May 13, 2008 1:31 PM:
" If you think the DA is such a good guy, why is he retrying Christenson? Haven't we spent enogh on that? And Dowd, even though the City isn't the one pressing the issue, still has some work to do because the City involved with the case, not spearheading it, but they are still being drug into it. "
To Lynne wrote on May 13, 2008 2:46 PM:
" So what does that make you avid reader? "
Watchdog wrote on May 13, 2008 3:59 PM:
" the DA - You can thank your city administrators who took the charges against Mr. Christensen to the Police Department for the expenditures the DA is out on that particular case. But my question is if the DA works for the county does the city of Hanford have to reimburse the court costs and prosecution expenses in all these cases back to the county. Or is the county simply handing our taxpayers funds out without costing the city their taxpayers funds to pay for it. Oh I guess that would be like paying for it twice then wouldn't it, surely that isn't what is happening? They wouldn't chase frivolous lawsuits to receive monetary gain would they? It all looks pretty cut and dried to me drop the City Manager cases, prosecute the Department Head Thief and move on with city and county business. Why am I the only one who gets that concept. If I was Jan's attorney I would point to the money grubbing City Attorney and say if you prosecut my client you have to prosecute the new City Attorney, a contract is a contract. Common Sense. "
DA used to work for Dowd wrote on May 13, 2008 8:24 PM:
" Ron Calhoun and Dowd are good friends, Calhoun used to work for Dowd. Dowd + Calhoun = Good Old Boys. "
Get the facts wrote on May 14, 2008 8:50 AM:
" 2 city employees took the case to the Sheriff. I think the case agains the 2 former city managers deals with theft and perjury. The "case" you would like to bring against Dowd would be??? Theft? Perjury? He hasn't stolen anything and since everyone signed the contract he didn't didn't lie about it. Maybe some people didn't read it before signing?? That's dumb, but not a crime. People THINK a crime as been committed but if his contract allowed extras beyond 250K then it's not a crime. Some of you, well most, just don't like him and think i'ts part of some tangled web of deceit originating along Douty street. I must say it's been quite amusing reading these comments so keep it up as I'd hate to get bored!!!! "
Watchdog wrote on May 14, 2008 1:05 PM:
" To Get the Facts: O.K. now the questions begin why didn't they take their complaints to the Hanford City Council or the Hanford Police Department considering this matter concerned the cities money not the counties? They don't trust Chief Mestas to do his job and pass it on the to County DA. I smell two very big rats in this. According to your thinking the City Council had already voted and signed off on Jan's deal too and he was going to be paid the money, so why prosecute him? Does the term VENDETTA come to mind my friendly Get Your Facts Straight. They didn't take this to Mestas because Chief Mestas would have sent it back to the Council where it should have been dealt with in the first place. Our City Concil is infamous for stirring the pot but then want to jump back and not be in the open about it wants the pot begins to boil. Cowards one and all. If Mr. Dowd is the attorney people say he is why isn't he liked, why isn't he respected could it be because he is a liar? "
Watchdog wrote on May 14, 2008 1:17 PM:
" To Get the Facts: My facts are straight I said they took it to the cops, is Sheriff Jordan not a cop? But Why Jordan instead of Mestas that question still lingers unanswered. Perhaps because those two city employees are award that Chief Mestas knows their political shinanigans and wouldn't have pursued it. We have an unqualified City Attorney, an Unqualified City Manager, an Unqualified Assistant City Manager who were appointed by an Unqualified City Council. Yes those positions are appointed by the City Council. The City Manager cannot hire himself for that position, well usually he can't. Misenhimer is one step away from making a mistake that will prove me right aobut his qualificatins, all we have to do is stand back and watch it happen. Something tells me it will be a lulu. Why do we need an Assistant City Manager if Misenhimer is so qualified? Perhaps we should have an Assistant City Council in place as well? This isn't the Magic Kingdom at Disneyland with unlimited financial resources available to make evreryone's fantasy come true. Especially that Fantasy Land Bob Dowd wants. "
Watchdog wrote on May 14, 2008 1:23 PM:
" The Unqualifed leading, promoting and hiring more Unqualified to the detriment of this city. With the bucks we are paying Misenhimer and Dowd we could get the real thing instead of these fake likenesses. By the way remember the City Council signed off on and were willing to pay Jan his severance package, so who do you blame deep down inside who is responsible for that happening? I say the uninformed City Council, where was Dowd when that happened folks, he cares so much about the city. The only thing Bob Dowd has ever cared about is structuring this city so he has a clear path of leadership and his puppets in place to begin his take over and conquest of his city. All the while building a financial income unequal to any previous City Attorney in the land for a city this size. This isn't San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego which is how he is wanting to get paid. Do that position like all others make a comparison of like cities and pay that amount. A population of 50,000 is not capable of supporting a million dollar City Attorney. "
HanfordCitizen wrote on May 14, 2008 8:28 PM:
" To Watchdog: Keep checking those facts. There is no Assistant City Manager, it is a Deputy City Manager and it is not an appointed position. They are currently recruiting for another Deputy since Haglund left. The current Deputy meets the qualifications for the position. "
Retired Attorney wrote on May 14, 2008 9:14 PM:
" To Get The Facts, and others: If the original contract Mr. Dowd and the City entered into, regardless of Mr. Dowds public statements to the contrary, provided for more than the annual cap of $250,000.00, then please, someone, make the contract public for all to see. That would clear this whole thing up, quickly. If, however, the original contract does not provide for the cap as represented to the citizen's, then shame on our City Council, and Mr. Dowd musr step down. Misrepresentations by our City Attorney cannot be tolerated. Let's clear this up now, once and for all. "
Bobb wrote on May 15, 2008 11:18 AM:
" To Retired Attorney- I whole-heartedly agree. Let everyone see a copy of the contract and it should clear this matter up quickly. I am somewhat amazed that it has not been presented to date. It is a matter of record I assume. If changes were made at a latter date that should also be documented with the addendum and date of the change. "
Alan G. wrote on May 15, 2008 12:46 PM:
" I suspect that the public statement of a $250K salary cap was done to make his appointment more palatable to the townsfolk and I think the *asterisk* was purposely glossed over.
Or perhaps the intention all along was to okay the contract and then renegotiate it shortly afterwards in a quiet manner?
Personally, I believe a man's name is only as good as his word. If he stands up in front of people and states he will cap his salary at $250K and then exceeds that cap, the right and honorable thing to do would be to eat it.
"I will cap my salary at $250K annually.*
*For the purposes of this contract, when any verbal statements contradict written statements, the written statements shall stand. The word "I" shall pertain to the city Attorney only and shall not include the services of any other office staff which shall be billed separately. The term "annually" shall hereafter be defined as "semi-annually". The salary cap is for a limited period not to exceed the first 24 hours and then the rate shall re-adjust to $500K throughout the universe, in perpetuity. "
Roger Snow wrote on May 15, 2008 4:59 PM:
" Now running for city council, I will work towards firing Bob Dowd, adjusting police department pay to the average of five similar sized cities, more traffic police, never vote to close any streets for private concerns, promote downtown, demote Misenheimer for not meeting employment standards, allow Serpa out of their lease, ensure streets are clean, garbage is picked up, trains whistle, recycling is available to every home, bicycle lanes, safer streets, what else do you want? "
Watchdog wrote on May 15, 2008 6:07 PM:
" To Roger Snow - you almost had me till you mentioned silencing the trains. Sorry, that elimates you in my book. Nice try though. "
Jack wrote on May 15, 2008 10:59 PM:
" Roger Snow, you got it right!
Watchdog, he said "trains whistle" not silence the trains.
We should all boycott the entire Griswold firm and put all the pressure in the world on the city council to oust Dowd. Or they're out too!! "
Roger Snow wrote on May 16, 2008 12:12 AM:
" Watchdog, I will work to ensure that trains continue to whistle, too expensive to stop them! I would not even voted to conduct a study to determine if they can be silenced. "
Watchdog wrote on May 16, 2008 12:16 AM:
" Where do the citizens go to address the grievance we have with the contract negotiated and then renegotiated with Bob Dowd. Did any of the City Council members bother to get a concensous of their constituents prior to this appointment and how much it costs the city taxpayers? Evidently not because their are several of us on this blog and others that have voiced our disatisfaction with the behind closed door revisions and the gross injustice that was acted out by Mr. Dowd guaranteeing the citizens and the City Council what his fee schedule would be. At no time have I heard the words plus office costs, plus referral costs none of that was mentioned in his original verbal agreement and if it was in his written agreement then why hasn't it been produced for the electorate to see? Also if the City Council voted and accepted those changes why wasn't the public notified at once. Why did Dowd knowingly go over his agreed upon charges to the city prior to notifying anyone of changes he wanted made to his contract? That's kind of like taking our heart out instead of tonsils. "
KingsCottonBowl wrote on May 16, 2008 9:59 PM:
" To Calcot Members: Have we too be overcharged? "
Watchdog wrote on May 17, 2008 5:52 AM:
" Roger Snow -Thanks for the clarification. I agree money for a study that is known to be too expensive never should have been initiated. If you are serious and there is anything I can do to help you in your run for the City Council just let me know.
We are looking for people that care about the community instead of filling their own pockets with taxpayer monies. That's gone on long enough. "
Watchdog wrote on May 17, 2008 5:57 AM:
" To Jack and Roger - sounds like we are marching in step. We can't afford a City Council that thinks 500k a year plus add ons is a reasonable price to pay for a City Attorney. Two of the City Council, Dan Chin and Marcie Bufford come up for re-election this year. I'd love to replace them both with people of sound mind and common sense. We need to find out what district they are in and recruit people like Roger Snow to run against them. "
ALEJANDRO wrote on May 17, 2008 5:01 PM:
" I value forums like this because it gives us the opportunity to learn many pertinent facts.
I especially appreciate Watchdog because of all of the local history and details he presents to us. Notice that hardly anyone refutes the validity of his reporting, only the politics involved in their disclosure are criticized.
Personally, I know nothing about Roger Snow, but I would like to learn more. I really can support someone who will objectively evaluate the mistakes of local government and will actively work to remedy them. "
Watchdog wrote on May 18, 2008 12:52 AM:
" To Alejandro - once again I thank you for your support, however W.O.W. has brought it to my attention in another blog I should take a few days off, evidently not everyone appreciates my comments, guess they aren't use to people being honest with them. I have become rather wordy in some of my comments but sometimes you have to dig a little deeper to strike oil. So I will try and cut back, I do have to admit blogging can become addictive, so I plead guilty as charged. Too bad others in the community can't admit their mistakes, such as those in city government then my blogs could be less frequent and shorter in content. Now I know why commedians search the news for material, if a lot of the decisions being made in this community weren't so damaging they could be construed to be commical. Good Blogging Alejandro, Blue Falcon, Oracle, I will miss our discussions continue the good fight and I bid you ado. I will continue to read your blogs. "
RSS HanfordSentinel.com