First Rights: Mia Farrow's legacy letter to the president
By Nat Hentoff
While people in many countries are passionately involved in trying to end the Sudan government's ever-increasing genocide in Darfur, one person relentlessly embodying that determination who has caught the attention of the world is Mia Farrow. She and her son Ronan first nailed China's key financial -- and U.N. Security Council support -- of Sudan's genocidal Gen. Omar al-Bashir by describing China's August coming-out party as "the genocide Olympics."
On May 28, the former actress, who has become a world-class exposer of nations' crimes against their citizens, wrote a letter to George W. Bush that began: "I have just returned from my ninth trip to the region affected by the Darfur tragedy, now in its sixth year. I am writing to urge you to use the remaining months of your presidency to end the genocide in western Sudan and to make lasting peace in the region a legacy of your administration."
She continued by giving justified credit to the Bush administration's "essential role in securing the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) formally ending Sudan's (20-year) North-South Conflict (with 2 million dead)". That peace agreement, she told the president, is "fast unraveling and in urgent need of attention."
As is his brutal custom, Gen. Omar al-Bashir has steadily failed his obligations under that treaty, with a covetous eye on the South's oil-rich region. As Farrow noted in her letter, recent attacks by Sudan's army and its rapacious Janjaweed militia on Abyei in the South have torn more than 100,000 from their homes and may presage a second North-South War.
Turning to Darfur, her letter informed Bush that: "Government bombing campaigns continue apace, with tens of thousands of terrified survivors joining the more than 2.7 million already displaced. On my recent trip, I once again held broken people in my arms, and once again they told me to tell the world that if something is not done, they will all die ... not only from the violence, but also from starvation and disease. The aid workers tasked with delivering food and medicine are being targeted and killed."
Moreover, ensuring more deaths, al-Bashir has so obstructed the full deployment of the UNAMID peacekeeping mission authorized by the U.N. Security Council nearly a year ago that, as Farrow's message to the president pointed out, "only a fraction of the peace-keeping mission is deployed and little of its essential infrastructure is in place."
Most tellingly, she added that "U.N. officials have expressed fear that as things stand, the peacekeepers in Darfur will be unable to protect themselves, let alone Darfur's traumatized civilians and the humanitarian workers struggling in sustain them."
With the United States taking its turn in assuming the presidency of the U.N. Security Council this month, Farrow urges President Bush to seize this "unique opportunity to hold an open meeting -- a pledging conference" ... that "can facilitate the pairing of nations with capable armies to train, equip, sustain those African (Union) battalions in Darfur (and the wholly inadequate UNAMID forces) in need of assistance."
Farrow is very mindful of the fact that Bush was the first world leader to publicly call what she accurately describes as "the immeasurable suffering" in Darfur by its horrendous rightful name: genocide.
"Mr. President," Farrow ends her letter, "you have an opportunity to end this tragedy. The world will long remember who ended the Darfur genocide. The global community is in need of your moral leadership."
I expect Farrow is hoping that her letter will reach that deep inner voice of conscience in the president that manifested itself soon after he took office when he was reading about the deadly silence of the United Nations' then head of peacekeeping, Kofi Annan -- and President Bill Clinton -- when they had the opportunity to stop the genocide in Rwanda but averted their eyes.
In the margin of the page he was reading on those two world leaders' failure of conscience, George W. Bush wrote: "Not on my watch!"
Much has happened since to blight the legacy of Bush's presidency, but Farrow is right. And like Farrow, I believe Bush has this capacity within him not only to strengthen his legacy, but more deeply meaningful to him, to answer the renewed call of his conscience and save many thousands of lives in Darfur.
(June 18, 2008)
|
Sid wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:42 AM:
And they go no furhter themselves.
This particular scenario has only one "logical" conclusion for President Bush to do as asked by Ms. Farrow, yet she doesn't have the guts to specifically ASK for it herself because it is in conflict with her other politics no doubt.
Bush is supposed to intriduce US troops into a combat zone in Darfur. That is the only way to affect what is going on there.
But swap the word "Darfur" for "Iraq" in this discussion. Doesn't work that way for some reason now does it?
What other nations does Farrow call out to to do something? Where is her call to the UN? They are absent as Darfur is not in their interests. Why is it in ours Ms. Farrow?
And IF Bush were to introduce combat troops into Darfur, why isn't Ms. Farrow already there with an M-16 in hand to lead the way? Her passion ends at the tasking of others to do something. "