Currently
64°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Fire victims’ families awarded $29M

Grief-stricken family members of the two teens and three children killed almost one year ago in a Lemoore fire may have found a degree of solace on Tuesday, when a judgment was passed down in court to pay them $29 million in damages.

On July 28, 2007, a fire broke out in the Northgate Apartment complex on East Hazelwood Drive, starting on a low porch and ending with nine apartment units destroyed. The blaze also resulted in the deaths of recently-engaged Derik Faubion and Michell Mattison, both 19, their 2-month-old daughter Hayden Allison Faubion, as well as Mattison's two step-siblings, Lexus May Bisnar, 4, and her brother, Ariel Nel Bisnar, 2.

Meanwhile, as the building burned, firefighters had to hold back the parents and relatives of the five victims, who were forced to stand by and watch as their loved ones perished.

In November, it was announced that the relatives were filing wrongful death lawsuits against both the property owners, Santa Barbara residents Brian and Rebecca Kiniry, and the firm the owners had paid to maintain the property, Lemoore Real Estate and Property Management, Inc.

"We reached an agreement with Lemoore Property to hear the case in arbitration, to keep things efficient rather than to go through a two-week trial," said attorney David Moeck, who represented the Faubion family in the case.

Arbitration is where the proceedings are resolved by a single neutral third party, or adjudicator, whose final ruling on the matter is final and all parties involved agree to go along with. Kings County Judge Thomas DeSantos agreed in late June to let the case go forward in this direction, and appointed retired Judge Daniel Pratt to oversee the matter.

Proceedings only lasted a single day.

One critical piece of evidence in the case was a letter sent out to the Northgate Apartment tenants from the property management company, telling them that "during a six-month inspection of the units, it was noted that the smoke detectors are not in place in most units. This is a major safety issue that needs to be corrected immediately."

The defense, headed up by Hanford attorney Michael Johnson, argued that the apartment lease indicated that a smoke detector was present and that the manager even demonstrated to the victims that it worked when they moved into the complex three weeks before the fire.

However, a Kings County fire report apparently stated that a tenant living directly beneath the victims had stored a large amount of books, toys, clothing and plastic items out on the patio where the fire originally started. This kind of storage was in direct violation of the apartment complex rules, yet numerous complaints made to management there in the seven weeks since the occupant moved in did not result in any enforcement to remove them.

One investigator working with the prosecution confirmed that if these had not been out on the patio, the fire probably would never have started, and that the high levels of toxins released due to the materials being burned were a contributing factor in the deaths of the victims.

All five victims in the fire were killed by smoke inhalation and thermal burns, with high levels of carbon monoxide found in the blood, according to autopsy reports.

Fire investigators sifting through the rubble left behind in the wake of the blaze apparently found no evidence of a smoke alarm installed in the apartments that burned.

The prosecuting attorneys said that an "extraordinary" amount of time was used to gather evidence for the case, as more than 200 man hours were put into examining the scene of the fire, going over reports and gathering facts and inconsistencies to present to the court.

"I think this was the largest loss of life in Kings County -- or at least Lemoore's -- history," Moeck said. "The Faubions lost their oldest son and a grandchild. That's a powerful loss."

The final judgment ruled that Rizalda Piloquit, Arnel Bisnar and Alan Mattison would receive $21 million in damages, while Bernadette Faubion, Sue Faubion and Duncan Faubion were given $8 million.

It was found that both Lemoore Property and the owners were negligent, and that their negligence was a substantial factor in causing harm to the plaintiffs. It was also noted that all six of the relatives were caused serious emotional distress by being present at the scene and being aware of the injuries caused to their loved ones.

The land owners reportedly settled out of court for $1 million, which officials said was the limit of their insurance policy.

"This is a very sad situation, but it is the only way the judicial system recognizes a way to deal with this," attorney Mick Marderosian said, who represented Piloquit, Bisnar and Mattison in the case. "Money can never replace the loss they experienced. Yes, it sounds like an enormous amount of money, but we must remember, there were five lives lost here and their destruction was witnessed by their parents.

"I don't think there could be anything worse than that."

The reporter can be reached at 583-2425.

(July 10, 2008)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Brooke wrote on Jul 10, 2008 11:09 AM:

" I just want to say this.. before the comments and opinions get stupid.. this whole lawsuit it hurting A LOT of people.. bringing it all up again is hurting us all. Take that into consideration when you start pointing fingers and giving your two cents. There is a lot more behind this article. "

Terry wrote on Jul 10, 2008 1:44 PM:

" I still feel terrible for the families.. money cant bring them back... your all in my prayers still. "

NANCY wrote on Jul 10, 2008 2:51 PM:

" A TRAGEDY FOR THE FAMILIES. HOWEVER, WHAT YOU HEAR AND READ FROM THE NEWS AND THE NEWSPAPERS IS ONLY HALF THE STORY AND IT IS ONE-SIDED FAVORABLY ON BEHALF OF THESE FAMILIES. "

Thought wrote on Jul 10, 2008 3:08 PM:

" Terry... You're right, money can't bring them back so why in the world should the families become rich in the process? "

JUSTICE wrote on Jul 10, 2008 5:05 PM:

" TO THOUGHT: THAT WOULD BE LIKE SAYING WHY SHOULD WE PUNISH CRIMINALS WHO KILL OTHERS,ITS NOT GOING TO BRING THEM BACK. IGNORANT MENTALITY PEOPLE NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THERE ACTIONS RATHER THAN ACTING LIKE A VICTIM... IM SURE IF EVERYONE INVOLVED COULD GO BACK AND CHANGE EVERYTHING THEY WOULD IN A HEARTBEAT... NO ONE WINS IN SUCH A TRAGGIC EVENT,NO ONE... WE ALL IN LIFE GET SOMEWHAT COMPLACENT THINKING OF ALL THE POSSIBILITIES THAT COULD TAKE US OR OUR LOVED ONES IN SUCH A RAT RACE THAT WE ALL LIVE IN.... "

brittani wrote on Jul 10, 2008 5:11 PM:

" ya i agree with u brooke
you guys have no idea how this makes us
feel hearing this again there is alot more behind this article really. "

Kathy wrote on Jul 10, 2008 6:19 PM:

" The money is not about making the vicims rich, it's about punishing the negligence that brought about this tragedy. "

Lemoore resident wrote on Jul 10, 2008 6:20 PM:

" While I most certainly believe a generous amount of money should be awarded, 29 million seems quite excessive. I can only hope that this brings some help to the families and that they might choose to help others in need as well. Lemoore's people won't ever forget this sad tradgedy and our hearts go out to all those involved. "

Mike M wrote on Jul 10, 2008 9:19 PM:

" Our prays go out to all the families! This tragedy could have been avoided. My you all find peace! "

AYJAY wrote on Jul 10, 2008 9:56 PM:

" This is a tragedy and I cant imagine my family being torn apart like this. Ask yourself how much is your next family member worth in a situation like this? Exactlly there is no amount! The responsible parties should pay and keep on paying IMO! "

Feeling Sad wrote on Jul 10, 2008 10:11 PM:

" What a sad end to a sad story. I have seen this happen before: public safety officers holding back and not being a hero. I guess John Wayne is dead and he took heroism with it. I just wish more public safety officials would be less complacent, hard hearted and self centered. What a tragic loss for all the victims families. "

Stkman wrote on Jul 10, 2008 11:49 PM:

" If it's not about the money then y not send all the money to a charity for burn victums. I do fell bad for the families but it alwas comes down to blaming someone or sueing and getting the awards. I just hope this tragedy never happens again. "

This is closure wrote on Jul 11, 2008 1:05 AM:

" Hopefully this is closure for the families of the victims. Yes, money will not bring them back but hopefully they don't act "rich" and flaunt it. They will always be at a loss without thir loved ones. Hopefully they will donate most of it to their churches, the victims favorite charities or causes they supported, their schools that they attended. The homeless or senior centers.They do have a memorial garden at Lemoore High. Childrens Hospital since children were involved and if they would have survived they would have healed there. If they played sports then the local youth organizations. Organizations and school do "dedicate" in the memory of deceased persons if funds are donated. THAT would be a good use for some of that money! "

DaTrtuh wrote on Jul 11, 2008 1:54 AM:

" I dont think anyone doubts the families have suffered a great loss, BUT where is the accountability of the adult renters? Whether Im the owner or the renter, I want to make sure my family and I are protected and thus would make sure fire alarms are working correctly. If the owner wouldnt pay for a fire alarm battery then I would buy one myself... but that means being responsible for one's own action and it's something society does not feel is a necessity today. We all pay for these law suits, through our insurance premiums and tax dollars, the verdicts may be correct, but the amounts are ridiculous. I think the (adult) renters are equally at fault as the owners, and to award their families this amount of money is crazy. Negligence was demonstrated by ALL involved, not just the owners! "

To Kathy wrote on Jul 11, 2008 7:02 AM:

" Thank you Kathy, well said. "

Mrs.D wrote on Jul 11, 2008 9:58 AM:

" This apartment unit went up in the early 1980's with a tag that no one should live there because of a lack of fire alarms and extinguishers. Skip forward 27 years and the later came back to haunt the developers.

Thanks, developers, for the lack of hindsight! "

Heather wrote on Jul 11, 2008 10:51 AM:

" DATRUTH could have not said any better!!! Adults living in a residence have a responsibility to maintain there batterys on their systems. Or a responsibility to insure that a smoke detector was in place, the victims knowingly were negligent for not reporting a problem, if in fact there really was one at all. "

ex-hanfordite wrote on Jul 11, 2008 10:51 AM:

" There are plenty of lessons to be learned here and plenty of blame to go around. As a tenant you have rights and anything that is substandard needs to be fixed. If smoke detectors aren't installed in the majority of the units then that is a building code violation. If there is excessive stuff being stored in an apartment then that is a fire hazard and another code violation. If management is NON-RESPONSIVE, then get the AUTHORITIES involved. If you are afraid of getting evicted or being labelled a troublemaker don't leave your name. If the tenants in the apartment knew that there was a fire hazard and NOTHING was being done....LEARN from this. "

to feeling sad wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:33 AM:

" Where do you get off saying that public safety held back and were not hero's. From the first cops on the scene (who are not equipped to fight fire), to the firefighters who fought that fire, to the investigators who searched the rubble and recovered the bodies of the victims, each acted with bravery and courage and live each day knowing that some people just can not be saved, no matter what. As for john wayne, he was great in all the MOVIES but what department did he work for cause I never heard! "

Elizabeth wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:34 AM:

" THAT IS MUCH TOO MUCH MONEY TO HAND OUT. I AGREE WITH NANCY'S COMMENT ABOUT WHAT WE READ BEING ONE-SIDED. I ALSO AGREE WITH "JUSTICE'S" COMMENT!! AMEN-WELL SAID! TOO MANY PEOPLE IN TODAY'S SOCIETY MAKE A LIVING OUT OF TRYING TO 'RAPE' THE SYSTEM AND THOSE OF US WHO ARE TAX PAYING CITIZENS!!! WHEN WILL IT ALL END? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 11, 2008 12:04 PM:

" Fellow citizens the one thing this lawsuit probably brought about is every slum lord in kings county probably checked for working fire alarms in their rental properties because of this event. Well not everyone, but most of them did by now I am sure. How anyone can rent a piece of property and not place a couple of fire alarms in it is asking for a lawsuit, but instillation is not where it stops a consciencous landlord checks preiodically to make sure they are working correctly. Yes this could have been prevented and for a cost much lower than these lives and 29 million dollars. So whoever had control of that decision is not sleeping very well these days I would say. Rightfully so! The cost would have been minimal. "

I have walked in your shoes wrote on Jul 11, 2008 12:58 PM:

" I just want to say "I DONT THINK IT IS ANY OF OUR BUSINESS HOW MUCH OR WHAT THAT FAMILY DOES WITH THEIR MONEY", we should all pray for the family, and pray it doesnt happen to any of our loved ones. "

Lemoore resident wrote on Jul 11, 2008 1:24 PM:

" To: I have walked in your shoes...It may not be any of our business however, due to freedom of the press all of this has been made public. While I pray for the families and pray this never happens to my loved ones....I also pray they DO RIGHT by the ENORMOUS sum of money. How much does one truly need? True, it's not any of my business what they do with their money, but I for one would do something so good with money that came from something so bad. "

Hmmmmmm wrote on Jul 11, 2008 4:08 PM:

" To Mrs. D, please, there are many of us that own and live in homes that were built prior to the 80's. How hard is it to buy a smoke alarm for $9.99 and hang it up with two little screws. Replace the batteries twice a year like recommended. Don't go and try blaming it on the developer. Even if the developer had installed alarms in 1980 this is 2008 some twenty years later, they would have had to be replaced by now. This horrible senario was created by bad judgement all the way around. Who is to say the tenant didn't remove the smoke alarm. I know many that do, would rather pull them down then replace a battery. Hopefully this is a wake up call for anyone reading this story. Smoke alarms only save lives when they are used and maintained properly. "

Brooke wrote on Jul 11, 2008 4:24 PM:

" Reading all these comments sparks many different emotions for me. Michell was one of my best friends, so I knew HER. I knew the type of person she was. I, too, have said that Michell and Derik had some responsibility to check the fire alarm. BUT I also know that before this incident happened, I would have probably never thought to check the fire alarms in my own place. Call it naive. I would have to agree. We can sit here and point fingers every which way, but after all the bickering and debates, one thing still stands. Michell, Derik, Hayden, Lexus, and Ariel are gone. The hurt still remains. I really do hope Michell's family and Derik's family do something in their memory/honor with at least a part of the money. I know Michell would want to help people, so her family needs to think about that. TO 'THIS IS CLOSURE' - I know for me, this isn't closure. It brought it all back again. It hasn't even been a year since they passed. I honestly cannot see how $29 million is CLOSURE. "

Brooke wrote on Jul 11, 2008 4:26 PM:

" I'm not sure what's going to bring closure. I guess I'll know when I find it. For now, to all the people who are just reading what the media reports, there really is so much more behind the stated 'facts'. "

Amanda R wrote on Jul 11, 2008 5:53 PM:

" If there is more to the story than the stated facts, then please tell everyone what we are misunderstanding. I personally know most of the facts, the tenant below Michelle and Derik is a friend of mine. The media reports what they know and that's all they can do. This was a tragedy in our community and I know a lot of people were wondering what the final result was. Now they know: the families got what they deserved for the loss of their loved ones, although I think the amount is a bit excessive. Hopefully they will use some of it for charitable or educational purposes so that this sort of thing doesn't happen in our community again. The Sentinel has a duty to report all news, and I'm sure they're not doing it to hurt anyone or to bring up memories. "

ex-hanfordite wrote on Jul 11, 2008 5:57 PM:

" To Brooke,

We keep hearing about there being a lot more to the story.....why don't you educate us... Are you implying that the Hanford Sentinel isn't reporting the whole story? If so, then the Sentinel is doing a big disservice. What is the whole truth here and why isn't the Sentinel reporting it? "

Get a Clue wrote on Jul 11, 2008 7:23 PM:

" You're right Brooke...this is not closure it's just an end to the court process....and for those talking about the money awarded, I'd be surprised if the families got half that amount. The land owners only had 1mil in coverage and I'm sure Lemoore Real Estate had about the same...as far as who's at fault...I think all involved dropped the ball...that's why it's called a tradgedy. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 12, 2008 5:34 AM:

" Lemoore resident - you must realize not everyone uses the same yard stick in life to determine their good deeds nor their bad one's and afterall it is truly up to those individuals who received the money to decide what to do with it. The money was not earmarked for charitable orgainizations if you read the settlement arrangements. But nice try I am sure the Presbyterians appreciate you looking out for them that way. "

VLD wrote on Jul 12, 2008 1:00 PM:

" $29 million should keep the negligent parties from going back to business as usual, and it should put a scare into others who aren't doing their jobs. Where the money goes is simply no one's business. To those who feel there's "more to the story," call the reporter. The phone number is right above these comments. If it isn't BS, the Sentinel might print it.

I heard about the settlement today, and came to the Sentinel website to see the article; one of those affected is a dear friend of my family. Some of these comments are appalling. This has nothing to do with crazy juries or "raping the system" OR anyone's tax dollars!

The victims and their families have suffered more than enough without the peanut gallery chiming in. Have some decency, please. Who among you would trade places with either of these families for any amount of money? "

Joe Johnson wrote on Jul 13, 2008 9:49 AM:

" To Brooke:

I, too, would like to know what is missing from the story, considering I wrote it. Unless you are referring to the lack of comments in the story from members of the family. I suppose many journalists would have called them right up and asked, "How does this make you feel?" I just can't bring myself to do that.

Otherwise, I'm not sure what we failed to report on here. "

ex-hanfordite wrote on Jul 13, 2008 11:07 AM:

" Joe,

I for one would like to know why criminal charges were not levied against the management company and the owners, especially if they knew there were problems with the smoke alarms and fire hazard of junk being stored below.

I would like to know if the the city plans to do mandatory inspections of apartment building to make sure that they meet code.

As far as the money goes....it just sends a message. Its ghoulish to think that any of these folks are happy to be getting rich at the expense of their loved ones. Frankly, after the award gets cut, and the attorneys take their share, there isn't going to be much left over--and certainly not worth of the price of dying. "

Hmmm. wrote on Jul 13, 2008 6:24 PM:

" I hope that puts Lemoore Real Estate into bankruptcy. The fewer businesses in Lemoore to pay taxes, the faster Lemoore will get rid of that currupt mafia den of a police department the former Mayor (Buford) tried to dissolve. US Congressman Tom Tancreado of Colorado wrote a book called "In Mortal Danger" about small towns in the Southwest being infiltrated and owned by the illegal drug cartels. I can assure you, people have told me Lemoore is one of them. And for apartments not having fire alarms that are battery operated and cost so little, and admitting that in writing to tenants as a hint for them to buy one themselves or burn, was so incriminating. The award is too high, but it sends a message to other slumlords to put in fire alarms. Maybe the police department should be dissolved and the money given to a fire department that has paid employees instead of volunteers. Why should a volunteer endanger himself to fight a fire like the one that killed these children? Did they not have the right equipment or were the volunteers a little tardy in responding to the alarm? SueLemoore,too. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 13, 2008 8:55 PM:

" Joe,
The five w's in this case do not apply the Why will never be answered entriely. As for you bothering the family it is not like they hit the winning number on a lottery ticket. They lost loved one's and paid a price money cannot replace in future relationships, support and comfort.
You did the only reporting any ethical reporter could have done and that is the reason I respect you and your colleagues because unlike other sources you do not put people in awkward positions in time when healing should have began for their loss, I take my hat off to you and congratulate you on your job as a reporter for the Hanford Sentinel. I mean that sincerely, Jackie give them all a raise, including yourself. "

eastcoaster wrote on Jul 14, 2008 1:42 AM:

" You understand that just because the award was made doesn't mean that the money will be paid. Courts can find the guilty party liable for millions and if they aren't insured or don't have the assets to cover the damages awared, then there is simply a judgement applied to the guilty parties.
I feel sorry for the families but I agree with several people who stated that there was an air of responsibility on the part of the young couple. Walmart doen't charge an arm and a leg for a smoke detector and I don't know about the west coast, but on the east coast, you can go to any local fire department and they will provide you a free one WITH new batteries.
God be with the family gone and with the family left behind to suffer their loss. "

missing those lost in the tragedy wrote on Jul 14, 2008 12:47 PM:

" To DaTruth and Heather... I agree that it's the responsiblity of a renter to replace smoke alarm batteries and to make sure they are working properly. It should be pointed out that this is typically the responsiblity of most 'reputable rental companies'. I've only ever lived in one apartment complex where they didn't regularly have someone come check the smoke alarms.

However, I also must point out that you're referring to a situation where they were never installed!! This complex was noted to have such issues when it was originally built, yet the owners did nothing to fix it.

Now, a family that I know and love has lost such a set of amazing and loving children... not to mention their first great grand-child.

Please, just let's accept that the court has recognized who is a fault and allow families to grieve without pointing fingers where they don't belong. At least out of respect!!! "

Brooke wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:38 PM:

" In regards to my earlier comment about there being more facts... I guess the Sentinel wouldn't report on these types on things. They are more personal facts than anything, and out of respect to Michell, I don't find it necessary to spill it all. The people involved know what happened, and that's all that needs to be said. I wasn't trying to talk down at the reporter, nor I was trying to speak down upon the "facts" that were reported. I simply meant there is always more than to what gets told in the media. I knew this would bring a ton of opinions, which everyone is completely entitled to have, BUT in the same sense, some peoples' opinions come without knowing certain things. That's all. "

Brooke wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:47 PM:

" And, Joe, you do a great job at reporting, but you don't need MY support, nor anyone else's. You're a good reporter - you know that.

As for this situation, I'm glad you didn't approach the families. You left the story neutral, which is great. By me saying there are more facts.. there are about 4 years of certain things I can say, but like I said, out of respect for Michell, it's just not necessary. At this point, let the families and friends just grieve. Nothing more can be done in THAT aspect.

As to prevent things like this, I would REALLY like to see that money go to local apartment complexes where alarms may not be installed...this NEEDS to be prevented. Through this tradegy, we need to see PREVENTION now. "

The other Lemoore resident wrote on Jul 14, 2008 9:11 PM:

" Unless you have walked in the families shoes I don't think anyone should comment on the families recieving a judgement. It was a horrible thing that happened and my heart goes out to the families. "

STOP BLAMEING wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:08 PM:

" The problem with this community is people take 4th and 5th hand information as though it were the gospel. To all you SPECULATORS... get real!!! "

TENANT wrote on Jul 16, 2008 3:23 PM:

" all these articles are dumb. I live in these apartments and I have always had a smoke detector, and also a move in inspection when I did move in. It is ridiculous to say there are no detectors here. go ahead and knock on any our doors and see for yourselves. And they have been here and working prior to all the tragedy. "

Ashley wrote on Jul 17, 2008 1:58 PM:

" To eastcoaster: Yes out here on the west coast you can go in to any fire department and get a smoke alarm FREE. And that fact alone makes this tragedy make even less sense.

I think the award amount is outrageous, however how do you put a dollar amount of the lives of human beings? You don't. There is no amount of money that will end the grief that family and friends are feeling. There is no amount of money that will make this family whole again. Maybe there is a dollar amount that will get this property management company and property owner's attention and to that end this outrageous award may be appropriate. "

Brooke wrote on Jul 17, 2008 4:13 PM:

" TO TENANT:
If you've all had smoke detectors, why did Management send out letters 6 months before the fire saying "not all units have detectors"?? They sent this letter advising it's a major safety issue. Too bad Michell and Derik didn't live there when those letters were sent out. And if you say they inspected your apartment, I'm glad they inspected at least ONE apartment. Obviously they didn't inspect Michell's. If they did, "check fire alarm" wasn't on that list. I agree w/ Ashley. The amount of money will NEVER replace a life, but I hope it does open some eyes of property management companies and owners of property. I work in insurance and the neglect I've seen from property managers make me SICK. Get it together already. "

Rebecca Patterson-Kmet Texas Retired Pharmacist wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:33 PM:

" If more apartments allowed a small cat or dog, this tragedy could have been prevented. Cats and dogs warn owners of something unusual that is distressful to the animal. Dogs are better early warning systems than cats, but either might have saved the lives of the people in the apartment fire by waking them up. Smoke detectors can fail since a lot of people pull out the battery when a little smoke from cooking on the stove sets it off. "

Tie wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:38 PM:

" Reading people's comments really hurts me. I still don't want to believe that she is gone, everytime I see Michell mother I see is her. All i do is cry, Michell and I grew up in the same neighborhood played with each other both got in trouble together. Till this day I drive by her apt or I walk outside hoping that she would come outside... the sad thing about i was the last to find out (from what I understand) I miss her so much that I just break dwn and cry. And this hole money thing can't replace anybody...There all still with us in our hearts... I just wish that people can stop lying about how it really took place....... "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (120) Albums

    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (14) Photos
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (22) Photos
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (13) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (35) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts