Currently
45°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Locals claim water district's pumping operation is drying up wells

They stood elbow to elbow, they spilled out into the hall and they meant business.

Worried farmers and property owners inundated an office room at Hanford's Netto Ag Inc. on Wednesday, and there was one overriding reason -- dropping water well levels they blame on the Kings County Water District.

A newly-formed organization called the Kings River Area Property Owners, with Netto CEO James Netto as its chairman, hosted the meeting, which was a preliminary attempt to figure out what to do about the district operation they say is responsible.

Called the Apex Conjunctive Use Project, the district's operation is pumping water out of a recharge area near the Kings River close to Burris Park and sending it into the People's Ditch system and the Settlers Ditch system, where it is transported and sold to thirsty farmers throughout northeastern Kings County.

The operation is designed to bank water during wet years, floods and off-season flows for pumping during the summer months.

"We're saving water, getting extra water during flood releases," said Don Mills, general manager for the district.

But while the project may be benefiting some users, it's sticking in the craw of landowners closer to the river.

According to James Netto, four district pumps came on a couple of months ago to suck as much as 15,000 gallons per minute out of the ground.

Since then, he said, two residential wells and four farm wells in the area have gone dry.

"Everything was supposed to be really fine. (But) we have wells going dry," Netto said.

Netto is worried that the district is planning to increase its pumping operation.

"We don't have the first (impact) figured out yet," he said.

The packed room of farmers and private well users Wednesday provided evidence many others are also concerned.

So much so, that many signed up to give $10 per acre of land they own to the Kings River Area Property Owners to fund possible legal action against the district.

One of the most eager to sign up was Joe Elliott, who owns three acres of land on Elder Avenue that depend on wells.

Elliott said one of his wells went dry early Tuesday morning.

And he's convinced that the Apex Project is the culprit.

Brad Johns, president of Hugh Johns Inc., which farms 620 acres in the Burris Park area, went so far as to call for the firing of Mills and the replacement of all the members of the district's board of directors.

Netto said that's not what the organization is seeking.

"We want to preserve the watershed along the Kings River," Netto said.

Netto said he is concerned that the district is pumping too much water out of the area.

Netto said he's in favor of the project if it's a "win-win" for everybody, but not if it comes at the expense of Kings River Area Property owners, which he says now numbers some 60 property owners.

With possibly more on the way.

People like Mike Kuckenbaker, who owns 20 acres on Elgin Avenue near Lemoore Naval Air Station.

Kuckenbaker said he wants to "find out what's happening."

"I've got a domestic well that's only got a little bit of water in the bottom of it," he said.

Mills said in a phone interview that the district is working with the Kings River Area Property Owners to determine if the drop in their well levels is due to drought or is directly connected to pumping.

"If some of it is our fault, then we're going to address that," Mills said.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2432

(Aug. 21, 2008)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

W.O.W. wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:54 PM:

" This one is really simple. Pull out more than going in and you have a drought in the form of lowering the existing water levels.

It is everyone's problem as Mr. Netto explained. There has to be a global plan for our area otherwise were going to look like the Owens Valley.

Netto is on the right track. Action gotta be taken immediately by both sides, not us against them! "

anonymous for a reason wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:38 PM:

" It must be nice to live next to the river, which supplies many area farmers a means of less expensive water that traditional well pumping. Maybe all the rest of the area farmer's should form a group to check into how they (people living by the river) use their water. Do they have huge fountains, or oversized pools, or maybe they have elaborate landscapes that require huge amounts of water??? "

Water NOW wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:16 PM:

" I want people to remember that Kings County Water District is the only local agnecy in Kings County proactively bringing recharge water and efforts to the area. Kings County and the City of Hanford have done very little to nothing except stick more straws into the ground and suck away. Why would the object of the Kings County Water District now change to one to hurt the groundwater situation in the area.

We have just seen two dry years in succession. Pumping has been extreme and has left the overall basin in a depleted manner. I think both parties should sit down at the table and try to address the declining water levels.

I also highly recommend the City of Hanford and Kings County start addressing water supplies for our area, or we will be left to dry up. Many other communities like Tulare and Visalia have ventured into recharge programs and are continually looking at ways to import water. The City of Hanford just keeps building tanks which do no benefit to securing a supply of water. "

Joe Friday wrote on Aug 21, 2008 4:21 PM:

" The idea that you can "bank" water by taking it from an old slough channel (mussel slough?) that is natures best best system for recharge is crazy. Let me get this straight, they are sending water down Peoples Ditch to areas south of Hanford where the soil has a clay strata. When they built some of the mega dairies between Hanford and Corcoran the county claimed that these would not effect groundwater since the clay strata would not let urine and dairy runoff water get into the aquifer. So how can anyone make the claim that sending water south and using it on crops is "banking" it and recharging the groundwater supply? Sound to me like KCWD is stealing water from people near the river and getting rich selling it to landowners in the Lakeside district. "

Carl Spackler wrote on Aug 21, 2008 4:28 PM:

" Remember the old mini-series "Fresno?"

"WATER IS POWER IN FRESNO" (or anywhere else around here) "

To Joe Friday wrote on Aug 22, 2008 8:17 AM:

" Just to clarify the groundwater banking concept for you. The KCWD is using the Old Channel of the Kings River (the channel is not an active leg of the Kings River) to recharge water. When excess water is available KCWD will recharge water. Although KCWD does conduct recharge efforts throughout the area this bank district is NOT moving water south to bank in other areas. When the time arises the KCWD will pump water from the groundwater system and deliver it to farmers in the area. KCWD only has access to a portion of the water that is recharged. A percentage (I do not know the number) is left behind so that the overall groundwater level is left in a positive balance. With that being said I could probably make the case that increased pumping by entities surrounding the area have depleted the groundwater. I think we all have to remember we have come off of two very dry years and we have been using our wells heavily. The KCWD is one of the only entities in the area proactively manageing water for the area. "

Joe Friday wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:41 AM:

" To Joe Friday wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:17 AM

"I think we all have to remember we have come off of two very dry years and we have been using our wells heavily. The KCWD is one of the only entities in the area proactively manageing water for the area. "

Yes I would agree that wells have been used heavily the last few years. In fact they have been used so much, that the pumping being done by three wells near Burris Park utilized by KCWD to send water south have reduced outflows. This necessitating the drilling of two new wells near Burris Park to keep the water heading south at the same rate. The real questions here are:

1; Why did KCWD feel the need to drill two new wells If they were properly managing existing groundwater supplies?
2; Who is the direct recipient of the water pumped from near Burris Park and sent south?
3; Is the water from these wells being used to replace water already sold to someone else?
4: If so, who benefited financially from this sale? "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (120) Albums

    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (14) Photos
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (22) Photos
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (13) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (35) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts