Currently
48°
Showers

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Kings County wants regional re-entry prison

Convicts nearing the end of their terms and getting ready to re-enter civilian life in Kings, Fresno and Madera counties might soon find themselves in a single regional rehabilitation prison -- in Kings County. The site remains undetermined. So far, it's a toss-up between Corcoran and Hanford, although officials say Hanford is more likely to get it. "The state wants to keep the re-entry facility in Hanford because it's meant to be a regional facility and Hanford is less distant from other areas," said Rebecca Campbell, county management analyst. "We have to work with cities and the state to make sure we have a viable site. Corcoran is still a possibility, but it may not be the first site we choose."

With a handful of potential sites in their hands, county officials are on the fast track to winnow down the most viable locations for a 500-bed facility. Last week, state officials descended from Sacramento to inspect some of the potential sites the county had identified.

County officials have until mid-September to submit three potential locations to the state, which will later select a final location.

Potential sites include 20-plus acres on the east and west sides of Koinonia Church on Hanford-Armona Road, 10 to 15 acres on 10-1/2 Avenue south of County Community School, 13 acres at the corner of Highway 43 and Lacey Boulevard next to the SPCA. The Corcoran site is within prison property.

Although concerns aren't widespread, reactions are mixed among local officials as well as residents. Hanford and Corcoran are cooperating with the county, but Lemoore declined to do so. There are also not-in-my-backyard arguments springing up from some neighbors in Armona as well.




Strings attached

Kings County wants to house one of California's first so-called "re-entry" facilities intended to help inmates who want to go straight before going back into society.

In exchange, the county will get $30 million in funding to expand its overcrowded jail. Officials also say it could be an economic boon to the area.

The concept of these re-entry facilities is to give inmates who are serving the final year of their sentence and demonstrate the desire to leave a life of crime, the job training and substance abuse treatment they need to succeed before they are released.

"Right now, when a guy gets released to go on parole, they are given $200, a bus ticket and get sent out," Supervisor Jon Rachford said, making a point that inmates are currently released back to their communities whether or not they are rehabilitated. "This will reduce the recidivism rate, reduce our exposure to crimes committed by parolees and lower the jail population."

California has the nation's worst re-offense rate with nearly two-thirds of offenders returning to prison within three years, according to a 2005 study by UC Irvine. The re-entry facility is the state's latest attempt to fix the problem. According to state statistics, a total of 518 inmates from Kings County are eligible to be released on parole.

For Kings County, the re-entry facility means money as well.

Officials say it's a one-time funding opportunity -- possibly the only chance in the foreseeable future -- to expand its jail.

"Clearly this was set up as an incentive for the county to assist the state with locating a re-entry facility, which on its face has a merit anyway," said Larry Spikes, county administrative officer. "But if you throw in $30 million, which we competed for and successfully got, that's something that really makes it worthwhile in our estimation."

The county has twice proposed a half-cent sales tax increase, but it failed both times. The county managed to build the first phase of the new jail, but capacity remains inadequate.

Because of jail overcrowding, those incarcerated in Kings County serve 51 percent of their sentences on average, Campbell said.

The $30 million funding would add 170 beds to the existing 361 beds.

"This is the only game in town in the foreseeable future to get the next phase of the jail built," Spikes said.

AB900

In April 2007, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB900, a prison reform bill that calls for building 40,000 new prison beds including 16,000 beds in so-called "re-entry" facilities, generally smaller, community-based prisons with an emphasis on rehabilitating inmates so they have a better chance of making it in the outside world.

The bill also calls for 13,000 new beds in local jails, raising hopes for counties like Kings, whose year-old jail is too small to hold most of those sentenced to serve time there.

Kings County was one of three smaller counties awarded their full requested amount. Ten similarly sized counties were vying for the money. Officials say the county's willingness to secure a location for a regional re-entry facility gave it priority consideration.

County officials say the facility would bring 300-plus state jobs, and be an economic boon for the county.

Reactions

Two of the potential re-entry facility sites sandwich Koinonia Christian Fellowship Church on Hanford-Armona Road and 13th Avenue.

Church leadership sees it as a positive.

"We have thought about it. Obviously, the decision hasn't been made yet," said Andrew Cromwell, Koinonia's executive pastor. "We see it as a potential for us being able to further service our community. If they come in, we would embrace them."

Cromwell acknowledges some church members do have some concerns.

"Not everyone feels very excited about the idea, because there's lack of clarity and lack of information," Cromwell said.

The church has a plan to build a preschool on the site. The re-entry facility won't be an issue as long as it remains a lock-down facility, Cromwell said.

County officials, too, assure it is a secure facility.

But Teresa Gonzales, a nearby resident and a Koinonia member, is still worried -- even after hearing facts about the re-entry facility.

"I'm concerned they're going to put it near my home," Gonzales said. "They are making it sound like it's not a big deal, but it is for us."

The state says the program has proven to work in other states. Gonzales remains skeptical.

"The concept of it sounds great, but in reality I think a very small percentage of people actually change," Gonzales said. "I'm just afraid of the problem it's going to create for us and our children. I'm afraid their families would move to the area and these inmates would settle down here when they do get out."

County officials say that's not the case.

By law, parolees are sent back where they lived last, officials say. And Fresno and Madera being so close to Kings County, they believe there's little motivation for the families of the inmates to move to the area.

Gonzales' sister, Elena Anzoleaga, has also been vocal about her concern.

"I'm not against people getting help," Anzoleaga said. "I just don't understand why it has to be so close to where people live when there's plenty of county space here."

Local jurisdictions' reactions have been mixed as well.

City councils and Hanford and Corcoran have welcomed the potential siting of a re-entry facility in their communities with open arms, but the Lemoore City Council has turned it down.

Mary Hornsby, who was among the council members who opposed the facility coming to Lemoore, said it was the locations that raised concerns, not the concept itself.

"As far as Lemoore was concerned, I had issues with the locations they had pre-selected," Hornsby said.

One of the locations Kings County was looking at was near West Hills College and the other on Houston Avenue near a potential site the school district was looking at for a future elementary school, Hornsby said.

"I just didn't feel placing it near an elementary school would be ideal," Hornsby said.

Hanford city officials see the re-entry facility in the community as positive.

Councilman Dan Chin said he supports the fact Kings County is receiving $30 million to expand its jail and brings high-paying state jobs to the area through the re-entry facility.

Councilwoman Marcie Buford supported the philosophy behind the re-entry facility.

"We're not adding population to our area. If there's a way for these inmates to get job skills, there's a good likelihood that they'd be productive citizens. It makes a lot of sense not just for their life, but also for the economy."

While the state wants some political coverage through local jurisdictions' blessings, it has the ultimate say in the choice of location.

The state has rejected sites in Avenal and Corcoran as unsuitable because of a Valley fever epidemic in those areas. But it has since lifted the restriction on the Corcoran site after the county asked for reconsideration.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2429.

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Adrian wrote on Aug 23, 2008 8:01 AM:

" So, one option is for inmates from Kings County to parole straight back and arrive by car, or at the bus or train station with $200 bucks. The other option is they would be transferred back to Kings County for a few months of Rehab and job training and then parole. The county gets 30 million and 300 jobs if they show up early and nothing if they don't. Oh and local workers would likely get the money for building, servicing and maintaining the place.

They have to come back to the county anyway, might as well get paid to recieve, train and rehab them. "

A thought wrote on Aug 23, 2008 8:33 AM:

" Put them as far away as Kettleman City, they then could eat at in and out everyday and meet many people who travel. "

Ryan wrote on Aug 23, 2008 10:00 AM:

" That's all we need is more drug addicts and wanna-be gangster parolee's in Kings county.... "

WATCHDOG FRED JUST WHAT WE NEED wrote on Aug 23, 2008 10:23 AM:

" Just what we need, pick up the Hanford Sentinel or Fresno Bee or turn on the news and listen to the gang violence perpetrated in these cities. Do you want that element even visiting Hanford? "

Concerned Mother wrote on Aug 23, 2008 1:22 PM:

" Valley fever - give me a break! What about the children they will come in contact with? Will our children be safe? "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 23, 2008 2:57 PM:

" At a time when it is dog eat dog to find decent paying jobs in Kings County your Council members are making the following comments:

Councilman Dan Chin said he supports the fact Kings County is receiving $30 million to expand its jail and brings high-paying state jobs to the area through the re-entry facility.

Councilwoman Marcie Buford supported the philosophy behind the re-entry facility.

Let's build one of these right next door to Marcie or Dan and see how it benefits them or the community. I think you would hear them sing an entirely different chorus to this tune. "

Corcoran wrote on Aug 23, 2008 3:43 PM:

" Please, put it in Corcoran. "

unnonimouse wrote on Aug 23, 2008 4:23 PM:

" I hope they don't open it in Corcoran because it is not like they hire Corcoran people to work there anyways. They always hire out of town people. "

SAM BLACKWOOD wrote on Aug 23, 2008 5:11 PM:

" This town is well over due for such a facility. Lets be flexable on the location, no matter where they want to locate. "

Options wrote on Aug 23, 2008 5:11 PM:

" Ah, how about that Ethanol plant instead? We wouldn't be facing this if the plant had been approved by the SPCA. I'll take that before this facility. "

ppg wrote on Aug 23, 2008 6:13 PM:

" The facility should not be built near a church that is planning to have a pre-school. I don't care how much a church wants to be and do everything to help society. The people in this re-entry facility could be potential child abusers. There is always the "what if factor". What if someone escapes and hides out on church property? Our children are more important that those parolees.

Rules change too. What if the facility changes it policy from a lock-down facility. "What if"

This new facility needs to be built away from homes, churches or schools. The SPCA area seems to be a better location.

All of you out there that are close to this situation should get up in arms and attend council meetings and voice your opinions clearly, deliberately and respectfully. Remember: "What if" "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 23, 2008 10:55 PM:

" 13 acres at the corner of Highway 43 and Lacey Boulevard next to the SPCA. Folks, you already know I am not for one of these sites being located here. But if it comes down to the above location or next door to a Church's School then I vote the Hwy 43 location. Why would anyone even consider such an irresponsible move as to locate rapists, murderers and drug dealers adjacent to a school. Murderers get 25 to life and many are parolled early and they will be some of the clientel at this re-entry facility. Doubt it, ask Sheriff Jordan for a guarantee these kinds of inmates won't be in the facility and see what his response is. Can he make us a guarantee a murder or rapist won't be assigned to this facility at any time in the future or during it's useage within our county. I bet he cannot do that and will not do that, if he is a man of integrity. "

DL wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:01 AM:

" It is easy to be against everything. However, these are the choices and decisions that responsible people have to make. If you can come up with a REAL WORLD solution to the problem of paying for expanding the jail and reducing the recidivism of parolees at the same time then by all means lets hear your ideas. "

Valley Girl wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:06 AM:

" I'm all for the re-entry facility. Sure there are cons to it just like anything else but the pros, I believe, out weigh them. Being built near a church, school or home has to be absolutely not up for consideration. "

taxpayer wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:13 AM:

" Why not use the scrub land out on Kansas Ave, away from town, children and elderly.
Just a thought. "

Carl Spackler wrote on Aug 24, 2008 10:11 AM:

" Fred: I agree with your opinion on the Hwy 43/198 location. However, there are no city utilties in that area and supposedly no capacity for something that large without a new sewer truck line. I don't see how it can go there. "

Lives in El Rancho wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:08 AM:

" I am not saying I am for or aginst the Re-entry facility, but unlike many, it seems, I am at least willing to listen to both sides of the argument. As for ppg's comment about "This new facility needs to be built away from homes, churches or schools. The SPCA area seems to be a better location." - you obviously don't come out to the Flea Market, or our side of town often, where there are 2 subdivisions within a mile of the SPCA. I guess we don't count as "homes" in your view. "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:49 AM:

" DL wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:01 AM:
Avenal - was rejected because of spores yet we have a prison there. I say build three such sites adjacent to the Corcoran, Avenal and Coalinga poperties. I'm sure the state of California already has ownership of sufficient land there. These could be outside the prison confines but close enough that if a problem arose there would be sufficient C.O.'s to respond and take care of the problem, in addition to the C.O.'s already there. They could provide evereything in those locations they could hope to accomodate in Hanford and even more. Could they then also utilize the professionals at both the prison and the reentry facility to provide services to all inmates? Why spend the extra money duplicating services? Many prisoners have even been paroled to prison property surrounding the prisons when released, this is nothing new. Is there anything in the requirements that says the reentry cannot be placed adjacent to the prison/jail for that matter. There are other solutions that people are not even looking at, in the locations of these sites. "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:54 AM:

" To: Carl Spackler wrote on Aug 24, 2008 12:11 PM:
Perhaps the first job of the Prisoners could be to dig a few say ten or so Septic Tanks by hand. Septic tanks worked in this area for years, don't know why they wouldn't work for a mini prison?
As they fill up pump them out and get rid of the waste. Isn't Simon's still in business? Dig a well for water, electric is already in, what more could you possibly need? Let the state purchase it's electric from PG&E like the rest of the folks in that area. They put a truck stop in.

" Fred: I agree with your opinion on the Hwy 43/198 location. However, there are no city utilties in that area and supposedly no capacity for something that large without a new sewer truck line. I don't see how it can go there. " "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 24, 2008 12:02 PM:

" Lives in El Rancho wrote on Aug 24, 2008 1:08 PM:

Perhaps you didn't read the entire article. The other location is only feet away from a proposed school. El Rancho is several yards away from the SPCA if not a couple of miles. Besides maybe you can get a job out there? If you are so open minded about it.

That is what the city doesn't understand the State has the employees for these facilities all lined up. The C.O.'s are part of a union these jobs are going to be put out for bid by union members. That excludes any local hiring. The C.O.'s have been wanting safer duty for years, they will jump on this arrangement, just to get out of places like Corcoran. So so much for local jobs!!!!!

Yeah you can probably get a job with the state watching people like Charlie Manson when this goes in, cause those C.O.'s have sense enough to want to leave.

Of course certain businesses, like the hospital and other service oriented businesses want this, it will be guaranteed profits for years to come. "

ALEJANDRO wrote on Aug 24, 2008 4:42 PM:

" Hey, just remember folks,

The county wants to build that new criminal reentry facility really close to us.

You would have to be crazy to have 500 or so criminals being released into our community no matter how much vocational training they receive.

Why not build it in the Tulare - Visalia corridor near to the COS campus so they could get a degree or become a nurse or a pharmacy technician?

Wait . . . isn't that one possible reason for the COS bond and building initiative here in Hanford/Kings County?

Why put the exiting criminals near nice Visalia anyway?

Oh, that's right, all the people of Hanford and Kings County really want it here for the jobs . . .

Isn't that special, Carl? "

Carl Spackler wrote on Aug 24, 2008 6:40 PM:

" Alejandro: You understand that the state inmates will still be released here if their family is here, whether there is a re-entry facility or not, corrrect? "

Bobb wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:13 PM:

" Now here is an opportunity for all of that land Peterson wants to develop near the Lemoore Naval Air Station. What a great place to put a facility like this. The persons incarcerated there will not be there permanently as someone who buys a house under the flight path and they will have an incentive to get out and leave the area. "

Devils Advocate wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:46 PM:

" Two reasons to oppose the facility:
1) It serves a broader region than just Kings County. Families of inmates orignally from Fresno will be detained for up to a year at the facility according to the plan - which means the gangbangers closest realtives can and will relocate to be close for visiting, just as they do for regular lockup (I love the post about people from Corcoran not being hired at Corcoran prison - I wonder why that might be?) Yes, I'm suggesting the families of gangbangers are just as big a threat (if not bigger) to Kings County as the ones dumb enough to get caught.
2) We will have absolutely no control over what the State chooses to do with the facility in the future. It could be expanded, it could become a NON-re-entry facility, it could become something even more porous - with inmates able to come and go more freely. Once approved, the County and its residents will have virtually no say in its evolution.
Both are high prices to pay for a jail expansion. I'd rather re-vote on a jail bond, now that we know the ugly alternative. "

WATCHDOG FRED ARE YOU SERIAL wrote on Aug 24, 2008 10:11 PM:

" "California has the nation's worst re-offense rate with nearly two-thirds of offenders returning to prison within three years", Worst re-offense rate and they are gonna be right here, by our children, our wives and our senior citizens.

"By law, parolees are sent back where they lived last, officials say. And Fresno and Madera being so close to Kings County, they believe there's little motivation for the families of the inmates to move to the area." That's what they said about the Manson Family when they moved him to Corcoran, but guess what they showed up.

County officials say the facility would bring 300-plus state jobs, and be an economic boon for the county. Yeah and the State will bring all those workers here from within it's own Prison System. Not hire locals for the jobs.

I hope the citizens aren't buying this half-hearted sell job. We get 30 million dollars, so build it next to the jail over by 12th Avenue at Park Place and Boardwalk. It's good enough for a Super~Wal~mart, Target and Lowe's oh and Home Depot too! Everyone does realize Wal~mart owns Home Depot do they not? "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 25, 2008 7:44 AM:

" To: Alejandro - the only flaw with all of this planning for more higher paying jobs in Hanford. Is it won't be local unemployed people gaining access to those jobs. As I've state previously the C.O.'s have a union those jobs for the re-entry center like any other in the corrections department. Will have to be put up for bid and seniority will determine who gets them. A new hire won't stand a chance as many C.O.'s want an opportunity with the high price of gasoline to get out of Corcoran and Avenal State Prisons. They are the one's who will get those jobs, just like all the professional jobs that go along with it. Again people already employed by the State in other cities and counties will also get those jobs.
So people like Carl, will benefit because of the service industry he is in, but very few other citizens will benefit. If you aren't in medical or poychological areas of expertise you won't fit the criteria for what they are looking for in local employment. Yeah some trades will work for six or so months building it. Then What? "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 25, 2008 8:00 AM:

" To: Alejandro - as far as maintenance goes Avenal and Corcoran have their own experienced trades workers on staff already. They have plumbers, electricians and HVAC people on payroll. So I doubt local tradesmen will benefit from this reentry center.

I will concede there might be a flash in the pan influx of employment during the building process. They might need some $8 an hour laborers. Then we will be stuck with an eyesore of embarassment twenty or thirty years down the road. Prime example the old King's County Jail. Speaking of which why couldn't they refurbish that and make it a re-entry facility? No one thought of that yet, or does it contain 500 beds?

I think the entire thing is a plan to get 30Million from the state and the state gets something built not many other communities want within their city limits. Perhaps the good sheriff should have investigated this request for a funding grant just a little more closely than he evidentlly did?

This event and this event alone has convinced me the Deputy Sheriffs who have complained are right. "

Wait and See wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:48 AM:

" Kings County will get the $30 million. Construction will begin late, cost more than estimated. Next step- new levy, bond measure, etc so that local taxpayers will have to foot the bill for something that they don't want in this County.

So who really benefits? The Police-Sheriff coalition that are building their kingdoms and adding to their payroll. The more people you have working for you, the more you make. The rank and file get 10%, so does the Chief plus all his Lieutenants.

The larger theDeptartment in a governement, the more power, the more power games, the less answerable they are to actually provide a service to the people who pay their salaries.

So go ahead- let us all sit here and just watch. When the cons get out of jail, they won't get a bus ticket, because they will STAY here in Kings County. So will their girl/boyfriends, the children with all different last names. Then they take the Section 8 Housing from the Seniors and the Disabled.

It is a vicious circle.

Let this facility go somewhere else. It is not a positive addition to the quality of life. "

WATCHDOG FRED THIS IS MY POINT EXACTLY wrote on Aug 25, 2008 2:25 PM:

" This is why Kings County shouldn't want re-entry facilities: This guy had two months to paroll.

Inmate escapes from state prison in San Diego

SAN DIEGO - A minimum security inmate has escaped from a state prison in San Diego.

Prison spokesman Lt. Michael Stout says 24-year-old Manuel Casillas escaped from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility between 6 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. Sunday.

Stout says the prison staff searched the grounds and the surrounding area and did not find Casillas.

Casillas was serving time for second degree burglary. He had been in the prison for about two years and is scheduled to be paroled in two months.

Prison officials have asked the Highway Patrol, the Border Patrol and the public for help in locating Casillas. "

Prayer Warrior wrote on Aug 25, 2008 4:35 PM:

" Wow, what has our community come to? A facility such as this in Kings County would be like opening a Pandora's box. If allowed, it will eventually get out of control and not just with the gangbangers' families coming in and out and establishing residences here. Yes the world will change no matter what, but why invite more unwanted situations for our community; more importantly...our children. Kings County, it is time to come together as "Prayer Warriors" and fight for our community! All this for jail expansion? Please re-think this Kings County!!! "

WATCHDOG FRED i DONT REMEMBER GETTIN TO VOTE DO YOU wrote on Aug 25, 2008 5:24 PM:

" To: Eiji, normally I wouldn't correct you but I think a more correct title would be: KINGS COUNTY GOERNMENT WANTS REGIONAL AND RE-ENTRY FACILITY. "

ALEJANDRO wrote on Aug 25, 2008 6:10 PM:

" I posted this over on the other column but is bears repeating here:

The county wants it now built on Lacey and Hwy 43 - Welcome to Hanford!

What? Hwy. 43 and Lacey???

That is the least developed and blighted area in the City.

Oh, I get it . . . the released criminals need only take a short walk west on Lacey to feel at home once again.

Great way to go, Spikes et al.

I would agree to the location that was depicted in the Sentinel a few days ago: right on the campus and grounds of Corcoran Prison.

Safe and sound area down there with a good track record for community safety.

And do we really want a huge prison welcoming drivers into the area from the 99-198 corridor?

Isn't anyone thinking about this rationally?

C'mon Citizens: SPEAK UP! "

Proud Dad wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:18 PM:

" 43 and Lacey wouldn't be a good spot, since the 8700 block of Lacey is already a hot spot for sex offenders. We are seeing headlines on a continuous basis in regards to gang problems and have a police force that is thin enough already. We do not need any more additional headaches to deal with around here. They need to go to areas that have more jobs that are willing to hire ex-felons. "

To Alejandro wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:18 PM:

" I agree with what you are saying. Unfortunately we have politicians and government employees in control, who do not see a responsibility to listen to how the people of the County feel or what the people want, or what we want our quality of life to be.

On the Board of Supervisors, the same.

From everything that I have read, if the voters of Kings County marched on the City Council and Board of Supervisors meetings, it would do no good. Same with the Planning Commision.

Read the Sentinel, -one has the impression, "Who in their right mind would okay this?" Yet it happens time and again. "

give me a break wrote on Aug 25, 2008 9:46 PM:

" Rehabilitation???? what a joke! You can build all the warm and fuzzy "re-entry" facilities you want, but these criminals will most likely never be rehabilitated no matter what you do. Not as long as there are gangbangers walking out on a prison yard and saying "I finally made it", yes, you read it right. It's like a rite of passage for some of these guys to go to prison. There's no rehab for that. "

Angie wrote on Aug 26, 2008 12:45 PM:

" To 'Give me a break'
C'mon now, how can you say these guys will never be rehabilitated? Some do serve their time and move on to live productive lives. Let's give some of these guys a little hope. As for the re-entry facility, it should be somewhere near a prison or out in the middle of nowhere and it should never be an option for rapists and child molesters. "

Sheriff Jordans Neighbor wrote on Aug 26, 2008 12:48 PM:

" No No NO...Lacey and 43? come on now, Hey Sheriff Jordan do we really need this on OUR back yard? Lacey and 43 is already a hot spot for sex offenders, Homeless people, and Gang Bangers. And thats not counting the Dope Dealers on the cornor.. "

What the wrote on Aug 26, 2008 1:31 PM:

" Does anyone go to the information meetings or ask the powers to be before they all make snap decisions? These inmates will be coming back to Kings County. If they live in Kings County and were arrested in Kings County they will be paroled back to Kings County. Will all inmates be rehabilitated? No. Of course not. To believe that families of all inmates are no loads is not fair. I know many good families that have family in prison and jail. Understand that right now in the center of Hanford is the county jail. This does not just house the non violent criminal. They house the violent criminal that is awaiting trial. They have gang members inside of our county jail awaiting trial and turn over to a state facility. There has not been an escapee from the new jail.
This new facility will be a secure facility. NO in and out priviledges. It will be run by the state not the local government.

Do your homework before making snap decisions. "

Carl Spackler wrote on Aug 26, 2008 9:48 PM:

" Lacey & 43 is the perfect location for this facility. It has great freeway access. It has next to no houses and no schools. It is primarily open land with a little industrial/commercial development. The only downside is no utilties. Otherwise it is a great selection. "

Paul wrote on Aug 26, 2008 10:09 PM:

" No matter what some of you say, your neighbor maybe the person that will be filling out an application for a job there. And all these half baked ideas that only those already working for the system will get the jobs in funny. Who will replace the people that come here? Ever thought of that? I know people that work at the facility in Corcoran that are from Hanford. To think that ALL of these CO"S are a wandering band of gypsies that go from city to city in search of what (?) is at best asinine. And the reason that the majority of people want this facility is that maybe SOME people want a shot at a GOOD JOB and the opportunities that come with it.
To think that there is going to be disorder and killings and calamity in the streets of Hanford because of this facility shows the small town mentality of some here. The one thing about the world is that change WILL come and small towns like Hanford are courting these facilities because of the money involved. Farmers are selling out and cotton just doesn't cut it anymore. "

Bart T. wrote on Aug 26, 2008 10:26 PM:

" To WDF - in your words, "If you aren't in medical or poychological areas of expertise you won't fit the criteria for what they are looking for in local employment."
So, if I went to school to work in any of those fields, I'm supposed to feel sorry for people like you who probably didn't? I'll think of that on my way to the bank on payday and chuckling that your area of expertise isn't spelling. That is the real reason why people don't get hired. The word is "psychological." "

Parkside Resident wrote on Aug 26, 2008 11:16 PM:

" I live a block away from Koinania Church and I refuse to let a facility of this sort to move in my neighborhood. There is also a apartment building full a kids right down the way. Also the bus stop is right off on Hanford- Armona Road. Lets think of the safty of our kids. If this is going to come to Hanford then I would like to see it go to the country instead of town full of kids. If anyone knows when the next meeting will be held please let me know and my husband and I along with all my opposed neighbors will be there to argue this and see this does not happen!!!!! "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 27, 2008 2:24 PM:

" Paul wrote on Aug 27, 2008 12:09 AM:

" No matter what some of you say, your neighbor maybe the person that will be filling out an application for a job there.

You asked a question, I feel I should answer it. The one's who also will be taking those jobs from your neighbors are people like my great nephew who just returned and got out of the army. He will have a 10-15% advantage on any government job application he fills out over you on both the written as well as the oral exam. Blue Falcon is entitled to the same benefit. The thing is you don't understand how many of them are returning and have returned already and they will be shoved to the head of the line as they should be. So Paul I don't want to discourage you from applying just don't be surprised if a returning Veteran gets the position, as they should. They have made sacrifices alot of people here bloggin never have and never will make. So why shouldn't they get something extra out of it?
After all it's the law!!!!!!!!!! "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 27, 2008 2:33 PM:

" I still feel the ideal location would be on property adjacent to the Corcoran Prison, room for growth in either direction. The one's opposing this hope to work there so naturally they are pushing for Hanford with the price of gasoline. I understand the concept, convenience.
Corcoran has a trained staff of Correctional Officers who deal with prisoners in a Maximum Prison on a daily basis, they already have their swat teams ready to take the baddest of the baddest down. As for services they already have the medical and psychological staff on hand to deal with the problems there and Hanford Community cares for prisoners on a daily basis. There minor medical could be handled by simply transporting them from their re-entry facility back to the regular prison compound. Not a 45 minute drive away from the Prison and Re-entry Facility. It is a win win situation, you could build as many as you want and have a confined space to secure them in wihtout fear of reprisal.
I don't care who you are get 500 inmates rioting in any lockup you got your hands full, I don't care where it is located. "

sus wrote on Aug 27, 2008 2:37 PM:

" Put it in Fresno hello they already have a bunch of crap there..or better yet i agree with Kettlemen City..ha..farther away the better..we need to start cleaning up our city..this is a nice place to live and we need to keep it that way ..we need to get involved to keep out the gangs..if you see someone who looks like a gang member call the cops you dont have to give your name..tell them they look like they are staking out your neighborhood..we need to get this city under control for our childrens sake. "

WATCHDOG FRED wrote on Aug 27, 2008 2:41 PM:

" Paul wrote on Aug 27, 2008 12:09 AM:

Do you ever read other people's blogs, did you not read the one where I pasted the article in the Hanford Sentinel that stated a prisoner with only two months left on his sentence escaped? He would have been on parole in two months, what sense did it make for him to escape. Can you give us your personal guarantee that no prisoner in this re-entry facility will ever escape? I don't believe you or the Sheriff can ensure that to any of us. I thought of another location, besides Corcoran, build it right next to and as part of the King's County Jail Expansion. Better yet buy the Walmart property, tear it down and build the re-entry facility right there. Then the rest of the businesses will move out and the city will have access to all the property for expansions on re-entry facilities. We can build our malls on one side and our mini-prisons on the otherside until we can get a full fldged big Maximum Security Prison, of our very own. In the name of progress and new jobs. "

What the wrote on Aug 27, 2008 4:13 PM:

" The reentry facility that might or might not be housed in Kings County will have parolees from Kings and Fresno County NOT Madera County. The reentry facility in Madera County will have parolees from Madera and Fresno County NOT Kings County.

It will be a secured facility. Again,there will be no in and out priviledges.

The state will make the final determination of where they want the facility to be. The county can make recommendations but in the end it will be the state who will decide which piece of property they will buy and if the property will be sufficient for their needs.

It is amazing at the information meeting that there weren't more people in front of the board protesting. The only school that came out was Kit Carson.

People only complain when it is in their backyard.

If it isn't in your backyard it does seem to bother you.

This is in my backyard and I don't have a problem with it. I have more of a problem with the motels on East Lacey. "

GREAT LOCATION wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:46 PM:

" Put it by the TACHI INDIAN CASINO, Just across the street. "

Devils Advocate wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:01 AM:

" Dear "What the", you may be making an erroneous assumption about the commentors level of involvement. Personally, I went to a few City Council meetings where the facility was spoken of, and I've worked in government long enough to know that the State may woo us with jail money now, but in the end it WILL hold all the cards. Once its built, they can do ANYTHING they want with it. Kings and half of Fresno NOW could easily turn into overflow from from ANY institution or any locality. There is nothing about the word "re-entry" that guarantees a function, or ties the hands of legislators from outside the Valley. Our State government can't tie its own shoes without first telling us 10 lies first. Truth is, they want to decentralized our prisons, which some view as convenient for transportation budgets. Me, I like my corrections served up Alcatraz-style, with a Black Hole of Calcutta on the side. If you want that dog in your back yard, fine. But eventually the mongrel's litter mates will come sniffing around my back yard, and I have a real problem with that. "

El Ranch Resident wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:28 AM:

" All for the money. If you live in this area shame on you for not wanting to protect us from the re-entry facility. Apparently you dont value you property or your family. Lock down, dont let that comment fool you. What about escapes?? Drug_ Trafficing? Yeah,, let them hide out in your home because they are not coming to mine. I think it is a wonderful idea to rehab these criminals. I Work my behind off to have the little I do have and I would like to keep it. I dont like anything about this. This idea was shut down in numerous other locations and it will be again in this one. Kit Carson parents lets rally and run this idea out of our district. Our supervisor should of represented us, but, apparently she forgot to ask the people that voted her in office in the first place. Not a very good idea Mrs. Taylor especially when you are in the middle of an election year!!! "

what the wrote on Aug 28, 2008 11:06 AM:

" Fine. Let's not put the reentry facility here. Let the parolees come back and live on east lacey blvd. Let the kids get picked up by the bus. Let them see what is going on.

Because let's all remember that the only place the bad guys their families live are in LA and the prison towns.

There is no prison near San Jose or the general area and they have gangs, they have crime. But oh who do we blame that on. Probably on law enforcement because they aren't there when we need them. Maybe we should blame the schools because they aren't teaching our children right from wrong. But when our children are wrong we should fight with the school because we as parents can say our children are wrong but you at the school can't.

Who do we blame for ignorance?

When do we stand up and take responsibility for our actions? When are we held accountable. We all can judge each other but until you walk a month in my shoes don't bother to judge me. "

MICHELLE wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:55 PM:

" Re-entry???I have lived in the El Rancho subdivision for 40 years and have seen all the re-entry hopefuls I care to see. I have a motel directly behind my home which was made an interim housing for parolees (without notification from the county). I also saw a pedophile stalk my 4 year old grandchild from the top floor of that motel with other parolees watching. Fortunately I was also watching and he promptly went back to prison. I see no reason for any facility like this to be near a residential area or a school. Although 43 might be convenient, it is not the only highway in Kings County and certainly not the most desolate. We deserve to keep our property values and above all the safety of our children. What would the necessity be for a facility of this sort to be near three residential areas and a rural school where our children are picked up standing at bus stops? The only people for this won't have to live next to the site. No thanks!! "

The aim of Kings county is to become a police county wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:10 AM:

" This city and its official have a lucrative plan to increase the county population with as many socially ill-equipped loser as possible.

Their is little social rehab that can be bestowed upon such a large number of prison-minded/lost individuals.Concentration in small towns like this and they start to increase and procreate into larger unproductive pains-in-the-a**.What is Kings County thinking?

Is city council busy creating a a small-town, i.e., mini East L.A., mini Watts, a mini downtown Altlanta, or perhaps a mini inner-city Houston type of atmosphere for the future of Hanford?In this small town there will be no-way one can escape the sepecter of gang members and the scope of violence they bring with them.

Anyone with a right mind know that "gang/criminals elements"' thrive in communities that are highly social welfare supported, statistic prove that and pychcologically the gang members are ruled more by emotions, more prone to revenge killings.Do we really need to incorporate more of that type a unproductive males into this area?

I know why Kings county wants to bring the facility in...so they want to keep the local farmworker in touch the children they unsuccessfully raised. WHY? "

district wrote on Aug 29, 2008 5:11 PM:

" Great News, the citizens who live in district five got the notification letters today in the mail regarding the proposal of this facility. Isn"t that nice. Thanks for thinking about us Mrs. Taylor. She has let doem alot of us, we really expected her to represent her area and she failed to even notify us in a timely manner "

County under city influence wrote on Aug 29, 2008 7:10 PM:

" That area of Lacey Blvd. is in the county but if you build out there you have to pay impact fees to the City of Hanford. What weigh-in does the council have on this area if it is city influence? I'd call and oppose to every city official that won't hang up on you. If this facility is built you better believe that city planning is standing at the front of the line with their hand out to collect their fees.

I say we don't need it. Has anyone looked at the "Hot Topics"? "Proposed budget cuts could impact public safety" is just a couple of lines under the proposed re-entry facility! Let's bring more issues to our city with less enforcement!?!

This town is already a joke with it's rookie deputies and inexperienced PD. We need to have public safety figured out before we add to our issues with this.

El Rancho isn't the only neighborhood. There's the neighborhood on the Northeast side of Lacey and Hwy 43 that needs to be remembered too...

NO on the facility. There are better places. "

citizen wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:32 PM:

" Some of these comments lead me to believe you really dont know much about how close are homes are to this location let alone Kit Carson School. I think all these so called stats the county has toshare with us are just a bunch of misleading statements. The bottom line The people of this district should have the right to our opinions and should have a huge impact on the final decision. We already house the majority of the released molesters in the surrounding motels, Everybody deserves a second chance, but, personally I dont want to be the neighbor to see if you make it or break it. And about these families and friends of the inmate, have you ever heard" Birds of a feather stick together". I dont want these people hanging out in my neighborhood waiting for visiting hours, or parking and sleeping in cars outside my house. No thanks. What about the big boost this will have for the economy. I believe that one. What about the value of our homes decreasing daily because of our economy, this facility will make it lose more value! "

To Carl wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:40 AM:

" Carl: There is a school east of the proposed location called Kit Carson School, 198 at 7th.

WDF- I actually agree with you about retaining services at prison sites by putting re-entry facilities there. Great thought, comment and content. It makes great sense. "

I NEVER VOTED ON THIS... wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:51 AM:

" 30 MILLON DOLLARS TO SALE US ALL OUT, WHAT A DAMN SHAME.. THESE ARE SUPPOSE TO BE LEADERS AND REPS TO THE CITIZENS OF KINGS COUNTY... WHY DONT YOU ALL GET US A 24 HOUR GUN SHOP HERE BEFORE YOU APPROVE YOUR OWN NOTIONS.... "

ALEJANDRO wrote on Aug 30, 2008 1:47 PM:

" Here are some ‘coincidences' in the Saturday Sentinel:

Bob Williams suddenly goes belly-up. Needs cash. CA. State needs a place for Re-Entry Facility . . . to educate convicts before release in auto mechanics, etc. and WHCC also is so very close.

And what about that request for bids from Noland & Esqs. for sale of 129.3 acres at 18th and Jackson in today's paper? For a minimum mere 0.9 million dollars. Is that the Bob Williams property too?

If we HAD to have this ‘gift package' and a majority of the citizens want it (not likely), it really should be out of the mainstream, like on Corcoran State Prison acreage, Kettleman City (could use an economic boost there, no?) or even as a last resort on the Bob Williams site or on the Noland acreage that's for sale.

At least it's not welcoming drivers to the City of Hanford right on our front doorstep! "

Please Come and Oppose wrote on Aug 30, 2008 4:12 PM:

" If you are in opposition of the proposed re-entry facility, there will be a Community Meeting on Thursday September 4th at Kit Carson. Although this notice was sent to me as a resident in District 5, I think this is such an important issue for Hanford, that we should all attend. This is a bad prospect for our community. First I would like to express my greatest disappointment with our City and County that they would willfully participate in the bribery tactics of the State. To withold money unless demands are met is a form of bribery. Secondly we are sacrificing public safety and exposing Hanford citizens to external pressures all for the sake of money. I would also like to point out that there are major traffic concerns, security concerns, utility concerns (can the City really expect to supply a new facility with water by just drilling another well...I will personally challenge them in the EIR process). It is time for the community to speak up, please come to the community meeting or call your local official. It only takes a few minutes, "

Ashamed of Supervisors wrote on Aug 30, 2008 4:17 PM:

" I am ashamed of our Supervisors and City elected officials for chasing the dollar at the cost of public safety future community issues surrounding an incarceration facility. I propose it is time to ask our leaders to step down and elect person of integrity, who will look after the concerns and safety of the public. I would not be so harsh if I did not feel that our Supervisors lack any ability to rationally work through a problem and jump at the demands of the State. Once the State facility is allowed in, they dictate the rules. Don't let this happen. "

Hanford mom wrote on Aug 30, 2008 6:52 PM:

" What time sept 4th?? This should be in the first page of the sentinal and hope with coverage..
Come on Jackie this is our town at stake!!!!!
Thanks to the one for the heads up I will be there.. "

Call To Hanford Citizens wrote on Aug 31, 2008 11:11 AM:

" It is time that we exercise out right to relay out opinion to our local officials. If we fail to do this now, we fail to protect our town from the long-term negative effects of this facility. We are the large population center in Kings County and we need to make it clear that the identity of our community is going to be threatened by this facility. We also need to put out public officials on notice, that taking money from the State as a motive to build this facility is unacceptable. Please this only takes a few minutes of your day. Make this a priority and call the County at 582-3211 or the city of Hanford and let them know that we value our identity as a small farming community, and that we don't want to be in the business of housing prisoners and dealing with the side effects of such a facility. "

FIX EXISTING PROBLEMS wrote on Aug 31, 2008 7:10 PM:

" i think everyone has been hearing how so many deputies have left and other problems within the dept admin. beings this is going to be county and the sheriif will have jurisdiction lets fix one thing at a time.. i dont think the people need to keep being sold out of there voices,rights,nor there personal safety/health welfare. i want to know publicly whos behind this both for and against this... this so called revenue isnt going to put many local people to work others yes, but still not at the cost of our safety.. "

Devils Advocate wrote on Sep 1, 2008 4:11 PM:

" Ok, I get the idea behind calling the Supervisors and Council members to let them know your opposition; its a great idea if you don't want this thing built locally.

However, I say we need to lay off the leaders themselves - WE voted down the bond issues that would have taken care of the new jail. Its OUR fault. It would be wrong to tar-and-feather a Supervisor for doing the only thing they could do to pay for the jail we desperately need. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts