Currently
48°
Cloudy

Advertisement





Opinion

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



California Focus: Why Feinstein should run

Who says print journalism is a dead duck? Yes, many newspapers have cut staff and some have cut down the very size of their pages. But one remarkable recent political event demonstrates newspapers still have more clout than any other medium.

That came when former state Assembly Speaker and ex-San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown proposed in a newspaper column he had barely begun to write that Democratic U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein run for governor.

If she "does get in," Brown wrote, "it's over, at least on the Democratic side. Everybody, and I mean everybody, steps out."

Well, maybe everyone drops out and maybe not. But for sure, Feinstein is the elephant in the living room, the one political figure no one in California wants to run against.

And she should run for governor. Yes, Feinstein has a lot of seniority in the Senate, where she has served since 1992. Yes, she still has work to do there, especially if she becomes chairman of the Intelligence Committee, as appears all but certain.

But isn't it about time California had a real grownup a governor? Someone who knows how to work with politicians from both parties, plus big labor and big business. Someone who knows how to represent a constituency. Someone with nowhere further to go in politics who would be out for the best interests of California's future and little else.

Over the last 30 years, this state has seen the sterile reigns of Pete Wilson and George Deukmejian, whose lack of vision saw to it that almost no improvements to California's lifestyle and infrastructure were even proposed during their tenures. Think about their approach when sitting in a traffic jam or dealing with the water rationing that's likely to come to most parts of the state.

There was also Jerry Brown, whose administration in the late 1970s and early 1980s was full of slogans like "small is beautiful," but accomplished little that has lasted. Add in Gray Davis, who often seemed to cave to whatever special interests wrote him the largest campaign checks.

And then there's been Arnold Schwarzenegger, showman supreme, but a governor who flails aimlessly when legislators don't do precisely as he instructs. He began his term by issuing orders to then-Attorney General Bill Lockyer about what lawsuits to file -- only to discover he had no such authority. More recently, he ordered state Controller John Chiang to cut the pay of many thousands of state workers during the annual budget wrangling, only to discover that Chiang was independently elected, is not one of his slavish appointees and didn't have to obey.

Image has counted for more than substance from the start of Schwarzenegger's tenure, and polls indicate the hype is wearing thin.

But Feinstein as governor -- a job she sought unsuccessfully in 1990 -- might change all that.

She has vision. No one in California has fought harder for solutions to the state's longstanding water problems. No one in the Senate has done more to try to preserve civil liberties. No one has a better grasp of California's problems and what to do about them.

Would Feinstein like the job? Well, she wanted it once before. She will be 77 on Election Day 2010, so it's unlikely that she would use the office as a stepping stone to anything else. At that age, all the red-eye flights to Washington, D.C. that go with being a senator from California can't be much fun.

Meanwhile, other candidates both Democratic and Republican have not provided much vision. Brown wants to be governor again. But he has yet to articulate why in any coherent manner. Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, who also has an excellent grasp of the state's problems and potential solutions, has never demonstrated much ability to work with Republicans. Beyond simple ambition, neither Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa nor San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has expressed a good reason for running. Nor has state Schools Supt. Jack O'Connell. Defeated 2006 Democratic candidate Phil Angelides has talked about why he still wants the job -- things like taking better care of the environment, consumer interests and the poor. But he has long been charismatically challenged. The same for Steve Westly, the former state controller Angelides beat in the primary three years ago.

Then there are the Republicans. Tom Campbell, their current poll leader, is a former congressman who has run statewide twice and failed miserably both times. State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner hasn't yet demonstrated he can work with Democrats who control the Legislature any better than Schwarzenegger. And dot.com plutocrats like Meg Whitman (ex-chief of eBay) and Carly Fiorina (deposed head of Hewlett Packard) have yet to offer much explanation of why they want to run.

Without Feinstein, then, it's a large field that would surely produce an interesting campaign season. But Feinstein towers over them all in both achievement and popularity. She should run, for the good of California.

Thomas D. Elias is a syndicated columnist on California issues.

(Nov. 25, 2008)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

White5000 wrote on Nov 25, 2008 3:22 PM:

" Yes! Hear, hear! I'd vote for her above anyone else, hands down. There would be no one better for the job! "

Deb wrote on Nov 25, 2008 4:14 PM:

" She too would have my vote. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Nov 26, 2008 7:14 PM:

" Of course she would, that is two very good reasons she wouldn't have mine. She is looking for a second government retirement check and nothing more. She will already dip deep into the federal retirment plan and now she wishes to dip into the State one as well. Running for Senate again will not increase her retirement at this point. Think about it California why else would she step down as a Senator in the United States Senate to be a Govenor in her own home state, it usually works the other way around, does it not?
That would be like John McCain quitting to become Govenor of Arizona. "

Alihandero wrote on Nov 29, 2008 7:57 AM:

" Tom McClintock would make an awesome Governor! "

B. wrote on Nov 29, 2008 11:23 AM:

" Ali........check out my response to Mrs. D in the fun tax comment on Tom since she`s never heard of him. Maybe one day the people in this state will wake up and start voting for more QUALIFIED people to make the proper decisions like.......
CUT SPENDING where it should be cut instead of RAISING TAXES as the solution for everything.
But......that might be way to much to ask for a bunch of UN-QUALIFIED VOTERS. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Dec 2, 2008 8:31 PM:

" The state wouldn't know whether to embalm her or just have her cremated. She's older than dirt and twice as nasty. Forget it, she couldn't run a Yugo much less this state. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


SENTINEL BLOGS

Going All-in by Richard de Give

Shout-outs for the Bullpups!

Thought we’d change things up a little bit to let all of you in cyberland send your best wishes to Hanford High’s football team as it gets ready for Friday’s Central Section Division III championship game. The Bullpups (12-1) are in the title game for the first time since 1982, and this Friday’s title game [...]

Daydream Island by Shannon Milliken

38 Things

I know, I know. It’s been a long time. But I’m back on the blogs again and thanks to my coverage of education I’ve got something to say in light of tomorrow’s holiday. (haha, I rhyme, and get ready, because this is going to be cheesy). So, in school, the teachers typically have their students write [...]

Sentinel Online by Josh Parrish

Sentinel Photo Galleries

You might have noticed we just launched our new photo gallery section.  Not only will you get to sift through multiple new galleries every week from our excellent photographers, Apolinar Fonseca and Gary Feinstein, but you will be able to look at local readers’ photos as well. Enthusiasts, parents with a camera, or anyone else can [...]

Going All-in by Richard de Give

Fearful Football Forecast: Week 12

Are some of these leagues getting so predictable that even I can predict them right? I was just doing last week’s totals and can’t believe I again nailed just about all of them. The one miss, the Cowboys, of course. I generally haven’t fared well in these things at other papers, seriously! 13-1 again, now [...]

Publisher's Desk by Randy Rickman

How Obama Got Elected

We have all heard about media bias and its alleged effect on the outcome of the recent election. This topic was brought up in another blog community and we discussed it to death. One of my colleagues sent me a link to a website that features a video taped on election day. The video features twelve Obama voters that were [...]

> More Blogs


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

Selma:

Kingsburg:



EMAIL UPDATES

Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
E-Mail:
Daily News Updates
Breaking News Alerts