Currently
57°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Year in Review: Hanford government -- a year of controversy and change

The corn ethanol controversy hit home in Hanford in 2008. A distilling plant proposed by Great Valley Ethanol -- a $115 million project pushed by the boom -- was proposed in south Hanford. Despite concerns over its impact on air quality and water supply, it was approved, prompting a lawsuit. In February, prosecutors criminally charged a former director of the city-funded visitor agency for embezzlement. The prosecution came a year after a major financial shortfall and budget irregularities within the tax-funded organization came to light.

It was another year marked with a string of controversies that culminated in the closure of two separate criminal cases against two successive former city managers.

It was also a year of change. Marcie Buford -- the longest-serving city councilwoman -- retired after 20 years in office, while Sue Sorensen won a competitive race to replace Buford.

On a positive note, 2008 also changed a lot for Hanford residents in terms of economic, educational and recreational opportunities. The Hanford Joint Educational Center made significant progress, while the much-anticipated renovation of the old Sears building downtown got under way.

Here's a look at Hanford's top stories of the year:

Tucci scandal

The budget irregularity might have been fixed at the visitor agency, but a person allegedly responsible for it didn't get away with it.

In February, the Kings County District Attorney charged Ralph Tucci, former head of the city-funded agency, with felony embezzlement and grand theft charges.

The prosecution of Tucci, 67, of Fresno came almost a year after financial records were turned over from the agency for criminal investigation. Tucci retired in 2007 amid the agency's major financial shortfall.

Inspection of records by The Sentinel had found that Tucci had charged more than $15,500 on a Bank of America credit card, the existence of which had previously been unknown to board members. The records also showed repeated gas purchases by Tucci with the organization's credit card amounting to $3,000.

In October, Tucci pleaded guilty to misusing public funds.

The charge is punishable by up to three years in prison.

But a prosecutor in the case says he will be recommending probation to the court, given the fact that Tucci has shown remorse and is paying back the money.

Tucci's sentencing is scheduled to take place on Jan. 6.

Ethanol debate

Is grain ethanol really green? That question took center stage in the ethanol debate that began brewing in Hanford this spring.

As Bakersfield-based Great Valley Ethanol proposed to build a corn-ethanol distilling plant in south Hanford, neighbors and environmental advocates cried foul over the economic and environmental viability of the technology, and challenged city approval of the project.

After months of testimony and debate, Hanford decision-makers approved the permit application by the company for a $115 million plant in the low-tax south Hanford industrial park. The action denied an appeal by opponents who challenged the legality of the earlier decision by the Planning Commission.

The controversy didn't end there.

The following month, a citizens group advocating for better air went to court to try to stop the project.

The lawsuit came despite numerous mitigation measures adopted by the company to address concerns. For example, the company would pay a Kings County water agency for any water usage exceeding the historical use of water for the property. The company also signed a deal with the Attorney General's Office to pay $1 million over the first three years to the air board's pollution mitigation fund.

A settlement was reached this fall beween the environmental groups and the city.

City managers in court

Two city managers. Two criminal cases.

Both cases, which dragged out for more than a year, came to a close this year.

One received exoneration. The other did not.

Former City Manager Alan Christensen, who mysteriously resigned in May 2007 after only nine months in office, faced misdemeanor forgery and grand theft stemming from how he was reimbursed for moving expenses.

Under his contract, he was supposed to get three bids from different companies and take the lowest, but he didn't. Christensen admitted that he altered paperwork to take the middle bid in a hurry to move his family from Bakersfield.

Christensen stood trial in March. The trial resulted in a mistrial, but prosecutors vowed to pursue a second trial.

The case was brought to a close in May, however, when Christensen pleaded no-contest to a misdemeanor grand theft charge and was sentenced to probation and a fine.

Meanwhile, Christensen's immediate predecessor, Jan Reynolds, found closure for his situation.

In October, state prosecutors dismissed all charges against Reynolds, who had been awaiting trial on allegations of lying under oath to the grand jury. The state attorney general's office determined charges could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The dismissal brought closure to the 2 1/2-year-old criminal case that could have sent Reynolds to prison if he were convicted. He has maintained his innocence all along.

Reynolds was accused of lying under oath to the grand jury during its investigation into a $200,000-plus severance package he had negotiated with the City Council when he was pressured into retirement in 2005. Grand jury findings led to his prosecution.

A breakthrough for Reynolds came in July, when the relentless defense by his attorneys convinced the judge to disqualify the entire district attorney's office from prosecuting him. The case was subsequently taken over by the state Attorney General's Office.

City leadership change

A new era for the City Council dawned in December with the retirement of a veteran councilwoman, the swearing-in of a new member and a reorganization of leadership.

Marcie Buford, a 20-year veteran on the council, retired, and Sue Sorensen came in to represent District B. Sorensen, a former city planning commissioner and former high school trustee, won the Nov. 4 election, beating out three other candidates who sought to fill the post being vacated by Buford.

Councilman David Ayers became the council's new chairman and mayor and Councilman Dan Chin, who was reelected in November, became vice mayor.

The city also announced the hiring of Hilary Straus as the city's new co-deputy city manager in December.

Straus, 37, is a former assistant to the city manager of Citrus Heights, a newly incorporated city of 87,000 near Sacramento.

Hanford had been without a co-deputy manager since April, when Tom Haglund left to take a top city administrator's job in Gilroy. Mary Lindsay is another deputy city manager.

Learning Center

The Hanford Joint Education Center is taking shape -- very quickly.

In March, the new 17-acre softball complex opened. The center is a replica of the well-known Buchanan High School complex in Clovis, but on a slightly larger scale, and is expected to put Hanford on the recreation map of the region.

The ballpark was the first of a series of projects completed for the 180-acre complex west of Centennial Avenue -- a joint venture 10 years in the making by the city, College of the Sequoias and the high school. The complex will bring together a new high school, COS campus, the sports complex and the vocational training facility in one location.

In November, the vocational training center -- another city project done in partnership with COS -- was completed. The center is scheduled to open to students in January.

Meanwhile, construction is humming along at Sierra Pacific High School, which is expected to open in the coming fall. In December, construction of the new COS campus -- the final installment of the educational center -- got under way as well. The COS campus is expected to open in fall 2010.

Old Sears building

A major renovation is pushing ahead on the old Sears building downtown.

Once a thriving cornerstone of downtown, the building has remained vacant for nearly a decade after Sears moved out to the Hanford Mall area.

The building has since changed hands twice.

Real progress came when FAST Credit Union purchased the landmark last year. The building dates back to the 1940s, when Sears was the retail giant in town.

FAST plans to refurbish the building into its former glory. A $5 million project, handled by a San Luis Obispo architect, is expected to give the building a look that will blend in with the historic look of downtown Hanford.

The renovation is expected to be completed by the fall of 2009.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2429.

(Jan. 1, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Tony wrote on Jan 1, 2009 12:14 PM:

" Living in a 'good ole boy' town we must expect this type of disturbing 'coincidences' in our city government.
Hanford. Just small enough where you can get away with it.
Thanks to the Sentinel. At least SOMEBODYS looking out for us. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 1, 2009 7:58 PM:

" With the new council comes the same old time traditions to be aware of, remember this one:

A new addition to a 1952 law:

Changes to the Brown Act Effective July 1, 2008
Effective July 1, 2008, the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”), imposes additional requirements on local agencies concerning regular meeting agendas and documents prepared by the agency for regular meetings. (See Government Code Section 54957.5.)




Current law requires that, when the local agency distributes non-confidential documents or writings prepared by the agency to all or a majority of members of a legislative body of a local agency during a meeting, the writings become public records and must be available to members of the public at that time.

Effective July 1, Section 54957.5 requires:

Any non-confidential documents or writings that the agency distributes, less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, to all or a majority
of the legislative body's members, must be available to members of the public at the same time as distribution.
. (Continued) "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 1, 2009 8:02 PM:

" With the new council comes the same old time traditions to be aware of, remember this one:

A new addition to a 1952 law:

(Continued) Effective July 1, Section 54957.5 requires:

Any non-confidential documents or writings that the agency distributes, less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, to all or a majority
of the legislative body's members, must be available to members of the public at the same time as distribution.
The agency must identify on all agendas the address of the public office or location where the writings are available.
In addition to making the records available at the designated location, the agency may post the documents on its website.

I wonder if the postings will be a month in arears like the minutes of the meetings. That is if they may post the documents on its website?

I still say all non-confidential council meetings should be televised locally to all residents of the city of Hanford via the cable network. What are they trying to hide, be on television and be truthful is that too much to ask? "

sam wrote on Jan 4, 2009 1:39 PM:

" Watchdog Fred... Yes! It is too much, to ask any counsel member to be truthful. I'm quite certain there is no section in 'the codes' regarding honesty. "

Transplant wrote on Jan 4, 2009 8:10 PM:

" Fred, the minutes are posted later because they must be approved by the Council before posting on the website. That means at least one meeting after the original meeting. Sometimes that is the next month. But I don't think they are trying to hide anything. Go to the meetings and you won't have to wait for the minutes. Oh, I forgot. You don't need to go. Your mind reading/speculation allows you to know what will happen in advance. "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 4, 2009 10:03 PM:

" Fred,

Our city council meetings aren’t televised for two obvious reasons:
1) Doing so is expensive.
2) No one wants to attend the meetings as scheduled and no one will want to watch them on TV.

If you attend a meeting as promised, and bring your politically aspiring spouse, the audience would nearly double. Perhaps the resulting “crowd” would cause the council to consider spending some of our tax dollars on broadcasting the empty council chamber. "

Alan G wrote on Jan 6, 2009 12:58 PM:

" Oolon - I used to live in Burbank and they televised their city council meetings regularly and it was HILARIOUS to watch. I think the local gadflies are what made the meetings so funny. It was always (and still is) the same cast of characters week after week.

Hmmmm, I wonder which local gadflies would star in the Hanford version? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 6, 2009 5:13 PM:

" TO: ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS & ANYONE ELSE WILLING TO LISTEN . . . .

I did some research and my original information was not correct so I updated it and I challenge any or all of you to go to www.granicus.com and reveiew what they have to offer this city government. This is the system Barstow and many other cities throughout Southern California utitilize and have found their constituate backing increasing beyond their own belief.
They provide the visual aides to provide not only the City Council, but Planning, Recreation and any other Department who wishes to conduct business above board and with integrity the availability of a system that works for all departments.
Please go to the site and click on the preview and see if you don't think they could offer a valuable service to our community at a reasonable cost. How many people work the night shift or the 3 pm to midnight shift and can't attend a city council meeting, here they can bring it up on their computer and view parts or the entire meeting. If you doubt their history ask for references? "

Bobb wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:40 AM:

" Fred; I checked out the Granicus web-site and it is quite interesting. The broadcasting of Council Meetings via television is most likely cost prohibitive but the Internet solution is a very good idea. The speed of the Internet and the cost of the web-site would probably be more cost effective and give citizens who cannot attend the meetings access 24/7. It would be interesting to know the cost of this service. "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:02 PM:

" I also like Fred’s suggestion.

A Google search, covering published meeting minutes of communities considering the service, suggests it costs around $25K to $30K to install - plus a monthly fee to maintain (about $500). The proposals I have read require existing audio and video equipment to which the system can be integrated. I believe Hanford is slated to remodel the City Council chambers in 2009, so the timing is good.

Rather than just blog about it, I called my councilperson and suggested the city research the opportunity further. "

Joe Friday wrote on Jan 7, 2009 9:07 PM:

" Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 1, 2009
"I still say all non-confidential council meetings should be televised locally to all residents of the city of Hanford via the cable network."

I agree Fred, Comcast, as part of the agreement giving them the Cable TV franchise in Hanford is required to provide a public access station at no cost to the city. The only investment would be for the camera equipment. The last time I heard this discussed the cost would be a one-time investment in the $10-20K range.

I've seen this done in other cities and as Alan G. said it can be both informative and entertaining... "

Alan G wrote on Jan 9, 2009 12:20 PM:

" Why not tape the meetings and put the best bits up on YouTube? A person could do that with their home digital video camera and it would cost no more than tape stock. A "highlite reel" if you will. "

Alihandero wrote on Jan 9, 2009 3:14 PM:

" Hey Alan G.,

Are these "gadflies" you refer to the same as Ms. D's "drunken voters?"

Well, at least they would be OUR LOCAL "gadflies" who actually live here and not hundreds or even thousands of miles away! "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 9, 2009 5:38 PM:

" Alan G,

You said: “A person could do that with their home digital video camera and it would cost no more than tape stock.”

Your statement is true, provided it doesn’t have to be done by a paid city employee (who has other dutues). It’s only “free” if done by a volunteer. Care to offer your services? "

Alan G wrote on Jan 9, 2009 6:26 PM:

" gad·fly (gad'fli) n.
1. A persistent irritating critic; a nuisance.
2. One that acts as a provocative stimulus; a goad. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 10, 2009 10:17 PM:

" To: Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:02 PM

You mean your council member actually called you back who must that be? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 10, 2009 10:24 PM:

" Please check out Granicus before you respond? But if all we are after is the meeting be televised a simple video camcorder hooked up to a laptop would probably accomplish it. Add a simple cd copy capability and you could also have the 24/7 capability. The video camera would have to be one that had 360* capability so the council members and audience speakers could be filmed.

I am glad to see so many people see the reasoning for this exposure of our Council to the citizens. Also, unless it was an employee classified manner any rebuttal as to what happened or didn't happen would be available for everyone to witness. Not like our City Council ever disagrees, but that would be shown as well. This might eliminate any cursing and bad behavior I've heard leak out of the meetings. What is wrong with the citizens having viewership of the councils actions 24/7, what is there to be hidden about city business issues? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 10, 2009 10:25 PM:

" There is another way to look at this, the city council members are employees of the citizens are they not? Don't most employers today video tape their work spaces? "

Alihandero wrote on Jan 11, 2009 2:57 PM:

" Well Alan, best to use an accepted Thesaurus to find out what "gadfly" means:

Synonyms for gadfly:

annoyance, energizer, excitant, irritant, motivator, mover, pest, prod, spur, stimulator

- Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition

That's ALL OF US, Baby! "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 11, 2009 9:16 PM:

" Fred,

You said: " There is another way to look at this, the city council members are employees of the citizens are they not? Don't most employers today video tape their work spaces? "

The answer are "no, elected officials are not employees" and "no, the vast of majority of businesses do not video tape their work places". "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 12, 2009 2:30 PM:

" To: Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 11, 2009 11:16 PM:

I don't know how to break this to you, but cameras are every where in every work space today. They do not have to notify you they are there as long as they don't hook up audio to them. That sir is the law, but they can video tape you anywhere but the restroom and they are working on that one. The Post Offices even have catwalks built into them where not only cameras may pry but supervisors may walk and watch the employees. So don't tell me they aren't in Government buildings either. Food processing centers are required to have them installed to make sure no one tampers with our food supply and if they do they will be caught on tape doing so. I had three cameras at the Dairy Distribution Center I managed so don't tell me they aren't there. I could set in my office and see the loading dock, walk in cooler and freezer. Any and all businesses are using them you can't walk into a retail outlet and not be on camera. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 12, 2009 2:35 PM:

" To: Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 11, 2009 11:16 PM:

Technically you may be correct the City Council may not be our employees. But the funny thing is everyone of them including Dan Chin informed us he does our business and is working for us everyday of the week. So if that is how he feels, wouldn't that classify him as working for us the citizens of Hanford?
Like I said as long as it doesn't have audio you can do it without their knowledge. But if you want to have audio then by law you are required to tell them up front.
As for the retail businesses and government services agencies they are private or government owned facilities and they can do with their property whatever they wish. Check it out Oolon, another educational tidbit for you.
Do the banks ask your permission to film you when you conduct business with them. When you stop by the convenience store do all of them have signs telling you, you may be on camera. When you enter retail stores like Super~Wal~mart do you think those shaded globes in the cielings are mirrors? "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jan 12, 2009 2:42 PM:

" To: Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 11, 2009 11:16 PM:

Also the food processing plants are told by their insurance companies they must film and tape workspaces in order to be covered on their policies. They can deny payment of a policy if the cameras are not in place and the tapes kept on file for a period of time.
You think taping doesn't happen walk into any casino and ask about the eye in the sky program they have. Just watch a television show some night when they are talking about casino security in the gambling areas, counting areas, elevators, hallways, entrances, receiving area, food services area, exits everywhere but the private hotel rooms.
When you are in a casino and you aren't in bed sleeping you are on camera. Yes even in their parking lots. So for you to say cameras aren't used is not factual and I don't know who you work for but if they don't have cameras in the workspace they are taking a large risk of w/c to say the least. Do you not catch the phrase security camera? They are there for protection. "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 12, 2009 9:41 PM:

" Fred,

A reminder, you said: “Don't most employers today video tape their work spaces? "

Without regard to your 3-post, 600-word response, and numerous examples of where cameras are deployed, the answer to your question remains the same “No, most employers today do not tape their work spaces”.

Perhaps you forget just how big the United States really is, or how many small business truly exist. Or, perhaps, you intended to exaggerate for dramatic effect. "

Joe Friday wrote on Jan 13, 2009 1:08 PM:

" Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 11, 2009 11:16 PM:
"no, elected officials are not employees"

Well the fact of the matter is that the City of Hanford is a Municipal Corporation with the City Council serving as it's Board, so in this case I believe that the term "employee" applies. "

Oolon Colluphid wrote on Jan 13, 2009 11:13 PM:

" Joe Friday,

You said: “Well the fact of the matter is that the City of Hanford is a Municipal Corporation with the City Council serving as it's Board, so in this case I believe that the term "employee" applies.”

You are correct, they are considered employees, and I was mistaken. It appears their status was set by the IRS and the Social Security Administration for tax purposes. Thank you for correcting my error.

Those wishing to learn more can do so here: http://www.csmfo.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=DetailGroup&CID=1620&NavID=177 "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts