Currently
36°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



High school district to revise its transfer policy

Local siblings may no longer necessarily attend high school together beginning in the fall, according to one of the changes to the Hanford Joint Union High School District's intra-district transfer policy.

The district's trustees set new attendance boundaries on Nov. 25 for Sierra Pacific High School's opening in the fall. But as several local parents had asked the possibility for intra-district tranfers, trustees and Superintendent Bill Fishbough saw the need to revisit and revise the district intra-district transfer policy. Policy changes are expected to be approved by trustees at their meeting on Tuesday.

The newly-set attendance boundaries will mark no change to existing Hanford High boundaries, except that students in the portion of Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School District west of 12th Avenue will attend Sierra Pacific instead of Hanford High. But a portion of Hanford Elementary School District from 12th Avenue east to the existing Hanford High boundary and part of Pioneer school district bounded by Flint Avenue, Fargo Avenue, 10th Avenue and the railroad would be included in the Hanford West boundary. Students in the Armona school district, and the portion of Hanford Elementary School District west of 12th Avenue, and Pioneer -- except the portion already mentioned -- will feed into Sierra Pacific.

District officials asked for community input in making the decision for boundaries. Instead of specifying an option, most people who provided feedback to the district had questions about intra-district transfer criteria and about whether equal programs would be offered at Sierra Pacific High School.

Now, and when Sierra Pacific opens, students are required to attend the school in the boundaries of their residence, unless they meet specified intra-district transfer criteria.

Fishbough said Friday that incoming freshmen have begun to register for the fall at Hanford High, Hanford West and Sierra Pacific. People also have begun to visit the district office and request transfer forms, but that is not uncommon for this time of year, Fishbough said.

People who do request transfers will be subject to the new guidelines outlined in the board policy and administrative regulations set to be approved on Tuesday.

The new policy language dictates that "siblings are no longer a criteria" for transfers to be granted to incoming freshmen, Fishbough said. Future approved transfer requests will be based around a student's special needs or interest in a non-duplicated academic program. The only expected non-duplicated academic program next year will be Naval Reserve Officers Training Corps, which will only be offered at the Hanford West campus.

"Ag will have a presence on all campuses next year," Fishbough said.

Among incoming freshmen, any student who has demonstrated an interest in the military or a related field will be given first consideration for enrollment in the Naval Junior Reserve Officer Training Program. Should approval be granted, a minimum two-year commitment is required, according to the anticipated new regulation.

If approved, students who submit applications to the district by March 30 will be eligible to be considered for a transfer. These students will be ineligible to participate in any prior sport for 12 months from the first date of attendance at the new school. However, all incoming freshman students are eligible at their first high school of attendance.

According to the anticipated new administrative regulation, incoming freshmen may request to attend a school outside of their attendance area if they have a special need or hardship. But a sibling already attending another school and a parent employed by the school district are no longer criteria for transfers for incoming freshmen.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2424.

(Jan. 12, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

cynic wrote on Jan 12, 2009 11:23 AM:

" Cue up the whining from Pioneer "

Jethro wrote on Jan 12, 2009 8:02 PM:

" Cynic, what's this got to do with Pioneer? This effects people from several elem districts. It is simply wrong not to allow siblings to attend the same high school. Same can be said for school employees... where it could cause an unusual hardship on them, if their children are forced to attend separate schools.

This whole boundary process has been solely about social demographics. Sending kids who live in east Hanford and near Hanford HS to Hanford West does not promote the neighborhood school theory which the District claimed they supported. The selected boundaries are solely about demographics, and common sense decisions are thrown out the window in order to keep certain ethnic groups from complaining, plain and simple. Now, they are being closed minded when it comes to transfers, by doing the easy thing for the school and not the families. Bob Hill was the only one willing to listen to reason... Bob will be missed in more ways than one! "

Mrs.D wrote on Jan 13, 2009 7:06 AM:

" No whining, cynic. A good majority of Pioneer will be going to Hanford West. "

Uncle Buck wrote on Jan 13, 2009 3:05 PM:

" Wow. What about the aquatics programs? Sierra Pacific doesn't have a pool. Is the district going to bus kids and have the 3 schools share pool time? If I understand the districts new "policy" a parent working at Sierra Pacific but living in the Hanford High district can NOT transfer their kid to Sierra Pacific. But if the parent lives in Lemoore or Corcoran and works at Sierra Pacific they can transfer their kids. We are only denying transfers within our own District? Dumb.

Glad to hear the AG program will be available at all 3 schools. Now hopefully the BS about recruiting will stop. "

Carl.Spackler wrote on Jan 13, 2009 10:27 PM:

" Insanity. "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 15, 2009 12:27 PM:

" To Mrs. D, what happened to all that great info that you had that all the Pioneer kids would be kept together and sent to Sierra?
To the others complaining about the hardships of some adult working at one school and their child attending another school, where I grew up that was the rule, didn't want any conflict of interest if you know what I mean. If you keep mother hen too close to the chicks they will never mature, and from what I have heard there is too much of that going on here in Hanford. The parents ensure that their child is given a free ride. Well guess what, you can't be a Helicopter parent forever (hovering around your child 24/7). I might be a bit more sympathetic for toddlers, but come on, we are talking about teenagers or even young adults here. There is no better policy then trying to do it based upon a physical map. "

Mrs.D wrote on Jan 16, 2009 7:01 AM:

" RE:NotHomeGrown, Pioneer Middle School wanted to keep the students together when they enter the ninth grade. Well, a majority will be together when they attend Hanford West in the fall. Voila, they're together!

However, if there are some special needs that are required, then some parents will be sending their children elsewhere. Not all kids want to participate in NJROTC so going somewhere else will leave room for students who want to participate in the program.

A little hovering is all right once in a while, NotHomeGrown. That's what keeps them from bringing homemade pipe bombs to school or lashing out at administration. "

Jethro wrote on Jan 17, 2009 11:14 PM:

" NotHomeG... I wouldnt call parents wanting to see their kids participate in extra curricular activities "helicopter parents". If a school employee's child is required to attend a different campus, then it could mean the employee will be forced to miss some of their child's school events. Due to the schools conflicting schedules the employee may be at one venue, while their child is at another. Why not leave it up to the school employees to decide whether or not it is best for their child to attend the school in which they work? As it's been stated, people who transfer in from out of the District are currently granted more freedom than those who live in it. The District seems to have gone from one extreme to the other when it comes to transfers. The District truly appears to be putting what's easiest on them first, before trying to accommodate families. Also, can someone answer why siblings should attend separate campuses..? There simply is no good reason for siblings NOT to attend the same school. Put families first! "

Carl.Spackler wrote on Jan 18, 2009 8:18 PM:

" Well said Jethro.

Put familes first! "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 19, 2009 8:48 PM:

" To Mrs. D and Jethro, Why are you only concerned about people working at the school. I wish that I could make the world revolve around me too! If I want to see my child in any venue I need to take leave, can't just have my kid with me. Life isn't perfect, and I was implying and will state outright this time, that sometimes the kids need to be away from their parents so their misbehaviour doesn't get covered up. I was also adressing Mrs. D and her know it all attitude that it would only be all of the Pioneer schoold kids going to Sierra, now see how fast she is about backtracking and trying to make it appear that the "majority" will attend West. Sorry for West, so many snobs in one place. I for one am for diversity, where you come from doesn't make you better or smarter, but to break up the clans is great, increase the gene pool. (continued) "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 19, 2009 8:56 PM:

" To Mrs. D and Jethro, (continued) I will state that perhaps allowing a request for siblings to attend the same campus should be considered, but not guarantied. If there is someone else with a more compelling reason to be there, that should be the priority. Did either of you have one child in an elementary school and one in a Middle school? Talk about different campuses. So what is the difference? Guess you will want you kids to attend the same college? Sometime siblings need to be seperated, helps with their gaining self esteem. Better to be known as themselves rahter than so-and-so's little brother or sister.
Jethro, how is any more of a hardship for someone in the Hanford Joint Unified School District than for a teacher in the Hanford Elementary School district or even Pioneer school district. Again I will say this are young adults that need to be away from their overprotective parents. Again let the children learn about the real world without mommy or daddy there to cover up their misdeeds. "

Carl.Spackler wrote on Jan 20, 2009 10:18 PM:

" Not Home Grown: I guess the thing is that it would be nice if parents had some sort of say in where their kids went to high school for whatever the reason. If they have one kid at Hanford High already, why can't they have both kids at the same school if that is the way they want it? Why does it have to be so complicated? It should be about parental choice, which has been removed to accomplish some idiotic quota system. "

Jethro wrote on Jan 21, 2009 3:10 AM:

" NotHG... youre entitled to your opinion, know matter how warped it may be. Your comparisons are like apples to oranges...Having a child in Elem school and one in Jr High is not the same as having two children attend separate (rival) high schools. If you dont have a problem with it... fine! However, those of us who want our kids on the same campus should be accommodated. Why do people like you try to shove your beliefs down the throats of others? Whats the harm in siblings attending the same school, how does that go against diversity? The District took your social demographics concern into consideration, thus why kids who live on the east side of town are traveling clear across town to West, all in the name of diversity. You claim it's bad to have all the snobs at one school, yet oppose those who want to possibly transfer out. Far too many people try to instill their social and political agendas into today's school systems and that is the very thing which is wrong with our schools. As I stated, put families first...especially before personal agendas! "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 22, 2009 8:38 AM:

" To Jethro and Carl Speckler, I guess neither of you read my opening line. I am not against letting siblings go to the same school, I just don't think that it should have a higher priority over more legitimate reasons. This take for example in theory, one child should be attending Hanford High, but due to a desire to participate in ROTC has a need to attend West, now along comes the sibling who is a pacifist, has no desire to participate in ROTC, why should that sibling be given a preference over somebody else who might want to go to West for ROTC training? Do either of you see my point? I am not 100%against siblings or children of parents within the school district attending the same school, I just don't see it as #1 priority. Life is hard for all of us. (continued) "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 22, 2009 8:45 AM:

" To Jethro and Carl Speckler, (continued) In all honesty what I am more concerned about is seeing students being recruited for sports. All of a sudden the boundaries seem to disappear, whether with full knowledge of the school, or by deeit on the players side by being able to using the grandparents, uncles or aunts or seperated parents addresses. Don't tell me it doesn't happen, as I have personally seen it happen. Why do kids from the same neighborhood attend different schools? And it isn't because of a choice between ROTC or FFA. It is because they have been recruited for the sports ability.

What students from the East side attend West? My kids live on the East side and attend Hanford High. I don't have the map of the exact boundries in front of me, but from the East side area that I live Hanford High is closer, yet the further South you travel, West is a more logical choice. Also I don't know the Pioneer boundaries, but why would they all have to attend West? "

Carl.Spackler wrote on Jan 22, 2009 8:12 PM:

" NotHome Grown: What has all the monkeying with school boundaries ever accomplished for HJUHSD? They have bad test scores, drop out rate, SAT's, % going to college. You would think all the micro-management of boundaries and lamebrain programs we would have another Clovis Unified but unfortunately we are at the opposite end of the scale. Parents deserve choice in where their kids go to school not a quota system. "

Uncle Buck wrote on Jan 23, 2009 6:48 AM:

" And now the whining about recruiting starts to ooze out of people who claim to care about education. I just watched the HH vs HW boys BB game and those two teams were about as even as they get. As a matter of fact I think the Huskies win @ home.

For the Huskies sakes lets pretend that recruiting runs like wildfire in the Bullpup programs. All these new rules do is keep honest people honest. Would it stop recruiting if it existed? NO... Change an address, rent an apartment, whatever. Its kind of like the fencing that now goes all the way around the schools. What a waste of money, as all they do is, keep honest people honest. Vandals and phantom recruiters go right over the fences you build. "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 23, 2009 12:33 PM:

" To Carl.Spackler -since I don't know the exact boundaries and such, I don't know what you mean by monkeying with them, please define. Also what do you mean by quotas? The only thing that I can see about quotas would be to ensure that we are not creating segregated schools because of boundaries. When my I first moved here and my first child was getting ready to enter the HJUHSD, we got the implied impression that to attend East (now just Hanford High), you had to have good grades. When my second child started there was no mention of that, but rather based upon where we lived, and we lived within the boundaries (or at least I presume so, for again I will state that I don't personally know where the boundaries are). But I will presume that not just a single house in the middle of an established neighborhood is singled out to allow that child to attend a different school over all of the other children (again ROTC and FFA are not an issue). Sure sounds like recruiting to me. "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 23, 2009 12:38 PM:

" To Uncle Buck, are you trying to tell me that no one in the entire HJUHDS has ever falsified there home of record to be able to play on a specific sports team? I am not implying that all teams do it, or that even if all are doing it that that team is undefeatable. The old saying, on any given Sunday any team can beat another, otherwise there wouldn't be a need for odd's makers in Lost Wages. There is no perfect boundary divisions, but as long as the boundaries were drawn with proximity to a school as a major factor, then I am all for it. I know from first hand experience, I lived on the wrong side of the street, had to walk to Junior High, yet my neighbor, 40ft across the stree could ride the bus, but there has to be limits.

My original postings were directed more to Mrs. D who has since had to backtrack to her statements that only the Pioneer kids would be kept together and sent to Sierra, something that I considered a snobbish attittued. "

jethro wrote on Jan 23, 2009 3:47 PM:

" NGH, by your own admission you are nothing more than a rumor starter. You state you dont even know the current boundaries, nor Pioneer's, and yet youre defending the high school's boundary decision to go along with the infamous rumor that recruiting takes place. You obviously are out of touch, because the new boundaries WERE NOT drawn with proximity to a school as a factor... thus why those who live east of Douty are deemed to attend Hanford West, and not Hanford HS, which is much closer. Another of your inaccuracies is stating Hanford HS was East... Hanford HS has ALWAYS been Hanford HS, there has never been an Hanford East, the schools merely been referred to as East by people like yourself. Why do you people feel compelled to respond and when you are purely speculating and prove it in your posts by stating obvious false info?

Here's the issue, many in this community are third and fourth generation Bullpups. Many of the kids have grandparents, parents, aunts, unlces, cousins, and siblings who played for the Bullpups, so now many of the younger children want to be Bullpups too...its called TRADITION! "

jethro wrote on Jan 23, 2009 3:50 PM:

" (continued) It has nothing to do with recruiting. If people are willing to jump through the amount of hoops it takes to get their kid into one campus or another, why do you care? Some people dont care where their child attends high school and that's fine, but some who are now deemed to be a Golden Bear still want their child to go to school with their siblings and be a Bullpup. (Just like some want them to join their siblings as a Husky too) The recruiting statement is a simply slanderous, Hanford HS has better coaching at them moment, and it's unreal to think that some of their teams are hated by others in the community just because they are good at their sport. I will admit that tradition and winning informally recruits kids, but to state the local high school coaches are out scouring through the talent at the Elem Schools is ridiculous.

Society today is turning more socialistic by the moment. HJUHSD is trying to force their form of equality (social demographics) on the community by basically using the boundaries as a form of cross town busing. "

kermit the frog wrote on Jan 23, 2009 3:56 PM:

" You guys are so spoiled and ethnocentric. Try living where white kids (me) had to be bussed to school an hour away (with half black population) instead of being able to go to the neighborhood school 10 minutes away, due to antidiscrimination efforts. That was my adolescence. Glad gas was under $1 then. "

Uncle Buck wrote on Jan 23, 2009 4:23 PM:

" To Not Home Grown... I am in no way implying that people are not changing or lying about their address in order to attend a certain school. This happens all the time at both schools. I even know a family that lies about their address so the kids can attend Hanford Elementary rather than go to Pioneer, go figure. The point is this happens all over for many reasons and it doesn't indicate that recruiting is going on. To imply that a child was actually motivated by a school representative or coach to lie about an address is just irresponsible. Recruiting would imply that the program is dirty when its much more likely that the program had nothing to do with it. My whole point is that the dishonest people will still go to the school that they choose and the honest people will suffer the inconvenience of the schools DUMB "policies". "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 26, 2009 11:30 AM:

" To Jethro, I can understand wanting your offspring to attend the same school at the university level, but not the high school, if you are such a fanatic about, why not have all of your offspring living on the same blocK? Why should you cousin second removed be able to attend HHS rather than HWHS living in the SouthEast corner of Hanford just because you once attended East, and yes I am calling it East, don't forget I am not inbreed, and don't come from around here. You make false statements, yet I have only made factual statements, you say everyone East of Douty attends HWHS? Then why did both of my children attend East? I only stated the facts that I don't know the boundaries, how does that disqualify me from this discussion or imply that I am making false statements. You are the one that is making false statements. Just because you are 4th/5th generation or even the original settler does not give you guarntied admission to HHS. Where you physically lives does. "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 26, 2009 12:10 PM:

" To Jethro, pleae tell me why you think that your offspring should have priviledges ahead of my children to attend HHS? I live within the boundaries, I presume. Please provide me with the exact map that you are so upset with. Prove to me that people in the NorthEast of Hanford (not Pioneer) have to attend HWHS. I could see why someone who lives East of Douty, South of Florinda should attend HWHS, as that would be closer than HHS. Now if the city simply has everyone East of Douty attends HWHS, between Douty and 12th attends HHS, and West of 12th attends Sierra, then I would call a stupid plan. But I do agree that based upon the populace of the students attending then lines need to be drawn to make the schools approximately the same size, and the distance to be travelled approximately the same. I have also never implied that all coaches at HHS recruit, but I do feel that at least one did, why else did a majority of the team come from Woodrow Wilson, rather than from JFK? "

Jethro wrote on Jan 26, 2009 10:28 PM:

" NHG, you should go to the HJUHSD website to see who is stating factual information and who is speculating. Here you go... http://www.hjuhsd.k12.ca.us/attendanceareas.htm My prior post was in reference to how Pioneer School District was split in regards to the high school boundary. Fact!... Everyone (in Pioneer) who lives EAST of Douty is deemed to attend HW, look for yourself. How is that a neighborhood school program? Why should a kid who lives off of 10th Ave attend HW, just because they are also in Pioneer's District. You stated, "I do agree that based upon the populace of the students attending then lines need to be drawn to make the schools approximately the same size, and the distance to be travelled approximately the same" This is my point, theyre not the same when they are sending kids who live just north of HH clear across town to HW, all because they live in Pioneer's District. Do you think a kid who lives near 10th & Fargo should have to travel clear across town to HW? Tell me how that is fair? "

Jethro wrote on Jan 26, 2009 10:32 PM:

" (continued) I have never stated sibling transfers should be admitted into any high school before those living in the boundary. But there again you speculate and here's proof why. HW has had a much larger enrollment than HH, so there has been a need for transfers to HH anyway to equal the campuses enrollment... so why not let siblings transfer and go to the same school? "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 28, 2009 12:36 PM:

" to jethro, I hope that you are continuing to follow this thread since it is off the main, and if I should see you posting on something else I will advise you of my post here. First thanks for providing the info on the boundaries, as I didn't know them, but had to counter some of your claims for I what I knew to be the truth. Your final reponse is correct, whoever came up with the boundaries is assinine, why they didn't try for a better parabolic lines I don't know, but you are right to have the Pioneer kids within the 10-railroad, fargo to flint go to West is no using the old noggin. They should go to HHS, and those kids in Hanford elementary in the Eastern section south of Florinda should go to West. So I guess that we are both in agreement over the boundaries are absurd, but that I continue to disagree about siblings, though you have toned that back also. continued "

NotHomeGrown wrote on Jan 28, 2009 12:42 PM:

" to jethro, continued, again I don't know all of the local schools, but it does seem that some schools that are in the South East of Hanford will have to attend HHS, while the section North of Fargo and East of the railroad will attend West, are the kids going to have to transfer buses to get to school? Seems like this will make for some long bus routes. Lastly please remember that I got into this discussion because of Mrs.D and her posts on a previous blog. Ask her why she thinks that it is a great thing for so many of the Pioneer kids to be stuck together at West? She had originally insisted that all Pioneer 8th graders would be kept together and sent to Sierra, and I took her comments as snobbish and elitist. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts