Currently
48°
Showers

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Fiscal pain for HJUHSD

California school districts just received the latest-ever mid-year budget cuts in conjunction with an earlier-than-imagined subsequent year budget adoption -- decisions that have education officials working to decipher the implications for their schools. The state decisions will mean 14 less teaching positions in the Hanford Joint Union High School District in 2009-2010, as well as non-teaching staff cuts.

Savings decisions beyond the initial staff cuts -- done first to meet the mandated March 15 deadline to notify teachers of a potential non rehire -- will be made by district officials over the next six weeks, as they work on a new district budget.

Handling 2009-10 cuts on top of mid-year cuts will prove challenging, especially in anticipation of opening Sierra Pacific High School's doors in the fall. District officials held a budget study session prior to the board meeting Tuesday to begin discussions. Trustees will adopt a district budget for next year by the end of June.

Cheryl Silva, district assistant superintendent of business services, said at the study session the state's cuts resulted in $1.5 million less in funds for the next school year. Additionally, opening Sierra Pacific will cost an estimated $283,665. Those costs include an estimated $150,000 for utilities, just under $59,000 for supplies to run the school and about $75,000 for stipends for athletic coaches and activity advisors.

Also, the district's payroll annually increases by nearly $500,000 because of contractual bonuses. Because the district will cut staffing for 2009-10, the increase will be slightly less at about $430,000.

Specifically among cuts to the district's payroll, are administrative changes that trustees approved Feb. 24, which will save nearly $200,000 for next year. Also, trustees approved "pink slipping" five full-time teachers, bringing the total cut with retirements and non re-hires to 14 teaching positions.

At their March 24 meeting, trustees will consider reducing the hours of two non-teaching district employees and laying off a full-time mechanic. Altogether, staffing cuts and leaving some vacancies unfilled will save the district about $1.2 million in 2009-10.

District officials have added to this total a 25 percent reduction in budgeted site expenditures, but are still beginning budget discussions for 2009-10 at a deficit of $713,665, Silva said.

She added that these numbers don't factor in money promised from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 signed by President Barack Obama Feb. 17. Those funds are restricted to spending in specific areas, but may benefit schools, if state officials don't keep a portion to back-fill the state budget or make additional cuts since schools are getting federal help -- both concerns voiced by numerous local education officials this week.

But there is one ray of sunlight filtering through -- though its helpfulness to school district budgets may not prove beneficial to California students -- in the state's decision to allow flexibility in the spending of several previously restricted funds through June 30, 2013. For several categorical programs such as school safety and adult education, California schools will receive funding but won't necessarily have to provide the services. It will be up to school districts to decide whether to provide the programs and services or use the money in their general funds.

However, some programs such as special education and vocational education will not be allowed this flexibility.

"Although the budget was seen to be insurmountable, the flexibility offers us some hope," Silva said. "It really is interesting how they came up with what is flexible and what is not."

In the meantime, the district is still missing its $14 million for the construction of Sierra Pacific that was expected in December. Silva said there has been no update on the status of the money, but that if the state bases disbursement on a "first-in, first-out" method, the district's money would be sixth on that list.

"We have about 60 days left of money to spend on construction payments before we would have to potentially pause construction," Silva said.

District officials are collaborating with contractor Dave Bush to explore potential alternate funding options that might allow a temporary continuance beyond 60 days without the state money, Silva said.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2424.

(March 11, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

just wondering wrote on Mar 11, 2009 12:49 PM:

" So Sierra Pacific (if it opens) will have to staff out of the teachers left after the layoffs? At least they have a football coach! I remember way back when-administration staff were in the classroom part of the day, and ALL coaching staff were in the classroom all day with the exception of those coaches that are hired on a per-diem basis only because they have other jobs. For that matter, what about hiring some college students that are planning to become teachers and or coaches to help out with extra curriculars? Most of them are desperate for work and they would also work on the cheap. It would also be good on the job training for them. They could help out with sports, band, FFA, drama etc. I'm just thinking of ways to keep these programs going with a minimum of $$$ Maybe admin should consider some pay cuts as well hahaha. For that matter, what does the board get paid? Maybe something could be trimmed there as well "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 11, 2009 3:58 PM:

" What the School Board take cuts everyone knows the School Board doesn't take cuts it makes cuts to everyone else to afford their salaries first and foremost.
It seems such a struggle these days for students to receive a High School education. It is almost as bad as pulling teeth to get the correct teaching staff, funding and expenditures to line up in place to accomplish this task. Yet 51% of every tax payer dollar is suctioned away for education and that doesn't even count the lottery dollars that go into education. Remember those that promise of a windfall for allowing the lottery to be legal in California. I think we should outlaw the lottery, return that money to the family budgets, start teacking our children how to read, write and do arithmetic and be done with it. All these advancements in education seem way too costly to me for the american public to afford. Funny thing is we can't compete in the world economy with the expensive education we pay for as it is, maybe the basics is where we belong again. Build schools based on funding and attendance not pipe dreams "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 11, 2009 4:06 PM:

" We already know teachers teach, what do Administrators do? "admin" Seems to me too much paperwork not enough teaching, will cost you a school every time.
FFA, Ag just about any Departmental Activity has sense enough to work within it's own budget, yet the School Board does not utilize that same restraint. We under estimate our forecasted budget not by hundreds of dollars but by fifty times or a hundred times that figure. It's like the budget is being done via etcha scetch or something, no one is really paying attention to the numbers. Seventh and Eighth Graders could balance a better checkbook. We have a brand new school if we can finish paying for it and if we can find the funds to operate it before the contractor screams foul or the state steps in and takes the campus over because we can't manage money. How ridiculous will we look when it is announced statewide the state of California had to step in and manage one of our newest campus projects and schools, we will look like blithering idiots. So regardless of who's fault it is, their's your statewide image. "

Pup Parent wrote on Mar 11, 2009 9:59 PM:

" WDF says "It's like the budget is being done via etcha scetch or something, no one is really paying attention to the numbers. Seventh and Eighth Graders could balance a better checkbook."

Well WDF I thought i just read a couple weeks ago that the State just reached a budget. The schools have been forced to operate with an undetermined budget. It appears to me that the District is indeed "balancing" the budget now that they have an idea of what kind of money they are working with. If your employer (the state) promised to pay you (the district) "x" amount of dollars and then 4 months later decided to pay you 1.5 million dollars less, you are going to have to make cuts to "balance" your budget. You are right that even a seventh grader can see that. I am not a huge fan of school politics but I really don't see how people associate these tough decisions with mismanagement of funds. "

AMV wrote on Mar 11, 2009 10:06 PM:

" I don't know if any of you have gone to a school board meeting, or a school site council meeting or even a parent booster club meeting. I have, and let me tell you people who sit on any board have an incredibly hard job right now.
There is no blame here. The new high school was needed, It takes a very long time to go through just the planning department, much less deal with contractors. Should it really take a couple of years to build a school?
The budget short fall is an unpleasant situation. No one wants to lay off teachers. No one wants their child in a class with 40 + students.
If more people would go to these public meetings, there would be less of a problem. But parents are just too busy running their kids to this lesson or that lesson to actually listen at a meeting, Wake up People get involved in your kids lives. Volunteer, why do you think they pay people to do coaching? No one volunteers, they just criticize these people. Be a productive member of our community.!! "

isitbest4kids wrote on Mar 11, 2009 10:27 PM:

" Spending $75,000 for stipends for athletic coaches and activity advisors! Wow now we know where the Ag Program SAE period money is going to go. Come on people, $75,000 for coaching positions that won't put a varsity team on the field for three years? Is this the best thing to be doing for the kids in the district? The Ag program is going district wide, but how are they going to be successful with a loss in their budget they will take from losing those SAE periods? What is the district doing to support career and technical education? Isn't high school supposed to train kids in some sort of skill to get a job after graduation? Not all of our kids are going to go to college let’s not through them under the bus just to have freshman sports. Call your board members, principals, and the superintendant and let them know that this is not the best use of district funds for our kids. Give those SAE periods back to the Ag Teachers to continue their proven success district wide "

Buster07 wrote on Mar 12, 2009 8:03 AM:

" Hmmmm....if anyone is still having doubts about opening the new school they should be answered now! It is going to cost us nearly a half million dollars to open a school for only 200 students? And at the cost of people's jobs, the two other high schools, and the ag program? Yah, lets just keep going down this horrible fiscal road just so we don't look bad. The incompetence is embarrassing! "

getaclue wrote on Mar 12, 2009 9:28 AM:

" Wow! Two persons commenting, one more off-base than the other.

Almost all coaches are teachers, and the ones that not teaching all day aren't employed by the district.

Watchdog, school board members don't receive salaries. Education is expensive, but CA is near the bottom in per-pupil spending. You're also right about how the lottery was to be "extra" money to close that gap. Politicians have slowly reduced the revenue limit to the point where lottery dollars are part of the base instead of extra.

Do administrators "administrate"? Sure, but you have no idea what that is. If you don't do the paperwork or jump through the right hoops, you don't get paid or you might get sued. Politicians establish these requirements, and you only hear about them when there is a failure and it's int eh papers - be happy about that.

Lastly, budgets are built on what the state says they'll get. How would your finances be if your employer kept reducing your income after saying you would earn X dollars? You aren't allowed to have a huge savings, and the government tells you what money you can use for what purpose. "

kermit the frog wrote on Mar 13, 2009 11:34 AM:

" Fred, until you spend a day job-shadowing a school administrator, you have no business claiming they just push papers. They have to make sure the staff is in place, teachers know what to teach, the kids stay in line, the reports are made in a timely manner to the powers that be, manage the budgets, address the jillion parent complaints and unreasonable demands, attend meetings, among other things. Lunch? Not a chance. You have to try to sneak away just to snack on something you maybe remembered to bring to school. Their pay may be higher, but if you break it down into hours and days worked, it's not that much more than many other jobs. Cut em some slack. Most of them work very hard under a lot of stress. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 17, 2009 6:45 PM:

" To: getaclue wrote on Mar 12, 2009 11:28 AM:

You want to talk about budgets, try meeting payroll and budgeting a fleet of trucks for a full year in private industry making deliveries six and seven days a week. Then you will know what a budget is, how many tires are you gonna have to buy how many engines are gonna blow up with 200 and 300 thousand miles on them over what they should have already been ran? How much is fuel costs going to fluctuate, how many new people are you going to have to train? Operate a fleet in Southern California for two or three years and then get back to me about budgets. Oh and also make sure you factor in enough to fix refrigeration, freezers and replace that equipment from time to time also in your yearly budget. I took that branch and turned it from negative profit in five years previous to profit in less than 11 months. They showed a profit every year I worked there and it grew as well. That was the test of my employer! (Continued) "

Randy Rickman wrote on Mar 19, 2009 3:07 PM:

" After hearing these issues and more at a lunch yesterday, I think admin is doing a pretty darn good job dealing with what they have. If the administrators I know have any fault, its that they move through the troubled waters like ducks; smooth on top and paddling like crazy underneath the water. Believe me, they are all very focused on keeping an acceptable level of education and minimizing the economy's effect on our kids. I'm sure they would appreciate hearing about any solutions along wih the critique. "

Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 3:56 AM:

" Hey Fred, did the trucks in your fleet often toot their own horns?

Toot-toot!! "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 21, 2009 3:18 PM:

" To: Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 5:56 AM:

" Hey Fred, did the trucks in your fleet often toot their own horns?

Toot-toot!! "


No more than the expatriate teacher with a chip on his shoulder does, their Scott. I was simply responding to a comment made to me, I didn't start the entire budget thing. By the way do you have to provide your headmaster with a budget where you teach? By the way Scott how many people do you supervise, not teach or instruct but actually supervise and receive productivity from in the course of a days work.

Toot their own horn according to the TSB all horns and all other safety devices on all vehicles must function properly at all times.

I'd like to watch you do a walk around inspection on a semi and see you actually pass it? They actually allow fifteen mistakes, why because it isn't easy to do unlike showing up and collecting your check for telling students half truths and falsehoods. I still think you are more interested in teaching your liberal views, than you are History. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 21, 2009 3:18 PM:

" To: Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 5:56 AM:

The only budget you are responsible for is probably your wife's grocery money. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 21, 2009 3:20 PM:

" To: Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 5:56 AM:

I've always been told people who know it, do it people who don't teach. All I can say; is you are making a believer out of me. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 21, 2009 11:21 PM:

" To: Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 5:56 AM:

Gee Scott have you ever had a success to toot your horn about, or just mediocure ideas as we have all witnessed in your blogs?

I don't consider it tooting my own horn when I am responding to a challenge from another blogger. You however, find exception to almost everything I say; which is alright with me. The last thing I want to do is align myself with an expatriate who can't self-sacrifice service to his country. Who can't put on his countries uniform and respond to such events as 9/11. Running off to Switzerland can hardly be called a response to 9/11 unless it is to avoid exactly such a commitment for one's country. Lord knows there has been discussion by such members as Rangal to re-instate the draft, which I think would be a good idea. When you start sending Senators and Congressman's grandchildren to Afghanistan, you might see a resolution appear. When they do it I hope there are no deferments allowed for any reason. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 22, 2009 9:24 AM:

" To: Scott Tucker wrote on Mar 21, 2009 5:56 AM:

Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate a budget you might have had to prepare and stretch throughout the year? Something besides rent, utilities and household needs?
Your biggest budget for the year is saving enough to tour European cities and not run out of funds? Just my guess at your management skills.
You seem to have arisen again is it early spring break in Switzerland or something? You've been so silent for so long, we were getting use to it. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Mar 31, 2009 4:24 AM:

" To: Randy Rickman wrote on Mar 19, 2009 5:07 PM

I don't doubt that the administrators are working Randy, but they are not working in the capacity they did forty years ago. When people like Max Nichols was around as Dean of Students at Hanford High School oh and by the way West Campus was open then also. The discipline problems there were handled by a man named West. How appropriate. My comment is people back then wore more than one hat and performed more than one structured duty per day, per week, per month, you get the idea.
Discipline may have gotten worse, but dealing with it should not have changed. Somewhere, sometime an administrator has to put it all on the line and stand up for what is right. Regardless, of a possible law suit, make sure he/she dots all the i's and crosses all the t's and win one lawsuit and things just might change. The School Disttrict needs to grow a backbone and support such an administrator and then and only then will you see change. But the citizens must support them as well. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (185) Albums

    Kings County Academic Decathlon
    Kings County Academic Decathlon
    Monday, February, 8 2010
    (8) Photos
    Taoist Temple Tour
    Taoist Temple Tour
    Monday, February, 8 2010
    (9) Photos
    Hanford West vs Golden West Boys Basketball
    Hanford West vs Golden West Boys Basketball
    Monday, February, 8 2010
    (10) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (39) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts