Currently
63°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Proposal to cut ag agency draws heat

Kings County's state Sen. Dean Florez has raised the possibility of eliminating the California Department of Food and Agriculture. A press release released earlier this week said Florez, the Democratic Senate Majority leader from Shafter, "pledges a cost-cutting review" of the department in light of major cuts looming for education and health care.

California faces a budget deficit of at least $24 billion and will likely run out of cash in July unless a balanced budget is passed quickly.

"On June 16, the Senate Committee on Food and Agriculture will meet to consider whether or not it makes sense for agriculture to remain the only California industry with its own $100 million general fund-backed agency, when most of its functions could be performed by other departments," the release stated.

Bob Alvarez, Florez's chief of staff, said it's likely that at least some of the department's functions will survive.

But he suggested that many could be picked up by other agencies.

Alvarez indicated that the review is part of a prioritization that puts education and public safety above some other governmental functions.

He called the June 16 hearing "an opportunity for people to justify, in a sense, their existence."

"Obviously, we're going to be aggressive. There is a bar that has been set by (Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's) office," Alvarez said.

Florez couldn't be reached for comment.

Local agricultural leaders defended the California Department of Food and Agriculture, saying it's necessary for the industry.

Two-thirds of the agency's estimated $315 million budget is funded by private sources, according to Tim Larson, Kings County Farm Bureau president.

California agriculture is a $44 billion-a-year industry, with triple that benefit to local economies if the multiplier effect is factored in, according to Larson.

He said the agency plays an important role in import-export food safety issues.

"It seems like (Florez's) proposal is very ag unfriendly. Something that's very productive and lucrative, why would you cut it off at the knees?" he said.

"We need a statewide agency to respond to food safety issues and regulation," said Russell Waymire, a local farmer.

Waymire said the department plays a critical role in ensuring the "vitality and viability of California agriculture."

Mark Trezza, a political science instructor at Fresno City College who lives in Hanford and is also a member of the Kings County Democratic Central Committee, thinks Florez's proposal may be aimed at Republicans who frequently claim that Democrats support welfare and social service programs because the recipients of those programs tend to vote Democratic.

Trezza suggested that Florez might be making the same argument for agriculture, which is perceived as a strong supporter of Republicans.

"I think in the bigger picture of government services, I think we could see as a warning to [Republicans] that 'You have constituents that receive government funding, too, and they are on the radar screen,' " Trezza said.

In the press release, Florez is quoted as saying that "in agriculture, there are business considerations, and there are public health considerations, and we already have agencies that serve both of those functions."

Don Larson, a retired Fresno City College history teacher and a frequent commentator on local politics, questioned why Florez would suddenly be suggesting that the agency's functions can be performed by other departments.

"Where has he been all these years? Because those cuts should have been made a long time ago," Larson said.

(June 9, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

SJT wrote on Jun 6, 2009 8:25 AM:

" "It seems like (Florez's) proposal is very ag unfriendly. Something that's very productive and lucrative, why would you cut it off at the knees?"

The argument is true for those in education, healthcare and others who would say the exact same things. It's a view of selfishness. Take a strong stand to protect that which you posit belongs only to you, and be firm and resolute. Us vs. Them.

There is no climate in which to work together to fix our budget woes. I just hope it doesn't take seeing dozens of families living in their cars in parking lots for us to realize we cannot continue partisan mudslinging instead of sitting down and agreeing on a pragmatic plan to fix our budget with an eye on the long-term (so we don't have to go through this again). "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 13, 2009 1:21 PM:

" Why is it everytime Dean Florez has a dumb statement to make, he is never available for comment. This cannot be by accident, he comes out says what he has to say and then runs for cover. If the Food and Agriculture Department are not needed and other government agencies could do the work, then why have we been spending 100 million dollars a year for all these years. Why didn't Florez, work to deactivate the agency before he decided to run for Lt. Govenor in 2010? Yes, Florez terms out in 2010 and can't run any longer, so he will move to the side he claims to be against for all these years. If Florez is so cost aware and wanting to save the taxpayers money why doesn't he turn down salary increases, pay increases and pay for his own benefit package. That would certainly be a cost savings if all members in the State and Federal Government making more than $100,000 a year would agree to do. Why do they need or deserve prepaid healthcare if they are making that much money. they can afford $500 or $600 a month! "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts