Currently
63°
Clear

Advertisement





Opinion

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Another View: We need a new national anthem

In the Age of Karaoke, more people (including me) like to join in the singing when they strike up the national anthem at public occasions. No one can stop you, no matter how embarrassed she might be by your obvious lack of talent. It’s always disappointing when you’re invited to stand and enjoy some high school glee club or famous opera singer. But chances are that even the opera singer won’t get it right.

“The Star-Spangled Banner” is notoriously unsingable. A professor of music, Caldwell Titcomb of Brandeis, pointed out years ago in the New Republic that its melody spans nearly two octaves, when most people are good for one octave, max. The first eight lines are one enormous sentence with subordinate clauses, leaving no really good place to take a breath. There are far too many mandatory leaps off the high board (”... what so PROU-dly we hail ...”).

The melody is lifted from an old English drinking song. The lyrics are all about bombs and war and bloodshed ” and not in a good way. By the penultimate verse, the song has turned really nasty: “No refuge could save the hireling and slave / From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave.” In the first verse ” the one we generally sing ” there is only one reference to any value commonly associated with America: “land of the free.” By contrast, “home of the brave” is empty bravado. There is nothing in the American myth (let alone reality) to suggest that we are braver than anyone else.

No, “The Star-Spangled Banner” has got to go. The only question is, What should replace it? Here we have an embarrassment of riches. Let’s review some of the candidates.

The unimaginative, easy choice would be “My Country, ’Tis of Thee,” a.k.a. “America” ” as if applying for the job, since the word “America” isn’t even in it. Case for: The melody is simple, familiar and easy to sing, with a range of less than an octave. The lyrics express American sentiments, by and large, though with no particular flair. Case against: The tune is a rip-off of “God Save the Queen,” and as insipid as the lyrics to boot.

“The Battle Hymn of the Republic” has a range of one octave exactly, and beautiful, inspiring lyrics. A bit martial, of course, but in reference to our nation’s greatest cause rather than mindless nonsense about rockets and bombs. A bit religious, too, but probably not unconstitutionally so if “one nation, under God,” passes muster in the Pledge of Allegiance. Written by Julia Ward Howe during the Civil War to supply something more wholesome for Union soldiers to sing to the tune of “John Brown’s body lies a-moulderin’ in the grave,” it is already used sometimes at liberal occasions as a substitute for “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Even at this late date some Southerners might object. But hey ” who won the war?

The best of the conventional choices would be “America the Beautiful.” Its range is an octave plus one note, with a couple of tricky leaps (“Uh-MARE-i-cah, America”). But the tune is lovely, and the lyrics are eloquent and almost eerily appropriate in their humility. (”Confirm thy soul in self-control / Thy liberty in law.”)

What about Irving Berlin’s “God Bless America”? The lyrics are more enthusiastic than eloquent. There is nothing so wonderful about our oceans being “white with foam.” But it’s a tuneful tune, not only easy to remember but hard to get out of your head. It might seem tough to argue that “God Bless America” is not a religious sentiment, potentially violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment. But the song is so jolly and un-hymn-like that I am confident some professors at our finer law schools could make the case. (You see? That tune just fills you with American optimism and energy.) As this column has pointed out, in our political culture the phrase “God bless America” has come to mean little more than “I’m through with my speech. See you later.”

Woody Guthrie wrote “This Land Is Your Land” out of annoyance at the popularity of “God Bless America.” The melody has a range of just seven notes, which is hard to beat. The lyrics can be treated as either a generalized appreciation of the American landscape or a more pointed political claim for equality (“This land was made for you and me”). There’s no question which one Guthrie had in mind. He was a communist fellow-traveler. But the song has been absorbed into our culture and is loved even by Republicans who have no idea about its origins.

How about Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA”? A bit dark for a national anthem, I suppose. The Shaker hymn “Simple Gifts” (turned by Aaron Copland into a theme in “Appalachian Spring”)? Anything would be better than those “bombs bursting in air.”

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

djruiz wrote on Jun 13, 2009 9:15 AM:

" I have exception to the comments concerning the "Bombs bursting in air" and the "Home of the brave." It's those bombs bursting over in air, which throughout our history have given us the victories to preserve our freedoms. Also, only a brave people would go out and war on the behalf of others (Iraq, Vietnam, France, Philippines, etc.) in order to secure their freedoms. Forget the two octives and the drop-offs, The Star-Spangled Banner respresents each of the states, that has sent their children off to war to ensure we live in the land of the free; from sea to shining sea. "

The Oracle wrote on Jun 13, 2009 2:05 PM:

" Only a liberal could say with a straight face to change our national anthem......There are no limits to these people. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 18, 2009 1:57 PM:

" Perhaps when Francis wrote the song, he didn't take into conisderation how difficult it was to sing the song, but how prominant it sounded and how it accurately projected our future circumstances
God out of the Pledge of Allegian, No prayer in school, separation of church and state, I am beginning to see a pattern establishing here.

We have separation of church and state the servicemembers pray to God and then go off to battle. Some even are bold enough to say a silent prayer in a foxhole. But they try their best to keep their church separate from their battles. "

ListenUp wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:12 PM:

" The Star-Spangled Banner was written as a poem. It was not meant to be sung. That's what makes it so hard to sing to the tune of an old Pub drinking song. Only a liberal would try to change our national anthem. Are you calling the kettle black? I do know that Conservatives pushed through the change in the Pledge of Allegence in the 1950's that added under God. At the sametime they also pushed for In God We Trust on all moneies. Conservatives try to push their beleifs on everyone elts. Liberals on the other hand are more Live and Let Live. Our forefathers were smart enough to leave God out of government. Who are you to try to change anything. "

B. wrote on Jun 19, 2009 7:35 AM:

" Maybe Michael Kinsley and people who agree with him should move to a country where the national anthem suits their needs. Obviously America is not for them. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 19, 2009 12:38 PM:

" To: ListenUp wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:12 PM:

It also astounds me, that down through the years people much brighter than you and I have celebrated this song, poem whatever you prefer to call it, as the front runner for our countries National Anthem. Yet you hundreds of years later quetion the authenticity and reason behind it's writing. The author was not in a bar when the song was written he was on the deck of a fighting ship. I doubt he felt poetic, at the moment when after blast after blast from cannon fire, our flag was still there.

People object to the bombs bursting in air, yet that is actually what was taking place. People say they don't want to be lied to and then when the truth is told, they reject it. Amazing Grace! "

Alihandero wrote on Jun 19, 2009 3:38 PM:

" Let’s refresh the meaning of national anthem at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anthem:

"1 a: a psalm or hymn sung antiphonally or responsively b: a sacred vocal composition with words usually from the Scriptures;

2: a song or hymn of praise or gladness;

3: a usually rousing popular song that typifies or is identified with a particular subculture, movement, or point of view."

I am surprised that the always politically correct uber-liberal Kinsley didn’t suggest a Tejano or Hip-Hop song form to celebrate the greatness of the United States of America.

A Polish polka just wouldn’t work right at this moment. "

The Oracle wrote on Jun 19, 2009 4:56 PM:

" "Conservatives try to push their beleifs on everyone elts. Liberals on the other hand are more live and let live"......I throw the BS flag on this quote. Liberals are the one's that want to control every aspect of our lives....what we eat, drive, what Dr we will be going to, all aspects of socialism that your president Obama is driving us towards. Im sorry but I refuse to go along and somewhere in the future there is going to be a groundswell movement (maybe a new party? Tea Party?) that will send a big message to the government saying the same. It may be a mass refusal to pay taxes or something similiar, but i for one will not support a socialist government, no matter what party controls it. I will say it again...I am a patriot for my country...Not necessarily my government...After all, Homeland security already branded most of us a potential terrorists..... "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 19, 2009 8:16 PM:

" To: The Oracle wrote on Jun 19, 2009 4:56 PM:

You just created this vision in my head. Everyone returning to work on Monday morning, requesting new W-4's and marking 10, in the dependants column. The next week the Federal Government would grind to a halt. The State Government wouldn't make it thru to next Friday. Then and there the implosion you keep speaking of, takes place. The Tax Revolt topping all tax revolts, with no money going to any governmentally funded cause, including yes Social Security, if need be. It would be tough but if it sent a message to our representatives enough is enough, it would be so worth it. They'd beg for everyone to return and claim only the dependants they actually had. Oracle you can provide food for thought, in many issues, but this one topped the icing on the cake.

Oh it is so good, to be so close, to being senile!

Whoever would have thought the "Golden Years", meant everything you want need or desire, is higher than the current gold price? "

SC2001 wrote on Jun 20, 2009 8:12 AM:

" I don't agree with the title of the article. What we "need" is for the people in this country to respect our flag and our current anthem. Certain things peeve me off at public events...people who run their mouths during the anthem, a person singing the anthem that doesn't know the words, and a person singing it in a showboating style as to make themselves the emphasis and not our great flag.

Sounds like the author wants the anthem change for his convenience...typical of a Liberal. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 20, 2009 12:37 PM:

" "The Star-Spangled Banner" was recognized for official use by the Navy in 1889 and the President in 1916, and was made the national anthem by a congressional resolution on March 3, 1931 (46 Stat. 1508, codified at 36 U.S.C. § 301), which was signed by President Herbert Hoover.

A great Republican President signed this congressional resolution, no wonder I like this song so much. "

jeff wrote on Jun 22, 2009 9:32 AM:

" First of all I am not advocating a change to the National Anthem. I did however find the following interesting.

Fred gave us some history on the song - which he simply pasted from Wikipedia. The country was founded in 1776 - hold onto that number.

Navy use starts in 1889 - 1776 = 113 years after our country was founded.

Officially recognized by the President in 1916 - 1776 = 140 years after our country was founded.

Adopted by Congress in 1937 - 1776 = 161 years after our country was founded.

On the same Wikipedia page Fred used to gather his data I found this.

"Before 1931, other songs served as the hymns of American officialdom. "My Country, 'Tis of Thee", whose melody was derived from the British national anthem,[2] served as a de facto national anthem of the United States before the adoption of "The Star-Spangled Banner";[3] and "Hail, Columbia," served as the de facto national anthem from Washington's time and through the 18th and 19th centuries."

If it's tradition and patriotism you want then you should be for removing the Star Spangled Banner as our National Anthem. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 23, 2009 3:43 PM:

" Well then I guess there goes "Hail to the Chief" as well. We have to rewrite it to include the words Mesiah. "

Alihandero wrote on Jun 23, 2009 4:14 PM:

" Well, we should hold on to our current anthem a bit longer because Obama just started to fix things worldwide.

I hope to God that the “bombs bursting in air” will not come from Iran or North Korea.

Sic 'em! "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jun 23, 2009 8:14 PM:

" To: Alihandero wrote on Jun 23, 2009 4:14 PM:

Prayer is a good start, but my friend and amigo, I truly think it is gonna take a more physical means to keep that from happening.

If we continue to banter around the barn yard as a freshly hatched chick instead of a steadfast and experienced chicken hawk, we may just get plucked. "

Alihandero wrote on Jun 24, 2009 4:25 PM:

" Right Watchdog...the Big Stick needs to be right there when needed.

Tis a pity that President Obama is viewed as being weak by the rest of the world...I wonder how that's gonna work for him?

Well, his approval ratings are going down the tubes pretty fast... "

mandaa wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:16 AM:

" omg! everything in history is becoming offensive to everyone. i remember every day in school we would say the pledge of alligence. now i guess because it says under god they were going to ban it. it offends some religious people.
this is a christian country. we celebrate christian beliefs (easter, christmas) "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (134) Albums

    Hanford Luminaria
    Hanford Luminaria
    Friday, November, 20 2009
    (6) Photos
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Hanford High vs Dinuba Waterpolo Final
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (13) Photos
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Fire on Hawk Street
    Wednesday, November, 18 2009
    (11) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (37) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts