Currently
57°
Cloudy

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



County to favor local businesses for goods

A bad economy may be good news for some local vendors looking for county government bids. In a response to the shrinking local economy, the Kings County Board of Supervisors this week adopted an ordinance amendment setting a new policy that offers preferential treatment for local vendors when purchasing supplies, materials and equipment.

Surrounding counties, such as Tulare, Kern and Fresno, already have similar policies.

The policy will take effect on July 30.

"We tried this about 14 years ago, and the county counsel at the time advised us not to saying that it was to the best advantage of the taxpayers to get the lowest price regardlless of location," said county Board of Supervisors Chairman Joe Neves. "In the 14 years since, other counties have established this preferential buying policy."

But the interest in the policy was quickly rekindled when Supervisor Richard Valle raised concerns with a recent bidding process in which a local vendor was denied an opportunity to do business with the county because its bid came in a close second to the lowest bid, officials say.

As the county looked for a replacement for a recently wrecked probation department vehicle, three businesses submitted a bid. Among them was Richards Chevrolet of Corcoran, but its bid was beaten by a $22,000 bid for a Chevy sedan submitted by a Fresno dealership, which came in only $200 cheaper. The Corcoran dealership lost the bid as a result.

"Just for that, $22,000 of taxpayer dollars were leaving the county, and sales tax was going to another county," said Valle. He subsequently began advocating for the policy.

Under the new policy, the county will give any local vendor who submits a bid within 5 percent of the lowest bid a chance to submit a new bid within 48 hours that would either match or beat that lowest bid submitted by an out-of-county vendor.

This would only apply to bids and proposals for equipment, materials and supplies, but not for construction projects.

"Had this policy been in effect, the local vendor would have gotten the bid," said Deb West, assistant county administrative officer.

In other words, the county would have still gotten a better price and keep the business local. That's important to businesses that are struggling to survive in the recession and to taxpayers to reap the benefit of the economic multiplier effect, Valle said.

"We can keep our tax dollars here. We keep our sales tax revenues here. At the end of the day, the closer you spend your dollars to home, the better chance you have of getting those dollars back," Valle said.

Neves agreed.

"Every sale that local vendors can make -- whether that be heavy equipment or vehicles or fuel -- and every advantage we can give to our local economy is what we need to do," Neves said. "Because that's where jobs are, and that's the folks who pay the property tax and support local sports programs."

The reporter can be reached at 583-2429.

(July 4, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Skip wrote on Jul 4, 2009 7:42 AM:

" I would think someone could come up with an equation like: Bid minus tax revenue to the county equals net bid. I don't see anything unfair about that. "

Too much wrote on Jul 4, 2009 9:11 AM:

" Glad to hear we are supporting our local businesses. Good job BOS. "

americantaxpayer wrote on Jul 4, 2009 10:02 AM:

" Well it's about dam time! Now only if we can get the Hanford City Council onboard with this same idea! "

Carl.Spackler wrote on Jul 4, 2009 10:14 AM:

" Supervisor Richard Valle, if you read this I salute you for your leadership and thank you to the supervisors for approving it. It's time the City of Hanford adopts the same policy. I'm tired of being outbid by out of town competition by small amounts when I live and pay taxes and pay for a business license in this community. "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 4, 2009 8:55 PM:

" To: Carl Spackler, Richard Valle

It's about time a government official in this community stood up for what's right and all of us have been saying for months now.

You can't expect the local community to support local businesses when the city and county aren't even doing it. Government has to begin to be the example, not the biggest participant in supporting other towns and communities. Charity or Business should begin at home.

David Ayers, Dan Chin, John Gonzales, all the rest are you listening? Support for local business in the community should not be limited to the City Attorney's law firm.

The only way local business grows is if the city and county toss them their business and quit taking the lowest bid for the cheapest work.
.
Richard Valle, keep up the good work and don't be afraid to think outside the box. Too many people in government have blinders on, when it comes to this city and county. Has anyone considered a joint effort between the city and county for some new infrastructure, sewage, water, electric, roads in outlying areas? "

manuel wrote on Jul 5, 2009 10:49 AM:

" How smart of our city council, when the city of hanford is in dire need for monies, they are giving contracts to people outside of hanford, we have elected the best "

disgusted1 wrote on Jul 5, 2009 4:17 PM:

" Are you kidding me??? A local vendor lost a bid because of a $200 difference? I hope no county employees went to pick up that vehicle. Please tell me that the vehicle was delivered by the dealer. I would hate to think that an excess of $200 was spent in wages, fuel, and food to send a county employee or two to pick up that vehicle in Fresno. Once again, are you kidding me??? Good job BOS! It's high time for an amendment such as this! "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 5, 2009 9:18 PM:

" To: manuel wrote on Jul 5, 2009 10:49 AM:

You raise another question you didn't follow up on manuel. What of the maintenance schedules, required, Dealer Only Maintenance Warranty clauses which require the maintenance to be performed only at the dealership of purchase?

Does this mean we will unnecessarily tie up county an employee's time driving to and from the dealership? Not to mention waiting for the vehicle to be serviced/maintained? I don't think the dealership is going to provide a replacement vehicle delivered to the probation department every time this is needed?

So when the vehicle is down the probation employee is down or tied up at a service center all afternoon, while on county time? This shows forethought and planning demonstrated by the purchasing department within the county. I would think we would purposely want to keep our purchases and employees local as much as possible. Perhaps if given the chance Keller might have been willing to match the lower bid to get the business? Eliminating unnecessary miles for service and maintenance. Just wonder if these essentials are even considered? "

Big John wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:55 AM:

" WDF wrote: "David Ayers, Dan Chin, John Gonzales, all the rest are you listening?"

I believe WDF meant to write Joaquin Gonzales.

-Big John "

Watchdog Fred wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:05 PM:

" To: Big John wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:55 AM:

" WDF wrote: "David Ayers, Dan Chin, John Gonzales, all the rest are you listening?"

I believe WDF meant to write Joaquin Gonzales.

-Big John "

-"big john" that is how I tell if you are paying attention, big fella. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



    PHOTO GALLERIES

    "More Photos

    Sentinel Photos (120) Albums

    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Hanford High vs. Lemoore High Water Polo
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (14) Photos
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Tigers vs. Bullpups Volleyball
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (22) Photos
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Hanford West vs. Redwood High Football
    Friday, November, 6 2009
    (13) Photos

    Reader Submitted (7) Albums

    Vintage Hanford
    Vintage Hanford
    Monday, December, 15 2008
    (1) Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Vacation Photos
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (35) Photos
    Events
    Events
    Thursday, November, 20 2008
    (38) Photos

    More



    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
    E-Mail:
    Daily News Updates
    Breaking News Alerts