Currently
52°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Car vs. farm machinery crash likely going to trial

It's a common local event: A giant piece of farm equipment lumbers down a two-lane road at slow speed, often with parts sticking into the oncoming lane.

Usually, the vehicle makes its way to the next field without incident, turns off the road and becomes just another part of Kings County's agricultural landscape.

But sometimes bad things happen. Nov. 12, 2007 was such a day.

According to the California Highway Patrol, Lemoore resident Vicki Miguel and her vehicle slammed at about 60 mph into a tomato cultivator that was moving slowly eastbound on Grangeville Boulevard near 22nd Avenue.

Miguel, who sustained what CHP spokesman Jerry Pierce called moderate injuries, sued and hired prominent local attorney Bob Dowd to press a claim that SS Farms and two of its employees -- one in the tractor pulling the cultivator and another in the pilot pickup out front -- were negligent in the crash.

The civil case, which is set for an Oct. 6 jury trial in Kings County Superior Court, highlights the problems that can result when farm machinery mixes with passenger cars.

Everybody agrees that there is nothing inherently illegal about a tractor or cultivator on a local roadway.

According to the California Vehicle Code, farmers have the right to pull tractors, harvesters and the like onto roads and even highways in the normal course of farming operations.

To push the point, a group of Westside farmers pulled cotton pickers, tractors and other farm equipment onto Interstate 5 near Huron on June 15 to protest a lack of water supplies.

Behind the long column, a truck driver was seriously injured when his big rig barreled into the back of another big rig that had slowed to 15 mph.

Farmers who participated said that an escort vehicle in the rear had flashing lights and a wide load sign. No citations were issued, according to Officer Jimmy Beeson of the California Highway Patrol's Coalinga office.

That June 15 protest highlights another fact that nobody disputes: While farmers have the right to utilize public roadways, their equipment must carry the necessary signs and be clearly visible.

Whether the tractor/cultivator combo met that requirement as it traveled east on Grangeville Boulevard in the waning light of Nov. 12 is at the heart of the Miguel case.

According to Dowd, a piece of the cultivator was sticking out into the westbound lane. Furthermore, he claims that it couldn't be seen and that it should have had lights and/or a reflector on it.

Mary Diepenbrock, the attorney representing SS Farms and its two employees, disputes virtually every aspect of Dowd's account.

The wide point of the tractor had a red flag and the cultivator was illuminated by lights atop the tractor, she said.

And, she said, a pickup escort with flashing lights was in front of the cultivator.

The whole thing was seen by Lemoore resident Jennifer Boudinot, who was driving a vehicle westbound behind Miguel's Lexus when the accident happened.

Boudinot is named in court documents as a witness.

Boudinot said a piece of debris from the crash flew back and damaged the driver's side rear-view mirror on her vehicle.

Boudinot slowed down and was otherwise not involved in the accident.

Boudinot said that she remembers the pickup truck in front with flashing emergency lights as well as lights on the tractor.

Boudinot said she drives that stretch of Grangeville Boulevard often because her husband works at Lemoore Naval Air Station. She said she see lots of farm equipment on that section.

"On that road, if you're not paying attention, it's kind of dangerous," she said.

Claudia Mota, a CHP officer involved in the accident report who is also listed as a witness in court documents, didn't return phone calls seeking comment.

According to Pierce, who reviewed the CHP report, Miguel is listed as the "party at fault." But Pierce added that it doesn't automatically rule out other factors that might have contributed to the accident.

If no settlement is reached and the case goes to trial, it could last up to three weeks, according to Diepenbrock.

The reporter can be reached at 583-2432.

(Sept. 11, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

Boyce wrote on Sep 11, 2009 9:34 PM:

" Traveling near 60mph when she hit the tomato cultivator . Isn't the speed limit 55 along there?

A witness Jennifer Boudinot comments "On that road, if you're not paying attention, it's kind of dangerous," Guess Vicki needed to be more vigilant. I'd be asking to see her cell phone records for the time of the accident.

My thoughts would be the "victim" was speeding in a hurry to get where ever, didn't pay enough attention over taking the SLOW moving cultivator and misjudged the space she had resulting in her accident.

Case closed.


. "

tejano wrote on Sep 12, 2009 10:50 AM:

" Farm equipment does not have a license plate or pay DMV fee's to be on the roadway. Another thing farmers don’t pay fuel taxes they run their equipment on red diesel. (Tax free fuel) I feel that any farm equipment that has to be moved from one location to another need to be moved on a Truck & lowbed trailer. California should make the farmers pay fuel & road taxes for every piece of equipment that is going to be driven on the roadway. And have them equip with singal & brakes lights "Since farm vehicles have a legal right to be on the roadway" " "

manuel wrote on Sep 24, 2009 9:43 AM:

" They should of walked, saved the fuel for their farms, and no accident "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



      PHOTO GALLERIES

      "More Photos

      Sentinel Photos (195) Albums

      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (5) Photos
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (8) Photos
      Arbor Day
      Arbor Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (6) Photos

      Reader Submitted (7) Albums

      Vintage Hanford
      Vintage Hanford
      Monday, December, 15 2008
      (1) Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (42) Photos
      Events
      Events
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (38) Photos

      More



      EMAIL UPDATES

      Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
      E-Mail:
      Daily News Updates
      Breaking News Alerts