Currently
70°
Clear

Advertisement





News

CLASSIFIEDS


Advertisement


Free Ad

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7 for free, select the Clean Sweep option. Unable to submit Real Estate, Services, and Business Investements at this time.

Get a Subscription


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service



Law enforcement plan to get SMART

Kings County is still trying to get SMART.  After months of delay, law enforcement agencies across the county hope to launch by year's end a $1.6 million computer database program aimed at bringing local cops into the 21st century.

The new records management system, known as SMART (Strategically Managed, Analysis and Research-driven, Technology-based), should lead to better communication between public safety agencies and more officers out on the street.

"Let's say there is a stalking case in Lemoore," Hanford Police Capt. Parker Sever said. "The person comes over to our area and commits a crime. In the past, we may know nothing about the case in Lemoore, so maybe we wouldn't handle the case as correctly as we should. Now, with the SMART system, we can see Lemoore's reports and take more appropriate action as a result."

The program was originally approved by the Kings County Board of Supervisors in late December 2008. Initial projections were that the Corcoran Police Department would go live in March, with other agencies to follow.

"The original launch date was set before any of us knew what all would go into bringing the system online," said Corcoran Police Chief Reuben Shortnacy. "We had some complications that arose and kept pushing the date back."




Problems came up when technicians tried to connect the system with other statewide law enforcement databases, such as the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, the California Department of Justice and the National Crime Information Center.

"The company installing the program really underestimated the complications they would have installing the software," Assistant Sheriff Brian Wheat said. "These things have set us back, but we've almost reached all of our goals."

Data also had to be converted from the old system to the new, a process that proved more taxing than anyone expected.

"It takes a lot of time to go through these smaller issues," Shortnacy said. "We want to get it right the first time and that means wading through lots of minutiae. The more work we do on the front end means the less we'll have to deal with after we go live."

Now, as 2009 winds to a close, only the Hanford Police Department has the system up and running.

Corcoran police officials have tentative plans to launch by the last week of November. Lemoore police wouldn't commit to a firm date, but said they should be up and running by the end of the year. The Sheriff's Office is set to follow in early January.

Despite the setbacks, most law enforcement officials said the new system is a "much needed" change. The previous system was installed in 1991 and used a green-screen, DOS-based text system.

"The transition has been a little more difficult than we had hoped, but we really like the system," Sever said. "It has a lot of functionality that we didn't have with the previous setup."

Through SMART, officers can conduct unique database searches for suspects matching broad criteria.

"I can literally search almost anything in this database that I can possibly think of," Sever said. "If I need to know every suspect nearby with blonde hair and a red Toyota Corolla, I can find that. The capabilities are really incredible."

Officers in the field will be able to file reports on the road that are instantly entered in the law enforcement database, which all public safety agencies will share. This means each agency will be able to access the others' reports, making it easier to track suspects that cross jurisdictional boundaries.

In the future, the system will be able to map routes out to patrol vehicles, much like a GPS, to guide officers to the scene of a crime. Police also plan to use SMART's statistical diagnostic tools to highlight high-crime areas in the county and increase patrols in those areas.

Still, Sever anticipates it will take roughly a year before the bugs are worked out and everything is fully up and running.

"The idea is to keep the officers available as much as possible," Shortnacy said. "This means less time filing papers and processing paperwork, and more time out in the field. This way, we will be a much better service to our community.

"The better it is for our officers and support staff, the better it will be for everybody."

The reporter can be reached at 583-2425.

(Nov. 21, 2009)

POST A COMMENT

 

Hanfordsentinel.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. If you want to report a violation, please e-mail editor@HanfordSentinel.com

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 


Please log in to post comments
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
If you don't have an account you can create one for free by clicking the link below.
CREATE ACCOUNT
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Hanford Sentinel

The Shrike wrote on Nov 21, 2009 6:41 AM:

" I don’t know about all the things that the police department managers are saying about how great this program is. I talked to an officer who uses the program and he said it did not work like they were told that it would. He said it was one of the worst programs he had ever used. "

mastiff wrote on Nov 21, 2009 1:59 PM:

" If this SMART system is such a wonderful system then why is every officer and dispatcher saying it is a waste of time and money? The SMART Company is still building or working out the problems. According to Chief Shortnacy “It takes a lot of time to go through these smaller issues”. Shouldn’t these “small” issues be worked out by now? What is an acceptable amount of time for the tax payer to wait one, two, or three years?
What I hear from officers and dispatchers who work with this SMART system is the system is partially built and it’s constantly crashing or losing vital information. I don’t see that as a “small” issue but a MAJOR problem!

This is very typical when managers “fluff” the product or in this case the SMART system. I think as citizens of this community and members of this county should ask the dispatchers and officers who work on this system on a daily basis not managers who oversee it. Our public servants deserve a system that is operational from day one not one that has been installed for nearly a year with “small issues” still being worked out. "

thetruth wrote on Nov 22, 2009 9:46 AM:

" Another multi-million dollar boondoggle that the police chiefs and sheriff concocted and the tax payers will pay and pay and pay!!! "

Alihandero wrote on Nov 22, 2009 8:46 PM:

" What has our elected sheriff have to say about this?

Was it not HIS learned recommendation that advocated this system? Yes or no? Or, did the Board of Supervisors decide the time was right to upgrade all on their own?

Perhaps the named local city police departments first decided to move to this system on their own?

And who recommended THIS particular outside software consultant firm anyway, or was it a closed bid for the only approved software company experienced in these installations?

I think that the modernization is a darn good idea from Dos-era systems.

But I shudder to think of the possible decisions made by those who might lack the requisite education or experience to make the BEST decision possible.

Regardless, I hope this helps protect the citizens of Kings County to a higher degree and gives a better tool to law enforcement officers.

That's what our tax dollars are for.

Right? "

VICTOR III wrote on Nov 23, 2009 4:52 PM:

" I have talked to several officers about this SMART system. They have nicknamed it DUMB instead of SMART. They say there are many issues that need to be worked out before the system should be fully operational. They say the system has created safety issues and overtime. Who was on the comity that decided to use SMART? Did it involve end users from all the departments at the various agencies or just a select few that do not really use the system? Look into SMART yourself and you will see that this is the first agency in CA. that is using, or attempting to use, SMART. Why not go with a system that has experience in CA? That would make more sense! I wish the best for all those that have to use the system. "

Bobb wrote on Nov 23, 2009 6:50 PM:

" I did a ride along with the Fresno PD last year and they have a computer system integrated into each unit. It also monitors the officers and what speed they are traveling at all times, exact GPS location, when lights and siren are on, etc. The screen constantly lists waiting calls in order of received and priority,IE; robbery in progress vs. domestic dispute. They could also type in the report before going to the next call.I don't know it this is the same system but theirs works very well and they seem to have no bugs in it. Maybe someone should check out what they are doing and what system they have. "

Mayberry RFD wrote on Nov 23, 2009 7:55 PM:

" You really don't expect the Sheriff and Police chiefs will admit they made a mistake, do you?

They bought a program that wasn't ready and they were told it wasn't ready. Now they have to put lipstick on the pig and hold their nose.

They, especially the Sheriff, are hoping nobody will start asking questions until they get it working. same ol' same ol'... "

ToldYouSo wrote on Nov 24, 2009 6:22 PM:

" All right, the general public now gets a ticket for even looking at their cell phone when driving but somehow it is safe for police officers to work on a compuer while driving. So much for equal rights. "

VICTOR III wrote on Nov 24, 2009 6:30 PM:

" Bobb, the system Fresno has is called Data 911. Their cooperate office is located in Alameda, CA. I have seen their system in action on ride-a-longs and it is pretty impressive. I recently went on a ride-a-long with Hanford and saw the SMART system. I can say that Data 911 seemed better. I am no expert on the matter, but am speaking from what I saw. Data 911 is currently being used by both large and small cities in California, according to their website. Maybe The County and its cities should be looking at that system, which seems to have the bugs worked out. I guess that would make too much sense!! "

mastiff wrote on Nov 24, 2009 6:34 PM:

" Bobb it sounds like you were impressed with Fresno’s system. Does anyone know the name??? I still cant figure out why agencies in Kings County went with a system from another state. What about buying local or within California? Shouldn’t we put money back into California and not another State? Red Flag #1!!!! This company is new to California and is building the system from scratch. Red flag #2!!!!
This system sounds like an early morning Paid Infomercial, for only $1.6 million tax payer dollars your agency will get a SMART System that doesn’t work and has lots of “Small Issues” but wait that’s not all if you order now it will be ready in two-three years. Owner Manuals or instruction guides are not included in the price because the system has many “small issues” and they will need to be worked out. "

the oracle wrote on Nov 25, 2009 2:56 PM:

" Fresno County S.O. CAD/RMS system was developed in-house, tailored to the needs of the agency. In fact, they offered to give it to Kings County for FREE, so that we could have Fresno and Kings county on one RMS (records management system). Gee what a concept, an RMS system that encompasses the data of 2 counties for law enforcement. But alas, its NT basesd software, not AS 400, and if its not AS 400, information dept wont play...Its all about fifedoms. This is why the sheriffs office wanted their own computer guy in years past. Oh well, at least their is BOTOG...Hahahaha "

Bobb wrote on Nov 25, 2009 3:47 PM:

" Victor lll; Thanks for the information. Mastiff; I was very impressed with how they could co-ordinate officers and equipment through this system. That night Detectives were following a van on Jensen going east with an wanted armed felon inside. They were trying to let him get into an industrial or more rural area to make the stop. He "made" them and jumped out of the van, jumping a wall and got into a residential area. They cordoned off two blocks with more patrol cars than I had ever seen and brought in the helicopter to light the area and do surveillance. They then closed the area down to one block and brought in several K-9 units and caught the culprit changing clothes in a back yard. The gun was found in the adjoining yard. It was amazing how all of this was done and how this information system worked. I had to stay in the car- darn rules. "

Mastiff wrote on Nov 26, 2009 4:46 AM:

" Assistant Sheriff Brian Wheat said. "These things have set us back, but we've almost reached all of our goals."
I would like to hear more about the goals that are set for this system. Have we set our goals so low that any computer company can meet them? Maybe we should have Atari build this system because it sure runs like an Atari game. The only thing is it's not making us millions we're paying millions to play this bad game with small issues.

Bobb; you should try to go on a ride with one of the departments using the system and compare the products. "

Alihandero wrote on Nov 28, 2009 5:57 AM:

" In "Business protests non-local contractor", the County Supervisors chose the best contractor based upon a proven track record and experience with the work as specified by the County.

One knowledgeable official said: "this company has the knowledge and experience to be able to come in and complete the task at hand and do a very good job at it."

My comment related to this SMART system is as follows:

Jeez, one would think that this same sound logic would have been applied to the one million, six hundred thousand dollar law enforcement records management system ironically called "SMART."

The system is apparently still dysfunctional and not usable as widely as promised. On the SMART company website, at least one other County had problems so great that SMART had to completely rewrite a whole program for them!

But the KC reports are in: 'they are working on it...'

One would say contractors need to be vetted properly to see if they have a proven efficient track record while elected law enforcement officials need the education and experience to help deliver a quality product to the taxpaying voters.

Is that asking too much? "

ToldYouSo wrote on Nov 28, 2009 12:36 PM:

" ... so for all this money can they at least talk to this system through voice recognition software and have it give them verbal summaries of the data it contains so they don't need to type and read while driving??? "

Solon wrote on Nov 28, 2009 10:01 PM:

" I know some knowledge about this project, and have a little info to share. The people at SMART sold all county law enforcement agencies an integrated fully customizable program. Law enforcement got to meet with and tell them everything they wanted the system to do, then they go back and write the programs to meet the customers needs. Because this is their first system in California (I'm 99% sure on this) they had to write several programs to deal with the "Great State of the Peoples Republic of California". They have said that the program is not yet ready to be activated, however, administraors, politicians, and generally those in charge what to see something for their money now! So they instructed them to activate what they have. So they did as directed and activated a not yet fully prepared program. Rather than berate SMART maybe some focus should go towards the people in charge who lack the patience to do a job right. I'm just saying... "

As a tax payer wrote on Nov 28, 2009 10:21 PM:

" If I bought something at the store and it didn't work I would take it back, Simply. I say step up managers/leaders and get your/our money back. Then let's move on to the next system. Maybe one thats proven and working properly already. "

Bobb wrote on Nov 29, 2009 5:32 PM:

" If what the Oracle is saying is true I am somewhat amazed that KC did not go with the proven system that would not cost anything. A BIG plus would be that adjoining county's could coordinate operations that ran over county lines. During tough economic times is not the time to buy an unproven system. If the company selling it is setting up a new system to market they should offer KC a huge discount for being the guinea pig. "

irving wrote on Nov 30, 2009 2:29 PM:

" sounds like we have a couple of cops blogging. how does one go on ride alongs with various law enforcement agencies? WOW! Wouldn't mind going on a couple myself. I'm new to the area so don't know the situation but it sounds to me like the ride along guy should be in charge. Seems to know his/her stuff "

Bobb wrote on Nov 30, 2009 3:35 PM:

" irving; I know a couple of Fresno PD officers and I asked to go on a ride along. You can also request it through their office and they will assign you to an officer. You are allowed only one per year and must not have any felonies or on probation or parole. That is Fresno's rules in general. I do not know about Hanford PD or the Kings Co Sheriff ride alongs. I am sure you can call their office for the information. I had never done anything like this before and was teasing these guys about donut shops and easy work and got called on it. Quite an eye opener as I was in the West Fresno beat. "

VICTOR III wrote on Nov 30, 2009 11:47 PM:

" Solon I'm not way I disagree with what you are saying, but is sounds like you are blaming that state of Ca. I am sure management may have played a factor, but why would you offer a system in California when you have not set it up for California. It does not make any sense to be the first agency to use this program in California. They agencies then get to try and work out the bugs for SMART. Sounds like SMART is getting a good deal. The agencies can work out all the bugs then SMART can sale it to other agencies as a completed and bug free program. Solon you seem to have a lot knowledge on SMART why don’t you post your real name and the agency/organization you work for? Maybe you can answer some more questions the concerned citizens and officers of the County and cities have! "

VICTOR III wrote on Nov 30, 2009 11:49 PM:

" This is a quote from the SMART websites case studies, http://www.smartpss.com. “The Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA) is responsible for law enforcement on all major bridges in Philadelphia. They typically have over 2 million people travel through their jurisdiction daily. DRPA had a big project to complete on a tight timeline. One of the vendors they approached suggested that the project would take a year to complete. SMART started the project mid-summer of 2006 and had all of the required components live by the September 30th deadline. The project consisted of a six-site S*CAD system, S*MOBILE, NCIC, S*RMS and an SMS Messaging System.”
And management in the article is saying it is going to take at least another year to work out the bugs???? Sounds like SMART needs to focus more attention on California and not cities and states in and around Iowa. "

irving wrote on Dec 1, 2009 11:47 AM:

" thanks Bobb. I have no felonies and have never been arrested nor do i have any points against me with the DMV. Great info. I have friend who is with the Sheriff's dept and he said the area around Fresno State has a higher crime rate than W. Fresno. Found it hard to believe at first. Could be interesting with all the college students in the area. We should go on a ride along there. I do hope the cops get smart soon. "

Bobb wrote on Dec 1, 2009 3:23 PM:

" irving; Around Fresno State,(Sin City), it is usually drug possession charges, drunk in public, petty theft, assault (fights among students). IN South West Fresno the crimes are more related to murder, assault with a deadly weapon, gang wars, drug manufacturing and distribution, etc. Crimes but on the more severe type of a scale. I would like to do a ride along with HPD as my year is not quite up with FPD. It is amazing at the BS they must put up with. You can call a cop every dirty name in the book, including racial slurs, and they cannot arrest you for it. Only if you touch them. I don't think I could take that kind of verbal abuse without losing it. "

irving wrote on Dec 1, 2009 8:50 PM:

" You couldn't pay me enough to be a cop. Of course, they don't pay them enough in Lemoore, "

Bobb wrote on Dec 5, 2009 5:11 PM:

" I wonder if this is the same company making the SMART METERS for PG&E. They seem to be having a lot of problems with those meters giving false readings or no readings. "

ToldYouSo wrote on Dec 23, 2009 12:21 AM:

" Does this thing come with a website?? maybe the city can get a 2 for the price of 1 deal. "




Advertisement


HOT TOPICS

> More Hot Topics


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Selma:

    Kingsburg:



      PHOTO GALLERIES

      "More Photos

      Sentinel Photos (195) Albums

      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Lemoore Golfing Lessons
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (5) Photos
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Hanford Youth Baseball Opening Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (8) Photos
      Arbor Day
      Arbor Day
      Monday, March, 15 2010
      (6) Photos

      Reader Submitted (7) Albums

      Vintage Hanford
      Vintage Hanford
      Monday, December, 15 2008
      (1) Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Vacation Photos
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (43) Photos
      Events
      Events
      Thursday, November, 20 2008
      (38) Photos

      More



      EMAIL UPDATES

      Sign up today to get all your local headlines delivered to your home or work e-mail address, so you don't miss the latest in breaking and local news.
      E-Mail:
      Daily News Updates
      Breaking News Alerts